Awareness and perception of multidrug-resistant organisms and antimicrobial therapy among internists vs. surgeons of different specialties: Results from the German MR2 Survey

Background: Recently, antibiotic resistance rates have risen substantially and care for patients infected with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) has become a common problem in most in – and outpatient settings. The objectives of the study were to compare the awareness, perception, and knowledge of MDRO and rational antibiotic use between physicians from different medical specialties in German hospitals. Methods: A 35-item questionnaire was sent to specialists in internal medicine (internists), gynecologists, urologists, and general surgeons (non-internists) in 18 German hospitals. Likert-scales were used to evaluate awareness and perception of personal performance regarding care for patients infected with MDRO and rational use of antibiotics. Additionally, two items assessing specific knowledge in antibiotic therapy were included. The impact of medical specialty on four predetermined endpoints was assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Results: 43.0 (456/1061) of recipients responded. Both internists and non-internists had low rates of training in antibiotic stewardship. 50.8 of internists and 58.6 of non-internists had attended special training in rational antibiotic use or care for patients infected with MDRO in the 12 months prior to the study. Internists deemed themselves more confidently to choose the indications for screening patients for colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (P=0.004) and to initiate adequate infection control measures (P=0.002) than other specialties. However, there was no significant difference between internists and other specialists regarding the two items assessing specific knowledge in antibiotic therapy and infection control. Conclusion: Among the study participants, a considerable need for advanced training in the study subjects was seen, regardless of the medical specialty

Prospective Evaluation of Predictive Parameters for Urinary Tract Infection in Patients with Acute Renal Colic

Background: Acute renal colic (ARC) is an emergency that can mostly be treated conservatively, but can be life threatening in combination with urinary tract infection (UTI). Assessment for infection includes white blood cell (WBC) count and C-reactive protein (CRP), but these parameters are often unspecifically elevated and might lead to antibiotic over-therapy. In times of increasing antibiotic resistance, however, unnecessary antibiotic therapy should be avoided. Objectives: The goal of the study was to investigate the prevalence of UTI proven by urine culture (UC) in patients with ARC and to identify predictive factors in the emergency setting. Patients and Methods: We prospectively enrolled 200 consecutive patients with ARC and evaluated blood test results, urinalysis, UC, symptoms suspicious for UTI, and time between symptom onset and admission, as well as body temperature. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors. Results: There were 196 patients eligible for statistical analysis. UTI proven by positive UC was detected in 26 patients (13%). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, suspicious urinalysis (positive nitrite or bacteria > 20/high-power field [hpf] or WBC > 20/hpf), patient age > 54 years and CRP >= 1.5 mg/dL (fivefold increase) were significant predictors for the presence of UTI. Neither elevated WBC count nor typical UTI symptoms were associated with UTI. Conclusions: Based on our results, a routine antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with ARC does not seem to be appropriate. Patient age and CRP can help to decide if antibiotic treatment might be indicated, even in case of a not clearly suspicious urinalysis. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Impact of Male Patient Information on Quality of Urine Examination (PIQUE Study)

Background: Urine examination has relevance for treatment, and reliability of positive urine culture (UC) is of importance. The technique of urine sampling (US), storage, and transportation is important. The objective of this study was to investigate if detailed patient information for the technique of US and hygiene reduces rates of contaminated UC in screened male patients, as this group was not investigated yet. Methods: All patients independently of complaints were enrolled prospectively and consecutively in an outpatient setting in 2 groups – the first group did not receive detailed information and the second group did. We examined 372 consecutive patients in 2017, 190 not receiving (median age 69 years) and 182 receiving information (median age 70 years), with comparable numbers of patients and age. The result of UC and age was imposed. Results: In all,74.2% of preclarification UC showed a contamination (n = 95) and 75.5% after clarification (n = 83), without significant differences (p = 0.827). This study is limited by the fact that adherence could not be checked. Conclusions: Similar to studies with females, no difference occurred in rates of contaminated UC, so detailed information regarding the US technique does not decrease rates of contaminated UC and vice versa does not increase the quality of midstream-sampled UC in male patients

Loss of CHEK2 Predicts Progression in Stage pT1 Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)

Downregulation of checkpoint protein kinase 2 (CHEK2), which is involved in DNA repair, is associated with poorer outcome in various tumors. Little is known about the role of CHEK2 in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). In the present study, we investigated the prognostic impact of CHEK2 protein expression in stage pT1 UCB. This retrospective, single-center analysis was carried out in a cohort of patients initially diagnosed with a pT1 UCB between 2007 and 2015. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of CHEK2 was performed. CHEK2 expression was correlated with recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression analysis. The analysis included 126 patients (86% male, median age 71 years). Loss of immunohistochemical protein expression of CHEK2 (<10%) was associated with significantly worse PFS (p = 0.041). Likewise, CHEK2 loss identified a subgroup of patients with worse PFS in the high-risk groups with concomitant CIS (p = 0.044), multifocal tumors (p < 0.001) and tumor grading G3 according to WHO1973 (p = 0.009). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed both loss of CHEK2 expression (HR: 4.18, 95%-CI: 1.35-12.93;p = 0.013) and multifocal tumors (HR: 4.53, 95%-CI:1.29-15.92;p = 0.018) as the only predictive factors for progression. Loss of IHC expression of CHEK2 in pT1 UCB is an independent predictor for progression to muscle-invasive disease and is also associated with worse PFS. This could help to identify high-risk patients who would benefit from early cystectomy

Impact of the medical specialty on knowledge regarding multidrug-resistant organisms and strategies toward antimicrobial stewardship

Evidence is scarce on subject-specific knowledge of multidrug-resistant organisms and rational use of antibiotics. We aimed at evaluating attitude, perception, and knowledge about multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) and antibiotic prescribing among urologists versus other medical specialties. Within the MR2-study (Multiinstitutional Reconnaissance of practice with MultiResistant bacteria), a questionnaire was conducted targeting general surgeons, internists, gynecologists, and urologists in 18 German hospitals. The influence of medical specialty on predetermined endpoints was assessed by multivariable logistic regression models. With 456 evaluable questionnaires, the response rate was 43% (456/1061). Within seven workdays prior to survey, urologists prescribed antibiotics to > 5 patients more often than non-urologists (50.7 vs. 24.3%; p < 0.001). Urologists were more confident regarding dosage, frequency, and duration of antibiotic treatment (p = 0.038) as well as in interpreting antibiograms (p < 0.001). Both urologists and non-urologists had poor knowledge about antibiotic stewardship. Urologists were more confident regarding local resistance patterns (p < 0.001). However, local rates of ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli strains were correctly categorized by only 36.3 and 31.2% of urologists and non-urologists, respectively (p = 0.168). Compared to non-urologists, urologists more often acknowledged the use of broad-spectrum antibiotic agents as a problem, potentially resulting in increased resistance pattern (p = 0.036). Conversely, 31.5 and 30.7% of urologists and non-urologists (p = 0.424), respectively, would prescribe broad-spectrum antibiotics to a female patient with an uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Urologists did not attend more training courses regarding multidrug-resistance or antibiotic prescribing and did not perceive a better quality of discharge letters regarding MDRO. There is substantial need for advanced training regarding MDRO and antibiotic stewardship, regardless of medical specialty