Algorithm and Human Creativity: Threats or Opportunity? A Literature Review

We explore the move from a mechanical vision of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to a systemic vision of Intelligence Augmentation (IA) (Barile et al., 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021; Navarrini, 2020; Chiriatti, 2019). AI assumes the role of empowered intelligence (IA) as it is capable of expressing a capacity for modeling integration of experiences, knowledge and emotions in conditions of strong uncertainty (Barile et al., 2021; Hagel, 2021). But in a world where the nature of machine learning is changing so rapidly, does technology empower or annihilate creativity? The aim of the paper is to draw attention to the impact that disruptive technology has on human creative processes. How might progress in AI affect Human Creativity (HC)?We propose a literature review to better understand both trends and gaps

P499: APPLICABILITY OF 2022 CLASSIFICATIONS OF ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA IN THE REAL-WORLD SETTING

Background: The increasing knowledge of molecular characterization in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) led to the necessity to fully evaluate the genetic profile also for clinical purposes. These efforts resulted in the release of 2022 new editions of AML classification and prognostication systems, including the 5th edition of The World Health Organization (WHO) classification, the International Consensus Classification (ICC), and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for AML prognosis. Aims: We aimed to provide a real-world application of the WHO 2022, ICC and ELN 2022 classifications in the real-world setting, to unravel differences and similarities, and to test their implementation in clinical AML diagnosis. We particularly focused on secondary AML, myelodysplasia (MDS) related. Methods: We selected a cohort of 1001 cases diagnosed with AML according to the WHO 2016 and the ELN 2017 classifications. Where available (44.9% of cases), information concerning a previous history of an antecedent MDS or MDS/Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), as well as a previous exposure to cytotoxic therapies were considered for defining secondary AML (s-AML) and therapy-related AML (t-AML), respectively. Survival outcome was available for 84.4% patients. Results: The overall diagnostic changes between the WHO 2016, compared to WHO 2022 and ICC classifications were 22.8% and 23.7% respectively, with a 13.1% difference in patients’ distribution between ICC and WHO 2022. The “not otherwise specified” (NOS) by ICC and “defined by differentiation” by WHO 2022 categories shrank compared to WHO 2016 (24.1% and 26.8% respectively, vs 38.7%), particularly due to an expansion of MDS-related categories. The 92.7% and the 74.4% of RUNX1-mutated AML were re-classified respectively by the ICC into AML with MDS-related gene mutations and by WHO 2022 into the AML myelodysplasia related (MR) category, although the latter considers RUNX1 mutations lacking of sufficient unifying characteristics. Of 397 cases with a MDS-related AML according to ICC, 55.9% were definable by the presence of a MDS-related karyotype. More than 75.0% of s-AML and t-AML cases presented a MDS-related genetic profile according to both new 2022 diagnostic classifications. The overall re-stratification between ELN 2017 and 2022 accounted for 12.9% (4.0% favorable to intermediate and 8.1% intermediate to adverse risk). The majority of s-AML and t-AML (83.1%) fell into the ELN 2022 adverse risk group. Stratifying the 213 AML classified as favorable risk by ELN 2017, the difference in OS between ELN 2022-defined favorable and intermediate risk groups was statistically significant (p<0.01). We also focused on the heterogeneous group of patients with normal karyotype and adverse risk mutations according to the ELN 2022: the survival outcome was significantly inferior in patients with multiple versus single MDS-related gene mutations (p<0.05). Summary/Conclusion: The 2022 revisions of AML classification led to a significant improvement of diagnostic schemes. In the real-world setting, conventional cytogenetics, usually easily available and less expensive than molecular characterization, correctly stratified 56% of AML MDS-related, thereby maintaining a diriment diagnostic role. Although the secondary nature of AML (prior MDS or MDS/MPN and therapy-related) is now applied as “diagnostic qualifiers”, it maintains a predictive role for defining an adverse outcome according to the ELN 2022. Considering the similarities between WHO and ICC diagnostic schemes, a tentative to generate a unified model taking into account practical and socio-economic issues is desirable

ELN2017 risk stratification improves outcome prediction when applied to the prospective GIMEMA AML1310 protocol

The 2017 version of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations, by integrating cytogenetics and mutational status of specific genes, divides patients with acute myeloid leukemia into 3 prognostically distinct risk categories: favorable (ELN2017-FR), intermediate (ELN2017-IR), and adverse (ELN2017-AR). We performed a post hoc analysis of the GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell’Adulto) AML1310 trial to investigate the applicability of the ELN2017 risk stratification to our study population. In this trial, after induction and consolidation, patients in complete remission were to receive an autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) if categorized as favorable risk or an allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) if adverse risk. Intermediate-risk patients were to receive auto-SCT or allo-SCT based on the postconsolidation levels of measurable residual disease as measured by using flow cytometry. Risk categorization was originally conducted according to the 2009 National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations. Among 500 patients, 445 (89%) were reclassified according to the ELN2017 criteria: ELN2017-FR, 186 (41.8%) of 455; ELN2017-IR, 179 (40.2%) of 445; and ELN2017-AR, 80 (18%) of 455. In 55 patients (11%), ELN2017 was not applicable. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 68.8%, 51.3%, 45.8%, and 42.8% for the ELN2017-FR, ELN2017-IR, ELN2017-not classifiable, and ELN2017-AR groups, respectively (P, .001). When comparing the 2 different transplant strategies in each ELN2017 risk category, a significant benefit of auto-SCT over allo-SCT was observed among ELN2017-FR patients (2-year OS of 83.3% vs 66.7%; P 5 .0421). The 2 transplant procedures performed almost equally in the ELN2017-IR group (2-year OS of 73.9% vs 70.8%; P 5 .5552). This post hoc analysis of the GIMEMA AML1310 trial confirms that the ELN2017 classification is able to accurately discriminate patients with different outcomes and who may benefit from different transplant strategies. This trial was registered as EudraCT number 2010-023809-36 and at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01452646

Complex karyotype in unfit patients with CLL treated with ibrutinib and rituximab: the GIMEMA LLC1114 phase 2 study

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the presence of a complex karyotype, as defined by ≥3 chromosomal abnormalities in the neoplastic clone, has been shown to confer an adverse prognosis in retrospective series of untreated patients and in patients treated with chemoimmunotherap

Prognostic impact of genetic characterization in the GIMEMA LAM99P multicenter study for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

Recent advances in genetic characterization of acute myeloid leukemia indicate that combined cytogenetic and molecular analyses provide better definition of prognostic groups. The aim of this study was to verify this prospectively in a large group of patients

Philadelphia-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with minimal residual disease persistence and poor outcome. First report of the minimal residual disease-oriented GIMEMA LAL1913

Early recognition of Philadelphia-like (Ph-like) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cases could impact on the management and outcome of this subset of B-lineage ALL. In order to assess the prognostic value of the Ph-like status in a pediatric-inspired, minimal residual disease (MRD)driven trial, we screened 88 B-lineage ALL cases negative for major fusion genes (BCR-ABL1, ETV6-RUNX1, TCF3-PBX1 and KTM2Ar) enrolled in the GIMEMA LAL1913 front-line protocol for adult BCR/ABL1-negative ALL. The screening - performed using the “BCR/ABL1-like predictor” - identified 28 Ph-like cases (31.8%), characterized by CRLF2 overexpression (35.7%), JAK/STAT pathway mutations (33.3%), IKZF1 (63.6%), BTG1 (50%) and EBF1 (27.3%) deletions, and rearrangements targeting tyrosine kinases or CRLF2 (40%). The correlation with outcome highlighted that: i) the complete remission rate was significantly lower in Ph-like compared to non-Ph-like cases (74.1% vs. 91.5%, P=0.044); ii) at time point 2, decisional for transplant allocation, 52.9% of Ph-like cases versus 20% of non-Ph-like were MRD-positive (P=0.025); iii) the Ph-like profile was the only parameter associated with a higher risk of being MRD-positive at time point 2 (P=0.014); iv) at 24 months, Ph-like patients had a significantly inferior event-free and disease-free survival compared to non-Ph-like patients (33.5% vs. 66.2%, P=0.005 and 45.5% vs. 72.3%, P=0.062, respectively). This study documents that Ph-like patients have a lower complete remission rate, event-free survival and disease-free survival, as well as a greater MRD persistence also in a pediatric-oriented and MRD-driven adult ALL protocol, thus reinforcing that the early recognition of Ph-like ALL patients at diagnosis is crucial to refine risk-stratification and to optimize therapeutic strategies

Philadelphia-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with minimal residual disease persistence and poor outcome. First report of the minimale residual disease-oriented GIMEMA LAL1913

Early recognition of Ph-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases could impact on the management and outcome of this subset of B-lineage ALL. To assess the prognostic value of the Ph-like status in a pediatric-inspired, minimal residual disease (MRD)-driven trial, we screened 88 B-lineage ALL cases negative for the major fusion genes (BCR-ABL1, ETV6-RUNX1, TCF3-PBX1 and KTM2Ar) enrolled in the GIMEMA LAL1913 front-line protocol for adult BCR/ABL1-negative ALL. The screening - performed using the “BCR/ABL1-like predictor” - identified 28 Ph-like cases (31.8%), characterized by CRLF2 overexpression (35.7%), JAK/STAT pathway mutations (33.3%), IKZF1 (63.6%), BTG1 (50%) and EBF1 (27.3%) deletions, and rearrangements targeting tyrosine kinases or CRLF2 (40%). The correlation with outcome highlighted that: i) the complete remission (CR) rate was significantly lower in Ph-like compared to non-Ph-like cases (74.1% vs 91.5%, p=0.044); ii) at time point 2 (TP2), decisional for transplant allocation, 52.9% of Ph-like cases vs 20% of non-Phlike were MRD-positive (p=0.025); iii) the Ph-like profile was the only parameter associated with a higher risk of being MRD-positive at TP2 (p=0.014); iv) at 24 months, Ph-like patients had a significantly inferior event-free and disease-free survival compared to non-Ph-like patients (33.5% vs 66.2%, p=0.005 and 45.5% vs 72.3%, p=0.062, respectively). This study documents that Ph-like patients have a lower CR rate, EFS and DFS, as well as a greater MRD persistence also in a pediatric-oriented and MRD-driven adult ALL protocol, thus reinforcing that the early recognition of Ph-like ALL patients at diagnosis is crucial to refine risk-stratification and to optimize therapeutic strategies