58 research outputs found

    La evasiĂłn en The House of Commons y el Congreso de los Diputados: un estudio intercultural

    Get PDF
    Falta palabras claveThe purpose of this dissertation is to carry out an analysis of political discourse used by politicians in the House of Commons1 in the United Kingdom and El Congreso de los Diputados2 in Spain. This analysis will consist of a comparative study of question and answer sessions in the British and Spanish Parliaments, with the idea of comparing and contrasting linguistic and cultural differences between the two nations mentioned, the United Kingdom and Spain. The concept of “face”, an idea proposed by Goffman (1955, 1967), and subsequently developed by Brown and Levinson (1978, 1987), and other authors such as R. Lakoff (1973), Leech (1983), and Fraser (1990) will be examined, and applied to political discourse. The phenomenon of equivocation, used in situations when people find themselves in a position where telling the truth could be hurtful and unnecessary, and telling a blatant lie could also be inappropriate, developed by Bavelas et al. (1990), will be thoroughly discussed and applied to the political debates analysed. The typology of equivocation put forward by Bull and Meyer (1993) will be thoroughly discussed, and we will see how the equivocation strategies which they propose are employed by the interviewees in the question and answer sessions of both the British and Spanish Parliaments. This will be followed by a discussion on the political similarities and differences between the two cultures, after which the pertinent conclusions will be drawn

    Trust and Political Life: the need to transform our democracy

    Get PDF
    One of the major concerns of contemporary public life centres on how much we can trust our politicians and the public institutions and services that they, with civil servants and political aides, are responsible for. This of course is not a new concern as, ever since we have had a system of representative parliamentary democracy, we have needed to trust our elected representatives and those they appoint, to undertake good governance on our behalf. However, in more recent years trust in UK national politicians and political life has been put under considerable stress. A 2011 Europe-wide Guardian/ICM opinion poll found that only 12% of those polled in the UK said they trusted politicians to ‘act with honesty and integrity’. Further, 66% stated they did not trust the UK government ‘to deal with the country’s problems’ (Glover, 2011). Political trust is central to democratic rule, and any decline in this can reduce the quality and stability of our democracy. Importantly, a reduction of trust in government and confidence in political institutions can damage the vitality of our democracy

    European Parliament Newsletter No. 1 - May 1974

    Get PDF

    European Parliament Newsletter No. 1 May 1974

    Get PDF

    The crown's marine estate- A sovereign wealth fund?

    Get PDF
    A response to the Treasury Select Committee investigation of the management of the Crown Estate, focusing on the marine estate and highlighting the Crown Estate's stewardship responsibilitie

    Misconduct by voters' own representatives does not affect voters' generalized political trust

    Get PDF
    One reason given for declining levels of trust in politicians and institutions is the incidence of scandals involving voters’ representatives. Politicians implicated in scandals, especially financial scandals, typically see their constituents’ support for them decrease. It has been suggested that these specific negative judgements about a representative’s misconduct spill over into constituents’ diffuse political trust in the system as a whole. We argue that the 2009 Parliamentary expenses scandal in the United Kingdom is the strongest yet-studied test of these scandal spillover effects in a non-experimental context. Yet, using a multilevel analysis of survey and representative implication data, we find no evidence for these effects. This is despite voters being aware of their MP’s scandal implication and this awareness affecting voters’ support for their own MP. We conclude that voters’ judgements about their constituency representatives are unlikely to affect their diffuse political trust

    Women2Win et la féminisation du Parti conservateur : les coulisses d'un débat

    No full text
    National audienceLe 5 mai 2005, le Parti conservateur subissait une troisiĂšme dĂ©faite consĂ©cutive face aux travaillistes, remportant seulement 32,3 % des voix et 198 siĂšges. Pour certains de ses militants, Women2Win et la fĂ©minisation du Parti conservateur : les coulisses d'un dĂ©bat 13 Observatoire de la sociĂ©tĂ© britannique, 6 | 2008 ce rĂ©sultat Ă©tait en grande partie la consĂ©quence de l'incapacitĂ© du parti Ă  se moderniser et Ă  offrir une image reprĂ©sentative de la sociĂ©tĂ© actuelle. L'absence quasi-totale, parmi les dĂ©putĂ©s conservateurs, de minoritĂ©s ethniques et de femmes, notamment, fut comparĂ©e avec les progrĂšs accomplis durant les dix annĂ©es prĂ©cĂ©dentes par le Parti travailliste dont le succĂšs, depuis 1997, avait largement Ă©tĂ© attribuĂ© Ă  l'Ă©lectorat fĂ©minin. C'est avec pour objectif de reconquĂ©rir les Ă©lectrices perdues en 1997 --et du mĂȘme coup tenter de reconquĂ©rir le pouvoir-- que certaines figures du Parti conservateur ont, fin novembre 2005, formĂ© Women2Win, groupe de pression destinĂ© Ă  promouvoir la sĂ©lection d'un plus grand nombre de candidates. Cet article se propose d'examiner les stratĂ©gies utilisĂ©es par ce dernier pour fĂ©miniser le partiainsi que les rĂ©sultats obtenus et les rĂ©sistances rencontrĂ©es. Nous verrons ainsi que les initiatives et les dĂ©bats suscitĂ©s par la question ont Ă©tĂ© en grande partie engagĂ©s dans les coulisses du parti, mĂȘme si la place grandissante occupĂ©e par les nouvelles technologies de l'information a partiellement contribuĂ© Ă  dĂ©placer cette derniĂšre sur le devant de la scĂšne

    The Parliamentary Conservative Party : the leadership elections of William Hague and Iain Duncan Smith

    Get PDF
    The aim of this research is to investigate the post1997 Parliamentary Conservative Party, with particular attention placed upon the Conservative Party leadership election of 1997 and 2001. The thesis uses these two leadership elections as a lens which can be utilised to focus upon and analyse the ideological disputations of contemporary British Conservatism. This is done by identifying the voting behaviour of Conservative parliamentarians in the two leadership elections and then by putting forwards a systemic explanation of the candidates’ support. Three sets of variables are tested. First, the thesis analyses socio-economic variables (i.e. the occupational and educational background of conservative parliamentarians). Second, the research considers the candidates’ support in relation to electoral and political variables (i.e. electoral vulnerability, political insider / outsider status, age and experience). Finally the research will evaluate the candidates’ support with regard to the ideological disposition of the candidates and their supporters. This requires an extensive exploration of the attitudes of Conservative parliamentarians with regard to the dominant ideological divides within contemporary post- Thatcherite Conservatism – economic policy (wet / dry), European policy (europhile / eurosceptic), and social, sexual and moral attitudes (social liberalism / social conservatism). By analysing the patterns of voting in relation to social background, political attributes and ideological disposition the thesis locates and interprets the differing motivational influences on voting behaviour. The thesis argues the ideological disposition of the candidates and their supporters was the crucial factor in both the leadership elections. The final round of the 1997 leadership election was a straight ideological battle between the europhile and eurosceptic wings of the parliamentary Conservative Party. This benefited the eurosceptic William Hague at the expense of the europhile Kenneth Clarke. In 2001 both Clarke and Portillo attracted support from across the ideological spectrum of the parliamentary party, suggesting that a section of the parliamentary party had moved away from ideologically driven voting behaviour. However, Iain Duncan Smith reaching the final ballot was due to the support of an ideologically cohesive group of traditional Thatcherite MPs and indicative of the continued significance of ideology on the direction of the Conservative party.EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo
    • 

    corecore