Impact of Delayed Admission to the Intensive Care Unit from the Emergency Department upon Sepsis Outcomes and Sepsis Protocol Compliance

Rationale. The impact of emergency department length of stay (EDLOS) upon sepsis outcomes needs clarification. We sought to better understand the relationship between EDLOS and both outcomes and protocol compliance in sepsis. Methods. We performed a retrospective observational study of septic patients admitted to the ICU from the ED between January 2012 and December 2015 in a single tertiary care teaching hospital. 287 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock were included. Study population was divided into patients with EDLOS < 6 hrs (early admission) versus ≥6 hours (delayed admission). We assessed the impact of EDLOS on hospital mortality, compliance with sepsis protocol, and resuscitation. Statistical significance was determined by chi-square test. Results. Of the 287 septic ED patients, 137 (47%) were admitted to the ICU in <6 hours. There was no significant in-hospital mortality difference between early and delayed admissions (p=0.68). Both groups have similar compliance with the 3-hour protocol (p=0.77). There was no significant difference in achieving optimal resuscitation within 12 hours (p=0.35). Conclusion. We found that clinical outcomes were not significantly different between early and delayed ICU admissions. Additionally, EDLOS did not impact compliance with the sepsis protocol with the exception of repeat lactate draw

A Predictive Model for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Mortality Using Red Cell Distribution Width

Methods. This observational retrospective cohort study includes 318 ARDS patients extracted from an ICU database between the years of 2001 and 2008. Clinical factors including age, gender, comorbidity score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio were chosen for the base model to predict ICU mortality. The RDW value at the time of ARDS diagnosis was added to the base model to determine if it improved its predictive ability. Results. 318 subjects were included; 113 (36%) died in the ICU. AUC for the base model without RDW was 0.76, and 0.78 following the addition of RDW [p=0.048]. The NRI was 0.46 (p=0.001), indicating that, in 46% of patients, the predictive probability of the model was improved by the inclusion of RDW. Conclusions. Adding RDW at time of ARDS diagnosis improved discrimination in a model using 4 clinical factors to predict ICU mortality

Clinical Manifestations of Subjects With the Non-Specific Pulmonary Function Test Pattern

Introduction: Non-specific pattern (NSP) is a subgroup of preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) that requires a normal total lung capacity measurement. NSP has been historically classified as being an obstructive lung disease pattern. There has been heightened interest and investigation into PRISm recently as it has been associated with an increased likelihood of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Given the inherent challenges of understanding the clinical significance of the NSP, the aim of this study was to further explore the clinical characteristics of patients with this pulmonary function test pattern. Material and methods: We identified 111 and 79 subjects using pre-bronchodilator (pre-BD) and post-bronchodilator (post-BD) values, respectively, that met criteria for NSP. The outpatient medical records were retrospectively reviewed for associated diagnoses that were then clustered into ‘obstructive’ or ‘non-obstructive’ groups based on the treating physician's primary pulmonary clinical diagnosis. Results: Within this NSP cohort, cough, wheezing and sputum production were documented more frequently in those with an obstructive lung disease diagnosis. Whether identified using pre-BD or post-BD spirometric values, those with NSP and a positive BD response were more likely to carry an obstructive lung disease diagnosis. Conclusion: Approximately one third of patients with NSP in this study were not given an obstructive lung disease diagnosis by their clinician, which supports the classification of NSP as not an exclusively obstructive lung disease pattern. However, the presence of supporting clinical symptoms, such as cough with sputum production and wheeze, and/or a positive BD response on PFT, support a diagnosis of obstruction in patients with NSP. Resumen: Introducción: El patrón inespecífico constituye un subgrupo de alteraciones de la espirometría con conservación de la relación (PRISm, siglas en inglés) que precisa de una medición de la capacidad pulmonar total normal; históricamente se ha clasificado como un patrón de neumopatía obstructiva. En épocas recientes se ha intensificado el interés en las PRISm y su investigación, ya que se ha asociado a un aumento de la probabilidad de aparición de una enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). Dadas las dificultades inherentes que conlleva interpretar la importancia clínica del patrón inespecífico, el objetivo de este estudio consistió en explorar con más detalle las características clínicas de los pacientes con dicho patrón en las pruebas de la función pulmonar. Material y métodos: Se identificaron 111 y 79 sujetos empleando valores prebroncodilatador y posbroncodilatador, respectivamente, que cumplieron los criterios de patrón inespecífico. Se revisaron retrospectivamente las historias clínicas ambulatorias para detectar diagnósticos asociados que después se agregaron en grupos «obstructivos» o «no obstructivos» en función del diagnóstico clínico pulmonar primario del médico. Resultados: En esta cohorte de pacientes con patrones inespecíficos, se documentó una mayor incidencia de tos, sibilancias y producción de esputo entre los que tenían un diagnóstico de neumopatía obstructiva. Los pacientes con patrón inespecífico y una respuesta positiva al broncodilatador, que hubiesen sido identificados con valores pre o posbroncodilatador, tenían más probabilidades de haber recibido un diagnóstico de neumopatía obstructiva. Conclusión: Aproximadamente un tercio de los pacientes con patrón inespecífico de este estudio no habían recibido un diagnóstico de neumopatía obstructiva, dato que avala no clasificar los patrones inespecíficos exclusivamente en las neumopatías obstructivas. Sin embargo, la presencia de síntomas clínicos indicativos, como tos productiva y sibilancias, o una respuesta positiva al broncodilatador en las pruebas de la función pulmonar, sustenta un diagnóstico de obstrucción en los pacientes con patrón inespecífico

TRPC6 inhibitor (BI 764198) to reduce risk and severity of ARDS due to COVID-19: a phase II randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of COVID-19 vaccinations, there remains a need to investigate treatments to reduce the risk or severity of potentially fatal complications of COVID-19, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the transient receptor potential channel C6 (TRPC6) inhibitor, BI 764198, in reducing the risk and/or severity of ARDS in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 and requiring non-invasive, supplemental oxygen support (oxygen by mask or nasal prongs, oxygen by non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal oxygen). METHODS: Multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase II trial comparing once-daily oral BI 764198 (n=65) with placebo (n=64) for 28 days (+2-month follow-up). PRIMARY ENDPOINT: proportion of patients alive and free of mechanical ventilation at day 29. Secondary endpoints: proportion of patients alive and discharged without oxygen (day 29); occurrence of either in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit admission or mechanical ventilation (day 29); time to first response (clinical improvement/recovery); ventilator-free days (day 29); and mortality (days 15, 29, 60 and 90). RESULTS: No difference was observed for the primary endpoint: BI 764198 (83.1%) versus placebo (87.5%) (estimated risk difference -5.39%; 95% CI -16.08 to 5.30; p=0.323). For secondary endpoints, a longer time to first response (rate ratio 0.67; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.99; p=0.045) and longer hospitalisation (+3.41 days; 95% CI 0.49 to 6.34; p=0.023) for BI 764198 versus placebo was observed; no other significant differences were observed. On-treatment adverse events were similar between trial arms and more fatal events were reported for BI 764198 (n=7) versus placebo (n=2). Treatment was stopped early based on an interim observation of a lack of efficacy and an imbalance of fatal events (Data Monitoring Committee recommendation). CONCLUSIONS: TRPC6 inhibition was not effective in reducing the risk and/or severity of ARDS in patients with COVID-19 requiring non-invasive, supplemental oxygen support. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04604184

Serious adverse events in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the placebo arms of 6 clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal interstitial lung disease characterized by irreversible loss of lung function and an unpredictable course of disease progression. METHODS: The safety data for patients with IPF who received placebo in 6 clinical trials were pooled to examine the categories and frequencies of serious adverse events (SAEs) in this population. RESULTS: In 1082 patients with IPF who received placebo, 673 SAEs were reported. Of these, 93 SAEs resulted in death (8.6% of patients). Respiratory-related conditions were the most frequently reported SAE (225 events, 16.33 per 100 patient-exposure years [PEY]), followed by infections and infestations (136 events, 9.87 per 100 PEY) and cardiac disorders (79 events, 5.73 per 100 PEY); these categories also had the most fatal outcomes (60, 10, and 10 deaths, respectively). The most frequently reported fatal respiratory-related SAEs were IPF and respiratory failure (38 and 11 patients, respectively), and the most frequently reported fatal infections and infestations and cardiac disorders were pneumonia (5 patients) and myocardial infarction (3 patients), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis has value as a comparator for safety in future studies of IPF and provides insights in the natural evolution of both IPF and common comorbidities.status: publishe

Real-World Practice Patterns for Prevention and Management of Potential Adverse Events with Pirfenidone in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

<p></p><p><strong>Article full text</strong></p> <p><br> The full text of this article can be found <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41030-018-0056-8"><b>here</b>.</a><br> <br> <strong>Provide enhanced digital features for this article</strong><br> If you are an author of this publication and would like to provide additional enhanced digital features for your article then please contact <u>[email protected]</u>.<br> <br> The journal offers a range of additional features designed to increase visibility and readership. All features will be thoroughly peer reviewed to ensure the content is of the highest scientific standard and all features are marked as ‘peer reviewed’ to ensure readers are aware that the content has been reviewed to the same level as the articles they are being presented alongside. Moreover, all sponsorship and disclosure information is included to provide complete transparency and adherence to good publication practices. This ensures that however the content is reached the reader has a full understanding of its origin. No fees are charged for hosting additional open access content.<br> <br> Other enhanced features include, but are not limited to:<br> • Slide decks<br> • Videos and animations<br> • Audio abstracts<br> • Audio slides<u></u></p><br><p></p

Anti-fibrotic therapy and lung transplant outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Background: It is unclear whether continuing anti-fibrotic therapy until the time of lung transplant increases the risk of complications in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Objectives: To investigate whether the time between discontinuation of anti-fibrotic therapy and lung transplant in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis affects the risk of complications. Methods: We assessed intra-operative and post-transplant complications among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who underwent lung transplant and had been treated with nintedanib or pirfenidone continuously for ⩾ 90 days at listing. Patients were grouped according to whether they had a shorter (⩽ 5 medication half-lives) or longer (> 5 medication half-lives) time between discontinuation of anti-fibrotic medication and transplant. Five half-lives corresponded to 2 days for nintedanib and 1 day for pirfenidone. Results: Among patients taking nintedanib ( n  = 107) or pirfenidone ( n  = 190), 211 (71.0%) had discontinued anti-fibrotic therapy ⩽ 5 medication half-lives before transplant. Anastomotic and sternal dehiscence occurred only in this group (anastomotic: 11 patients [5.2%], p  = 0.031 vs patients with longer time between discontinuation of anti-fibrotic medication and transplant; sternal: 12 patients [5.7%], p  = 0.024). No differences were observed in surgical wound dehiscence, length of hospital stay, or survival to discharge between groups with a shorter versus longer time between discontinuation of anti-fibrotic therapy and transplant. Conclusion: Anastomotic and sternal dehiscence only occurred in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who discontinued anti-fibrotic therapy < 5 medication half-lives before transplant. The frequency of other intra-operative and post-transplant complications did not appear to differ depending on when anti-fibrotic therapy was discontinued. Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04316780: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT0431678

sj-docx-1-tar-10.1177_17534666231165912 – Supplemental material for Anti-fibrotic therapy and lung transplant outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-tar-10.1177_17534666231165912 for Anti-fibrotic therapy and lung transplant outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis by Todd L. Astor, Hilary J. Goldberg, Laurie D. Snyder, Andrew Courtwright, Ramsey Hachem, Tahuanty Pena, Lorenzo Zaffiri, Gerard J. Criner, Marie M. Budev, Tany Thaniyavarn, Thomas B. Leonard, Shaun Bender, Aliaa Barakat, Janis L. Breeze and Peter LaCamera in Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease</p