Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation as a Treatment Option for Aggressive Multiple Sclerosis

Opinion statement: Despite the development of several injectable or oral treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), it remains difficult to treat patients with aggressive disease, and many of these continue to develop severe disability. During the last two decades autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) has been explored with the goal to eliminate an aberrant immune system and then re-install a healthy and tolerant one from hematopoietic precursor cells that had been harvested from the patient prior to chemotherapy. Clinical studies have shown that aHSCT is able to completely halt disease activity in the majority of patients with aggressive RRMS. Research on the mechanisms of action supports that aHSCT indeed leads to renewal of a healthy immune system. Below we will summarize important aspects of aHSCT and mention the currently best-examined regime

Evaluation of a Novel Rapid Test System for the Detection of Specific IgE to Hymenoptera Venoms

Background. The Allergy Lateral Flow Assay (ALFA) is a novel rapid assay for the detection of sIgE to allergens. The objective of this study is the evaluation of ALFA for the detection of sIgE to bee venom (BV) and wasp venom (WV) in insect venom allergic patients. Methods. Specific IgE to BV and WV was analyzed by ALFA, ALLERG-O-LIQ, and ImmunoCAP in 80 insect venom allergic patients and 60 control sera. Sensitivity and specificity of ALFA and correlation of ALFA and ImmunoCAP results were calculated. Results. The sensitivity/specificity of ALFA to the diagnosis was 100%/83% for BV and 82%/97% for WV. For insect venom allergic patients, the Spearman correlation coefficient for ALFA versus ImmunoCAP was 0.79 for BV and 0.80 for WV. However, significant differences in the negative control groups were observed. Conclusion. ALFA represents a simple, robust, and reliable tool for the rapid detection of sIgE to insect venoms

Cerebrospinal fluid pressure dynamics reveal signs of effective spinal canal narrowing in ambiguous spine conditions

Spinal canal narrowing with consecutive spinal cord compression is considered a key mechanism in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). DCM is a common spine condition associated with progressive neurological disability, and timely decompressive surgery is recommended. However, the clinical and radiological diagnostic workup is often ambiguous, challenging confident proactive treatment recommendations. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure dynamics (CSFP) are altered by spinal canal narrowing. Therefore, we aim to explore the potential value of bedside CSFP assessments for qualitative and quantitative assessment of spinal canal narrowing in DCM. In this prospective case series, seven patients with DCM underwent bedside lumbar puncture with measurement of CSFP dynamics and routine CSF analysis (NCT02170155). The patients were enrolled when standard diagnostic algorithms did not permit a clear treatment decision. Measurements include baseline CSFP, cardiac-driven CSFP peak-to-trough amplitude (CSFPp), and the Queckenstedt's test (firm pressure on jugular veins) in neutral and reclined head position. From the Queckenstedt's test, proxies for craniospinal elastance (i.e., relative pulse pressure coefficient; RPPC-Q) were calculated analogously to infusion testing. CSFP metrics were deemed suspicious of canal narrowing when numbers were lower than the minimum value from a previously tested elderly spine-healthy cohort (N = 14). Mean age was 56 ± 13 years (range, 38-75; 2F); symptom severity was mostly mild to moderate (mean mJOA, 13.5 ± 2.6; range, 9-17). All the patients showed some extent of cervical stenosis in the MRI of unclear significance (5/7 following decompressive cervical spine surgery with an adjacent level or residual stenosis). Baseline CSFP was normal except for one patient (range, 4.7-17.4 mmHg). Normal values were found for CSFPp (0.4-1.3 mmHg) and the Queckenstedt's test in normal head positioning (9.-25.3 mmHg). During reclination, the Queckenstedt's test significantly decreased in one, and CSFPp in another case (>50% compared to normal position). RPPC-Q (0.07-0.19) aligned with lower values from spine-healthy (0.10-0.44). Routine CSF examinations showed mild total protein elevation (mean, 522 ± 108 mg/ml) without further evidence for the disturbed blood brain barrier. Intrathecal CSFP measurements allow discerning disturbed from normal CSFP dynamics in this population. Prospective longitudinal studies should further evaluate the diagnostic utility of CSFP assessments in DCM

Queckenstedt's test repurposed for the quantitative assessment of the cerebrospinal fluid pulsatility curve

PURPOSE Before the era of spinal imaging, presence of a spinal canal block was tested through gross changes in cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) provoked by manual compression of the jugular veins (referred to as Queckenstedt's test; QT). Beyond these provoked gross changes, cardiac-driven CSFP peak-to-valley amplitudes (CSFPp) can be recorded during CSFP registration. This is the first study to assess whether the QT can be repurposed to derive descriptors of the CSF pulsatility curve, focusing on feasibility and repeatability. METHOD Lumbar puncture was performed in lateral recumbent position in fourteen elderly patients (59.7±9.3 years, 6F) (NCT02170155) without stenosis of the spinal canal. CSFP was recorded during resting state and QT. A surrogate for the relative pulse pressure coefficient was computed from repeated QTs (i.e., RPPC-Q). RESULTS Resting state mean CSFP was 12.3 mmHg (IQR 3.2) and CSFPp was 1.0 mmHg (0.5). Mean CSFP rise during QT was 12.5 mmHg (7.3). CSFPp showed an average 3-fold increase at peak QT compared to the resting state. Median RPPC-Q was 0.18 (0.04). There was no systematic error in the computed metrics between the first and second QT. CONCLUSION This technical note describes a method to reliably derive, beyond gross CSFP increments, metrics related to cardiac-driven amplitudes during QT (i.e., RPPC-Q). A study comparing these metrics as obtained by established procedures (i.e., infusion testing) and by QT is warranted

Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Dynamics as a Bedside Test in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury to Assess Surgical Spinal Cord Decompression: Safety, Feasibility, and Proof-of-Concept

BACKGROUND: Sufficient and timely spinal cord decompression is a critical surgical objective for neurological recovery in spinal cord injury (SCI). Residual cord compression may be associated with disturbed cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) dynamics. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess whether intrathecal CSFP dynamics in SCI following surgical decompression are feasible and safe, and to explore the diagnostic utility. METHODS: Prospective cohort study. Bedside lumbar CSFP dynamics and cervical MRI were obtained following surgical decompression in N = 9 with mostly cervical acute-subacute SCI and N = 2 patients with non-traumatic SCI. CSFP measurements included mean CSFP, cardiac-driven CSFP peak-to-valley amplitudes (CSFPp), Valsalva maneuver, and Queckenstedt's test (firm pressure on jugular veins, QT). From QT, proxies for cerebrospinal fluid pulsatility curve were calculated (ie, relative pulse pressure coefficient; RPPC-Q). CSFP metrics were compared to spine-healthy patients. computer tomography (CT)-myelography was done in 3/8 simultaneous to CSFP measurements. RESULTS: Mean age was 45 ± 9 years (range 17-67; 3F), SCI was complete (AIS A, N = 5) or incomplete (AIS B-D, N = 6). No adverse events related to CSFP assessments. CSFP rise during QT was induced in all patients [range 9.6-26.6 mmHg]. However, CSFPp was reduced in 3/11 (0.1-0.3 mmHg), and in 3/11 RPPC-Q was abnormal (0.01-0.05). Valsalva response was reduced in 8/11 (2.6-23.4 mmHg). CSFP dynamics corresponded to CT-myelography. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive bedside lumbar CSFP dynamics in SCI following decompression are safe, feasible, and can reveal distinct patterns of residual spinal cord compression. Longitudinal studies are required to define critical thresholds of impaired CSFP dynamics that may impact neurological recovery and requiring surgical revisions

Increased cranio-caudal spinal cord oscillations are the cardinal pathophysiological change in degenerative cervical myelopathy.

INTRODUCTION Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of non-traumatic incomplete spinal cord injury, but its pathophysiology is poorly understood. As spinal cord compression observed in standard MRI often fails to explain a patient's status, new diagnostic techniques to assess DCM are one of the research priorities. Minor cardiac-related cranio-caudal oscillations of the cervical spinal cord are observed by phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) in healthy controls (HCs), while they become pathologically increased in patients suffering from degenerative cervical myelopathy. Whether transversal oscillations (i.e., anterior-posterior and right-left) also change in DCM patients is not known. METHODS We assessed spinal cord motion simultaneously in all three spatial directions (i.e., cranio-caudal, anterior-posterior, and right-left) using sagittal PC-MRI and compared physiological oscillations in 18 HCs to pathological changes in 72 DCM patients with spinal canal stenosis. The parameter of interest was the amplitude of the velocity signal (i.e., maximum positive to maximum negative peak) during the cardiac cycle. RESULTS Most patients suffered from mild DCM (mJOA score 16 (14-18) points), and the majority (68.1%) presented with multisegmental stenosis. The spinal canal was considerably constricted in DCM patients in all segments compared to HCs. Under physiological conditions in HCs, the cervical spinal cord oscillates in the cranio-caudal and anterior-posterior directions, while right-left motion was marginal [e.g., segment C5 amplitudes: cranio-caudal: 0.40 (0.27-0.48) cm/s; anterior-posterior: 0.18 (0.16-0.29) cm/s; right-left: 0.10 (0.08-0.13) cm/s]. Compared to HCs, DCM patients presented with considerably increased cranio-caudal oscillations due to the cardinal pathophysiologic change in non-stenotic [e.g., segment C5 amplitudes: 0.79 (0.49-1.32) cm/s] and stenotic segments [.g., segment C5 amplitudes: 0.99 (0.69-1.42) cm/s]). In contrast, right-left [e.g., segment C5 amplitudes: non-stenotic segment: 0.20 (0.13-0.32) cm/s; stenotic segment: 0.11 (0.09-0.18) cm/s] and anterior-posterior oscillations [e.g., segment C5 amplitudes: non-stenotic segment: 0.26 (0.15-0.45) cm/s; stenotic segment: 0.11 (0.09-0.18) cm/s] remained on low magnitudes comparable to HCs. CONCLUSION Increased cranio-caudal oscillations of the cervical cord are the cardinal pathophysiologic change and can be quantified using PC-MRI in DCM patients. This study addresses spinal cord oscillations as a relevant biomarker reflecting dynamic mechanical cord stress in DCM patients, potentially contributing to a loss of function

Increased cranio-caudal spinal cord oscillations are the cardinal pathophysiological change in degenerative cervical myelopathy

INTRODUCTION Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the most common cause of non-traumatic incomplete spinal cord injury, but its pathophysiology is poorly understood. As spinal cord compression observed in standard MRI often fails to explain a patient's status, new diagnostic techniques to assess DCM are one of the research priorities. Minor cardiac-related cranio-caudal oscillations of the cervical spinal cord are observed by phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) in healthy controls (HCs), while they become pathologically increased in patients suffering from degenerative cervical myelopathy. Whether transversal oscillations (i.e., anterior-posterior and right-left) also change in DCM patients is not known. METHODS We assessed spinal cord motion simultaneously in all three spatial directions (i.e., cranio-caudal, anterior-posterior, and right-left) using sagittal PC-MRI and compared physiological oscillations in 18 HCs to pathological changes in 72 DCM patients with spinal canal stenosis. The parameter of interest was the amplitude of the velocity signal (i.e., maximum positive to maximum negative peak) during the cardiac cycle. RESULTS Most patients suffered from mild DCM (mJOA score 16 (14-18) points), and the majority (68.1%) presented with multisegmental stenosis. The spinal canal was considerably constricted in DCM patients in all segments compared to HCs. Under physiological conditions in HCs, the cervical spinal cord oscillates in the cranio-caudal and anterior-posterior directions, while right-left motion was marginal [e.g., segment C5 amplitudes: cranio-caudal: 0.40 (0.27-0.48) cm/s; anterior-posterior: 0.18 (0.16-0.29) cm/s; right-left: 0.10 (0.08-0.13) cm/s]. Compared to HCs, DCM patients presented with considerably increased cranio-caudal oscillations due to the cardinal pathophysiologic change in non-stenotic [e.g., segment C5 amplitudes: 0.79 (0.49-1.32) cm/s] and stenotic segments [.g., segment C5 amplitudes: 0.99 (0.69-1.42) cm/s]). In contrast, right-left [e.g., segment C5 amplitudes: non-stenotic segment: 0.20 (0.13-0.32) cm/s; stenotic segment: 0.11 (0.09-0.18) cm/s] and anterior-posterior oscillations [e.g., segment C5 amplitudes: non-stenotic segment: 0.26 (0.15-0.45) cm/s; stenotic segment: 0.11 (0.09-0.18) cm/s] remained on low magnitudes comparable to HCs. CONCLUSION Increased cranio-caudal oscillations of the cervical cord are the cardinal pathophysiologic change and can be quantified using PC-MRI in DCM patients. This study addresses spinal cord oscillations as a relevant biomarker reflecting dynamic mechanical cord stress in DCM patients, potentially contributing to a loss of function

Quantifying neurodegeneration of the cervical cord and brain in degenerative cervical myelopathy : A multicentre study using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Simultaneous assessment of neurodegeneration in both the cervical cord and brain across multiple centres can enhance the effectiveness of clinical trials. Thus, this study aims to simultaneously assess microstructural changes in the cervical cord and brain above the stenosis in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a multicentre study. METHODS We applied voxelwise analysis with a probabilistic brain/spinal cord template embedded in statistical parametric mappin (SPM-BSC) to process multi parametric mapping (MPM) including effective transverse relaxation rate (R2*), longitudinal relaxation rate (R1), and magnetization transfer (MT), which are indirectly sensitive to iron and myelin content. Regression analysis was conducted to establish associations between neurodegeneration and clinical impairment. Thirty-eight DCM patients (mean age ± SD = 58.45 ± 11.47 years) and 38 healthy controls (mean age ± SD = 41.18 ± 12.75 years) were recruited at University Hospital Balgrist, Switzerland and Toronto Western Hospital, Canada. RESULTS Remote atrophy was observed in the cervical cord (p = 0.002) and in the left thalamus (0.026) of the DCM group. R1 was decreased in the periaqueductal grey matter (p = 0.014), thalamus (p = 0.001), corpus callosum (p = 0.0001), and cranial corticospinal tract (p = 0.03). R2* was increased in the primary somatosensory cortices (p = 0.008). Sensory impairments were associated with increased iron-sensitive R2* in the thalamus and periaqueductal grey matter in DCM. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous assessment of the spinal cord and brain revealed DCM-induced demyelination, iron deposition, and atrophy. The extent of remote neurodegeneration was associated with sensory impairment, highlighting the intricate and expansive nature of microstructural neurodegeneration in DCM, reaching beyond the stenosis level

Comparison of axial and sagittal spinal cord motion measurements in degenerative cervical myelopathy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The timing of decision-making for a surgical intervention in patients with mild degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is challenging. Spinal cord motion phase contrast MRI (PC-MRI) measurements can reveal the extent of dynamic mechanical strain on the spinal cord to potentially identify high-risk patients. This study aims to determine the comparability of axial and sagittal PC-MRI measurements of spinal cord motion with the prospect of improving the clinical workup. METHODS Sixty-four DCM patients underwent a PC-MRI scan assessing spinal cord motion. The agreement of axial and sagittal measurements was determined by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS The comparability of axial and sagittal PC-MRI measurements was good to excellent at all cervical levels (ICCs motion amplitude: .810-.940; p < .001). Significant differences between axial and sagittal amplitude values could be found at segments C3 and C4, while its magnitude was low (C3: 0.07 ± 0.19 cm/second; C4: -0.12 ± 0.30 cm/second). Bland-Altman analysis showed a good agreement between axial and sagittal PC-MRI scans (coefficients of repeatability: minimum -0.23 cm/second at C2; maximum -0.58 cm/second at C4). Subgroup analysis regarding anatomic conditions (stenotic vs. nonstenotic segments) and different velocity encoding (2 vs. 3 cm/second) showed comparable results. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates good comparability between axial and sagittal spinal cord motion measurements in DCM patients. To this end, axial and sagittal PC-MRI are both accurate and sensitive in detecting pathologic cord motion. Therefore, such measures could identify high-risk patients and improve clinical decision-making (ie, timing of decompression)

Comparison of axial and sagittal spinal cord motion measurements in degenerative cervical myelopathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The timing of decision-making for a surgical intervention in patients with mild degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is challenging. Spinal cord motion phase contrast MRI (PC-MRI) measurements can reveal the extent of dynamic mechanical strain on the spinal cord to potentially identify high-risk patients. This study aims to determine the comparability of axial and sagittal PC-MRI measurements of spinal cord motion with the prospect of improving the clinical workup. METHODS Sixty-four DCM patients underwent a PC-MRI scan assessing spinal cord motion. The agreement of axial and sagittal measurements was determined by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS The comparability of axial and sagittal PC-MRI measurements was good to excellent at all cervical levels (ICCs motion amplitude: .810-.940; p < .001). Significant differences between axial and sagittal amplitude values could be found at segments C3 and C4, while its magnitude was low (C3: 0.07 ± 0.19 cm/second; C4: -0.12 ± 0.30 cm/second). Bland-Altman analysis showed a good agreement between axial and sagittal PC-MRI scans (coefficients of repeatability: minimum -0.23 cm/second at C2; maximum -0.58 cm/second at C4). Subgroup analysis regarding anatomic conditions (stenotic vs. nonstenotic segments) and different velocity encoding (2 vs. 3 cm/second) showed comparable results. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates good comparability between axial and sagittal spinal cord motion measurements in DCM patients. To this end, axial and sagittal PC-MRI are both accurate and sensitive in detecting pathologic cord motion. Therefore, such measures could identify high-risk patients and improve clinical decision-making (ie, timing of decompression)