Randomized Comparison of 64-Slice Single- and Dual-Source Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of a systematic approach to lower heart rate for coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography on diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice single- and dual-source CT.BackgroundCoronary CT angiography is often impaired by motion artifacts, so that routine lowering of heart rate is usually recommended. This is often conceived as a major limitation of the technique. It is expected that higher temporal resolution, such as with dual-source 64-slice CT, would allow diagnostic imaging even without systematic pre-treatment for lowering the heart rate.MethodsTwo hundred patients with suspected coronary artery disease were first randomized to either 64-slice single-source CT (n = 100) or dual-source CT (n = 100) for contrast-enhanced coronary artery evaluation. In each group, patients were further randomized to either receive systematic heart rate control (oral and intravenous beta-blockade for a target heart rate ≤60 beats/min) or receive no premedication. Evaluability of datasets and diagnostic accuracy were compared between groups against the results obtained from invasive angiography.ResultsSystematic pre-treatment lowered heart rate during CT coronary angiography by 10 beats/min. Heart rate control significantly improved evaluability in single-source CT (93% vs. 69% on a per-patient basis, p = 0.005), whereas it did not in dual-source CT (96% vs. 98%). In evaluable patients, sensitivity to detect the presence of at least 1 coronary stenosis by single-source CT was 86% and 79%, respectively, with and without heart rate control (p = NS). For dual-source CT, it was 100% and 95%, respectively (p = NS). The rate of correctly classified patients, defined as evaluable and correct classification as to the presence or absence of at least 1 coronary artery stenosis, was significantly improved by heart rate control in single-source CT (78% vs. 57%, p = 0.04), whereas there was no such influence in dual-source CT (87% vs. 93%).ConclusionsSystematic heart rate control significantly improves image quality for coronary visualization by 64-slice single-source CT, whereas image quality and diagnostic accuracy remain unaffected in dual-source CT angiography. Improved temporal resolution obviates the need for heart rate control

Assessment of coronary artery remodelling by dual-source CT: a head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound

Background: While it is widely assumed that coronary CT angiography permits detection and quantification of ‘positive remodelling’ of coronary atherosclerotic lesions, there is a paucity of data comparing CT with established reference methods. Objective: To assess the accuracy of dual-source CT for detecting positive versus absent or negative coronary artery remodelling of coronary atherosclerotic lesions as compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Methods: The datasets were evaluated of 38 patients referred for invasive coronary angiography and in whom an IVUS study of one coronary vessel was performed. Coronary CT angiography was performed within 24 h before invasive coronary angiography. Using dual-source CT (Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany), a contrast-enhanced volume dataset was acquired (120 kV, 400 mA/rot, collimation 2×64×0.6 mm, 60–80 ml contrast agent, intravenous). IVUS was performed using a 40 MHz IVUS catheter (Atlantis, Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, Massachusetts, USA) and motorised pullback at 0.5 mm/s. 48 corresponding non-calcified and partially calcified plaques within the coronary artery system were identified in both CT and IVUS using bifurcation points as fiducial markers. In CT datasets, multiplanar reconstructions orthogonal to the centre line of the coronary artery were rendered and cross-sectional vessel area was measured at the site of maximal narrowing as well as at a reference segment proximal to the lesion for each of the 48 plaques. The remodelling index (RI) was calculated by dividing the vessel area at the site of maximal narrowing by the area of the reference segment. Corresponding vessel areas and RIs were also determined in IVUS. Results: CT classified 41 plaques as positively remodelled (RI≥1.05) and seven as having either absent or negative remodelling (RI0.9, p<0.0001) than for remodelling indices (r=0.7, p<0.0001) with Bland–Altman analysis showing a systematic overestimation of vessel areas and RI in CT. Interobserver agreement was moderate for CT and IVUS measurements. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a RI of 1.1 in CT identified positively remodelled plaques in IVUS with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 78% (area under the curve=0.8, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.0). Using the standard cut-off point of 1.05 to identify positively remodelled plaques in CT resulted in a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 45%. Conclusion: Coronary CT angiography allows analysis of coronary artery remodelling. The degree of positive remodelling is typically overestimated by CT. A threshold of 1.1 for the RI may be optimal to classify plaques as ‘positively remodelled’ in coronary CT angiography

Left ventricular thrombus attenuation characterization in cardiac computed tomography angiography

BACKGROUND: Because of their similar visual appearance, differentiation of left ventricular thrombotic material and myocardial wall can be difficult in contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography. OBJECTIVE: We identified typical thrombi attenuation of left ventricular thrombi with the use of CT measurement. METHODS: Over a time period of 6 years; we retrospectively identified 31 patients who showed a left ventricular thrombus in CT angiography datasets. Patients underwent routine contrast cardiac CT to investigate coronary artery disease. CT attenuation of each thrombus was assessed in the 4-chamber view. CT densities were also determined in the ascending aorta, left ventricle, and myocardial wall both in the mid-septal and mid-lateral segments. The mean CT attenuation of thrombi and the difference between attenuation in thrombi, left ventricular cavity, and myocardial wall were determined. The ratio of attenuation values in thrombus versus aorta and myocardium versus aorta were also determined. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) CT attenuation of all left ventricular thrombi in 31 patients was 43.2 +/- 15.3 HU (range, 25-80 HU). Mean CT densities of septal and lateral myocardial wall were 102.9 +/- 23.1 HU (range, 63-155 HU) and 99.3 +/- 28.7 HU (range, 72-191 HU), respectively, and were thus significantly higher than the CT attenuation of thrombi (P &lt; 0.001). A threshold of 65 HU yielded a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 94%, 97%, 94%, and 97%, respectively, to differentiate thrombus from the myocardial wall. The mean ratio between CT attenuation of thrombus and CT attenuation within the ascending aorta was 0.11 +/- 0.05 (range, 0.04-0.23), which was significantly lower compared with the mean ratio between CT attenuation of the myocardial wall and the CT attenuation within the ascending aorta. CONCLUSION: CT attenuation within left ventricular thrombi was significantly lower than myocardial attenuation in CT angiography datasets. Assessment of CT attenuation may contribute to the differentiation of thrombi. (C) 2012 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. All rights reserved.Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Bonn, Germany [BMBF 01 EV 0708]Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Bonn, German

Accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered very low-dose coronary dual-source CT angiography using iterative reconstruction for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: comparison with invasive catheterization

Objective: To evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of very low-dose computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) for the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. Background: Iterative reconstruction (IR) has shown to substantially reduce image noise and hence permit the use of very low-dose data acquisition protocols in coronary CTA. Methods: Fifty symptomatic patients with an intermediate likelihood for coronary artery disease underwent coronary CTA (heart rate: 59 ± 5 bpm, prospectively ECG-triggered axial acquisition, 100 kV, 160 mAs, 2 × 128 × 0.6 mm collimation, 60 mL contrast, 6 mL/s) prior to invasive coronary angiography. CTA images were reconstructed using both standard filtered back projection (FBP) and a raw data-based IR algorithm [Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE), Siemens Healthcare]. Subjective image quality (four-point Likert scale from 0 = non-diagnostic to 3 = excellent image quality), image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), as well as the presence of coronary stenosis >50% were independently determined by two observers. Results: The mean dose–length product was 46.8 ± 3.5 mGy cm (estimated effective dose 0.66 ± 0.05 mSv). IR led to significantly improved objective image quality compared with FBP (image noise: 41 ± 12 vs. 49 ± 11 HU, P < 0.0001; CNR: 16 ± 8 vs. 12 ± 4, P < 0.0001; SNR: 13 ± 7 vs. 10 ± 3, P < 0.0001). Four coronary segments were not evaluable on FBP data, whereas all segments showed diagnostic image quality with IR. To detect significant coronary stenosis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 69% (11/16), 97% (175/180), 69% (11/16), and 97% (175/180) per vessel with FBP data sets, respectively. With IR data sets, the corresponding values were 81% (13/16), 97% (178/184), 68% (13/19), and 98% (178/181). These differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.617). Conclusions: Raw data-based IR significantly improves image quality in very low-dose prospectively ECG-triggered coronary dual-source CTA when compared with standard reconstruction using FBP