Supplementary Brief of Defendant-Appellant

Supplemental Brief for Defendant-Appellant submitted by Sam Sheppar

Reply Brief of Appellant on Motion for Leave to Appeal and Appeal as of Right

Reply Brief of Appellant on Motion for Leave to Appeal and Appeal as of Righ

Reply Brief of Appellant on Motion for Leave to Appeal and Appeal as of Right

Reply Brief of Appellant on Motion for Leave to Appeal and Appeal as of Righ

Management of chronic lateral instability due to lateral collateral ligament deficiency after total knee arthroplasty: a case report

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Lateral instability following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a rare condition with limited report of treatment options. The objective of this case presentation is to demonstrate the outcomes of different surgical procedures performed in a single patient with lateral collateral ligament (LCL) deficiency.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We present a case of chronic lateral instability due to LCL deficiency after primary TKA in a 47-year-old Caucasian woman with an obesity problem. Multiple treatment options have been performed in order to manage this problem, including the following: ligament reconstruction; combined ligament reconstruction and constrained implant; and rotating-hinge knee prosthesis that was the most recent surgery. All ligament reconstruction procedures failed within one year. The varus-valgus constrained prosthesis provided stability for six years.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Ligament reconstruction alone cannot provide enough stability for the treatment of chronic lateral instability in patients with obesity problems and LCL deficiency. When the reconstruction fails, a salvage procedure with rotating-hinge knee is still available.</p

Glenohumeral joint injection: a comparative study of ultrasound and fluoroscopically guided techniques before MR arthrography

To assess the variability in accuracy of contrast media introduction, leakage, required time and patient discomfort in four different centres, each using a different image-guided glenohumeral injection technique. Each centre included 25 consecutive patients. The ultrasound-guided anterior (USa) and posterior approach (USp), fluoroscopic-guided anterior (FLa) and posterior (FLp) approach were used. Number of injection attempts, effect of contrast leakage on diagnostic quality, and total room, radiologist and procedure times were measured. Pain was documented with a visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score. Access to the joint was achieved in all patients. A successful first attempt significantly occurred more often with US (94%) than with fluoroscopic guidance (72%). Leakage of contrast medium did not cause interpretative difficulties. With US guidance mean room, procedure and radiologist times were significantly shorter (p < 0.001). The USa approach was rated with the lowest pre- and post-injection VAS scores. The four image-guided injection techniques are successful in injection of contrast material into the glenohumeral joint. US-guided injections and especially the anterior approach are significantly less time consuming, more successful on the first attempt, cause less patient discomfort and obviate the need for radiation and iodine contrast