29 research outputs found

    The influence of topography on vertical velocity of air in relation to severe storms near the Southern Andes Mountains

    Get PDF
    On the basis of 180 storms which took place between 2004 and 2011 over the province of Mendoza (Argentina) near to the Andes Range at southern mid-latitudes, we consider those registered in the northern and central crop areas (oases). The regions affected by these storms are currently protected by an operational hail mitigation project. Differences with previously reported storms detected in the southern oasis are highlighted. Mendoza is a semiarid region situated roughly between 32S and 37S at the east of the highest Andes top. It forms a natural laboratory where different sources of gravity waves, mainly mountain waves, occur. In this work, we analyze the effects of flow over topography generating mountain waves and favoring deep convection. The joint occurrence of storms with hail production and mountain waves is determined from mesoscale numerical simulations, radar and radiosounding data. In particular, two case studies that properly represent diverse structures observed in the region are considered in detail. A continuous wavelet transform is applied to each variable and profile to detect the main oscillation modes present. Simulated temperature profiles are validated and compared with radiosounding data. Each first radar echo, time and location are determined. The necessary energy to lift a parcel to its level of free convection is tested from the Convective Available Potential Energy and Convection Inhibition. This last parameter is compared against the mountain waves' vertical kinetic energy. The time evolution and vertical structure of vertical velocity and equivalent potential temperature suggest in both cases that the detected mountain wave amplitudes are able to provide the necessary energy to lift the air parcel and trigger convection. A simple conceptual scheme linking the dynamical factors taking place before and during storm development is proposed.Fil: de la Torre, Alejandro. Universidad Austral. Facultad de IngenierĂ­a; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas; ArgentinaFil: Pessano, H.. Universidad Tecnologica Nacional. Facultad Regional San Rafael; ArgentinaFil: Hierro, Rodrigo Federico. Universidad Austral. Facultad de IngenierĂ­a; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas; ArgentinaFil: Santos, J. R.. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Llamedo Soria, Pablo Martin. Universidad Austral. Facultad de IngenierĂ­a; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas; ArgentinaFil: Alexander, Pedro Manfredo. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de FĂ­sica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas; Argentin

    Target antigen of monoclonal reagent S5.7: comparison with T3 antigen

    No full text
    S5.7 recognizes a 20 kD cell surface protein which is present on T lymphocytes. S5.7 binds to a nonglycosylated protein, which can be labeled by cell-surface radioiodination and by a hydrophobic reagent [125I]-iodo-5-naphthyl-1-azide (INA). As the T-lymphocyte-specific T3 complex was found to contain a nonglycosylated 20 kD species, and since this 20 kD T3 form can be labeled preferentially by INA, a comparison between T3 and S5.7 was made. Isoelectric focusing experiments showed, however, that the two proteins are different. Moreover, the S5.7 monoclonal antibody does not block CML, is not mitogenic, reacts with immature cells of several hemopoietic lineages, and differs in that respect from anti-T3 monoclonal antibodie
    corecore