0272: True antihypertensive efficacy of sequential nephron blockade in patients with resistant hypertension and confirmed medication adherence

ObjectiveWe previously showed (Bobrie et al. J Hypertens 2012) that sequential-nephron blockade (SNB) was more effective than combined renin angiotensin system blockade (RB) for controlling BP in patients with resistant hypertension (RH). In this post-hoc analysis, we assessed medication adherence (MA) and its influence on the antihypertensive response to SNB/RB with a new combined scoring system.Design and MethodPts with daytime ambulatory SBP/DBP (dASBP/dADBP) >135 and/or 85mmHg, despite 4 week-treatment with irbesartan 300mg+HCTZ 12.5mg+amlodipine 5mg, were randomised either to SNB (i.e.+spironolactone 25mg, then +furosemide 20-40mg, then +amiloride 5mg, n=82) or RB (ramipril 5-10mg, then bisoprolol 5-10mg, RB group, n=82) for 12 weeks. MA was scored according to 4 criteria: (i) trough/peak plasma irbesartan (Irb) concentration (HPLC); (ii) urinary AcSDKP/creatinine ratio (UR) to evaluate ramipril intake; (iii) delay of last medication intake before visit (LMI); and (iv) pill counting (PC, %). One point of MA score was attributed to trough Irb >20ng/ml, UR >4nmol/mmol, LMI <24h and PC >80%. MA was defined as low (LMA, score <2), intermediate (IMA, score=3), and optimal (OMA, score=4).Results82 pts among 164 had OMA (46 SNB and 36 RB); 52 pts had IMA (23 SNB and 29 RB); and 30 pts had LMA (13 SNB and 17 RB) (inter-groups difference: NS). LMA pts were younger than SMA pts (50±11 vs. 56±10 yrs, p<0.011). In OMA pts, the difference in dASBP/dADBP between SNB vs RB was significant (–11 [–17;–6]/–6 [–9;–2] mmHg, p<0.0001/p=0.0025), favoring SNB, whereas in LMA pts the significant difference between the two groups was no more observed (–6 [–19;7]/–1 [–10;7] mmHg, p=0.352/p=0.7096).ConclusionThe major BP lowering effect of SNB vs. RB observed in pts with OMA is lost in pts LMA. Combined methods for assessing MA allow determining the true efficacy of antihypertensive strategies in patients with RH. Reinforcement of MA in RH pts is deemed necessary

Everolimus long-term use in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex: Four-year update of the EXIST-2 study

Objectives We examined the long-term effects of everolimus in patients with renal angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Methods Following favorable results from the double-blind core phase of EXIST-2 (NCT00790400), patients were allowed to receive open-label everolimus (extension phase). Patients initially randomly assigned to everolimus continued on the same dose;those who were receiving placebo crossed over to everolimus 10 mg/day. Dose modifications were based on tolerability. The primary end point was angiomyolipoma response rate, defined as a >= 50% reduction from baseline in the sum volume of target renal angiomyolipomas in the absence of new target angiomyolipomas, kidney volume increase of >20% from nadir, and angiomyolipoma-related bleeding grade >= 2. The key secondary end point was safety. Results Of the 112 patients who received >= 1 dose of everolimus, 58% (95% CI, 48.3% to 67.3%) achieved angiomyolipoma response. Almost all patients (97%) experienced reduction in renal lesion volumes at some point during the study period. Median duration of everolimus exposure was 46.9 months. Sixteen (14.3%) patients experienced angiomyolipoma progression at some point in the study. No angiomyolipoma-related bleeding or nephrectomies were reported. One patient on everolimus underwent embolization for worsening right flank pain. Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma lesion response was achieved in 48% of patients and skin lesion response in 68% of patients. The most common adverse events suspected to be treatment-related were stomatitis (42%), hypercholesterolemia (30.4%), acne (25.9%), aphthous stomatitis and nasopharyngitis (each 21.4%). Ten (8.9%) patients withdrew because of an adverse event. Renal function remained stable, and the frequency of emergent adverse events generally decreased over time. Conclusions Everolimus treatment remained safe and effective over approximately 4 years. The overall risk/benefit assessment supports the use of everolimus as a viable treatment option for angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex or sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Adjunctive everolimus therapy for tuberous sclerosis complex-associated refractory seizures: Results from the postextension phase of EXIST-3

Objective Epilepsy is highly prevalent in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Everolimus showed higher efficacy than placebo for seizures in the primary analysis of the EXIST-3 study. Here, we present the long-term outcomes of everolimus at the end of the postextension phase (PEP; data cutoff date: October 25, 2017). Methods After completion of the extension phase, patients were invited to continue everolimus in the PEP with everolimus (targeted trough concentration = 5-15 ng/ml, investigator-judged). Efficacy assessments included changes in seizure status during the PEP collected at 12-week intervals as parent/caregiver-reported data through a structured questionnaire. Results Among 361 patients, 343 entered the extension phase and 249 entered the PEP. After 12 weeks in the PEP, 18.9% (46/244) of patients were seizure-free since the last visit of the extension phase and 64.8% (158/244) had a stable/improved seizure status. At 24 weeks, the corresponding percentages were 18.2% (42/231) and 64.5% (149/231). Among 244 patients, the response rate was 32.8% (80/244) during the 12-week maintenance period of the core phase and 63.9% (156/244) at the end of the extension phase. Of the 149 responders at the end of the extension phase, 70.5% were seizure-free or had stable/improved seizure status. Long-term efficacy data showed persistent responses were observed in 183 of 361 patients (50.7%); 63.9% of these patients had a response that lasted at least 48 weeks. The most frequent Grade 3-4 adverse events (>= 2% incidence) reported throughout the study were pneumonia, status epilepticus, seizure, stomatitis, neutropenia, and gastroenteritis. Four patients died during the study. Significance The final analysis of EXIST-3 demonstrated the sustained efficacy of everolimus as adjunctive therapy in patients with TSC-associated treatment-refractory seizures, with a tolerable safety profile

The STIMULUS Program: Clinical Trials Evaluating Sabatolimab (MBG453) Combination Therapy in Patients (Pts) with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR-MDS) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Background: Therapy options for pts with HR-MDS or AML who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy (IC) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are limited, and clinical outcomes are poor. Novel, effective and tolerable therapies are urgently needed. TIM-3 is an inhibitory receptor that regulates both adaptive and innate immune responses. It is expressed on immune cells and on leukemic stem cells (LSCs) and blasts, but not on normal hematopoietic stem cells, making it a promising target in MDS and AML. Sabatolimab is a high-affinity, humanized, anti-TIM-3 IgG4 (S228P) antibody that simultaneously targets TIM-3 on immune and myeloid cells; this may restore immune function while also directly targeting LSCs and blasts. In preclinical studies, sabatolimab enhanced immune cell-mediated killing of AML cells in vitro. In early results from a ph 1b study (NCT03066648), sabatolimab + hypomethylating agents (HMAs; decitabine [Dec] or azacitidine [Aza]) demonstrated encouraging overall response rates in pts with high-/very high-risk MDS (+ Dec, 61%; + Aza, 57%) and newly diagnosed AML (+ Dec, 47%; + Aza, 29%), and a favorable safety profile. Study Design and Methods: The STIMULUS clinical trial program currently includes 3 trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of sabatolimab combination therapy in pts with HR-MDS or AML who are ineligible for IC or HSCT: STIMULUS-MDS1 (NCT03946670; ph 2) in pts with HR-MDS, STIMULUS-MDS2 (NCT04266301; ph 3) in pts with HR-MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia-2 (CMML-2), and STIMULUS-AML1 (NCT04150029; ph 2) in pts with AML. STIMULUS-MDS1 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ph 2 study evaluating the addition of sabatolimab to HMA in pts with HR-MDS. The 2 primary endpoints are complete remission (CR) rate and/or progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), leukemia-free survival, duration of CR, transfusion independence, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity. Approximately 120 pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive sabatolimab 400 mg or placebo IV Q2W (D8 and D22 of each 28-d cycle), + Dec 20 mg/m2 IV on D1-D5 or Aza 75 mg/m2 IV/SC on D1-D7, or D1-D5 + D8 and D9, of each 28-d cycle. STIMULUS-MDS2 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ph 3 study of sabatolimab in combination with Aza in pts with HR-MDS or CMML-2; the primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include measures related to pt quality of life, such as time to definitive deterioration of fatigue, improvement of fatigue, transfusion-free intervals, and physical/emotional functioning, as well as additional efficacy and safety parameters. Approximately 500 pts will be randomized 1:1 to sabatolimab 800 mg or placebo IV Q4W at D8 of each 28-d cycle + Aza using the same Aza dosing schedule as in STIMULUS-MDS1. Eligible pts for STIMULUS-MDS1 or -MDS2 are treatment-naïve adults with HR-MDS (Revised International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS-R] intermediate-/high-/very high-risk MDS). Pts with intermediate-risk MDS enrolling in STIMULUS-MDS1 are also required to have ≥5% bone marrow blasts at baseline. Pts with CMML-2 are eligible for STIMULUS-MDS2 only. STIMULUS-AML1 is a single-arm ph 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of sabatolimab in combination with Aza and venetoclax in pts with AML who are not candidates for IC or HSCT. Primary endpoints are incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (safety run-in) and CR rate. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability, CR/CRi rate, measurable residual disease-negative rate, durability of CR, relapse-free survival, EFS, OS, PK, transfusion independence, and immunogenicity. Eligible pts for STIMULUS-AML1 are adults with newly diagnosed AML who are not candidates for IC or HSCT, based on comorbidities (including renal and hepatic impairments, cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities), age (≥75 years old), or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or 3. STIMULUS-AML1 will enroll approximately 86 pts. Part 1 consists of a safety run-in (≈18 pts) across 2 escalating sabatolimab dose levels (400/800 mg IV Q4W on D8 of each 28-d cycle) in combination with Aza (75 mg/m2 IV/SC on D1-D7, or D1-D5 + D8 and D9) and venetoclax 400 mg PO QD. If this triple combination is assessed to be safe, part 2 (expansion) will open and enroll approximately 68 additional pts who will receive sabatolimab 800 mg Q4W in combination with Aza and venetoclax. Disclosures Zeidan: Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Celgene / BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CCITLA: Other; Taiho: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acceleron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; MedImmune/Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; BeyondSpring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Aprea: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Giagounidis:AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:SL VaxiGen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AML Global Portal: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hanmi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Yuhan: Consultancy, Honoraria; Chugai: Consultancy, Honoraria; BL&H: Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Miyazaki:Novartis Pharma KK: Honoraria; NIPPON SHINYAKU CO.,LTD.: Honoraria; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Honoraria; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Honoraria. Platzbecker:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Sekeres:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda/Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Malek:Novartis: Current Employment. Scott:Novartis: Current Employment. Niolat:Novartis: Current Employment. Peyrard:Novartis: Current Employment. Ma:Novartis: Current Employment. Kiertsman:Novartis: Current Employment. Stegert:Novartis AG: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Hertle:Novartis Pharma AG: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fenaux:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Santini:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acceleron: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Menarini: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria

Median GFR (A) and creatinine (B) over time.

<p>Medians are connected by lines, means are displayed as dots. Boxes are drawn from P25 to P75. Whiskers extend from P10 to P90. # indicates values that lie outside [P10, P90]. *Baseline assessment is the last performed before start of everolimus. Post-baseline laboratory assessments performed at unplanned schedule or more than 28 days after discontinuation of everolimus are not presented. Only results from central laboratory are included. Abbreviations: BL = baseline; GFR = glomerular filtration rate; P = percentile.</p

CONSORT flow diagram of patient disposition in the double-blind followed by open-label periods.

<p>^aPatients with angiomyolipoma progression were unblinded at the end of the double-blind phase, and patients who were on placebo were allowed to cross over to open-label everolimus.</p

Patient baseline characteristics.

<p>Patient baseline characteristics.</p