47 research outputs found
E-cadherin adhesion molecule and syndecan-1 expression in various thyroid pathologies
Cadherins and syndecans are transmembrane glycoproteins implicated in cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion. Impairment of cadherin and syndecan mediated adhesion is likely to constitute one of the main factors leading to the reduced cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion characteristics of tumor cells and play a pivotal role in the acquisition of invasive and metastatic proprieties by neoplastic epithelial cells. Aim: To elucidate the role and alterations of syndecan-1 expression in comparison with those of E-cadherin in normal and pathological thyroid glands (TG). Methods: A total of 55 TG carcinomas, 40 TG adenomas, 40 cases of hyperplastic TG disorders and 20 cases of normal TG autopsy samples, were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The staining intensity, and localization of syndecan-1 and E-cadherin in sequential sections were examined, and semi-quantified. Results: Immunostaining of syndecan-1 and E-cadherin was strong in normal follicular TG epithelial cells, and located mainly in basolateral membrane. No significant change was seen in either molecule in hyperplastic TG disorders compared with TG adenomas. A significant reduction in expression of both syndecan-1 and E-cadherin was seen in well-differentiated TG carcinomas as compared with normal TG epithelium (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.032, respectively). Similarly, there was a significant reduction of both molecules expression in poorly differentiated and anaplastic TG carcinomas compared to well differentiated tumors (syndecan-1: p = 0.0037; and E-cadherin: p = 0.075). Conclusion: Decreased E-cadherin and syndecan-1 expression along with decreasing cellular differentiation may be involved in the complex mechanism of progression of TG pathology.ΠΠ°Π΄Π³Π΅ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ°Π½Ρ β ΡΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π³Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΈΠ½Ρ, ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°Π΄Π³Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π°Π΄Π³Π΅Π·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊ
ΠΊ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΊΡΡ. ΠΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ» ΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ»Ρ Π² ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Π²Π°Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ
ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π° Π·Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ: ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°-1
ΠΈ Π-ΠΊΠ°Π΄Π³Π΅ΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π² ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ Π² Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ: ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΡΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Π·ΡΠ»ΠΈ Ρ 55 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ (Π©Π), 40 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² β Ρ Π°Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π©Π, 40 β Ρ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π©Π, ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΌ ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 20 ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ Π©Π (Π°ΡΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡ). Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ:
ΡΠΊΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°-1 ΠΈ Π-ΠΊΠ°Π΄Π³Π΅ΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π² Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΠ»Π»ΠΈΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π©Π Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ,
Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π² Π±Π°Π·ΠΎΠ»Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Π΅. ΠΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΡΠΊΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ
ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ» ΠΏΡΠΈ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π°Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π©Π. ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½Π°
Π² ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Ρ
Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π©Π (p = 0,0001 ΠΈ p = 0,032
ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ), Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Π°Π½Π°ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ
ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΡΠΌΠΈ Π©Π (p = 0,0037 Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°-1 ΠΈ p = 0,075 Π΄Π»Ρ Π-ΠΊΠ°Π΄Π³Π΅ΡΠΈΠ½Π°). ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ: ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ
ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠ°Π½Π°-1 ΠΈ Π-ΠΊΠ°Π΄Π³Π΅ΡΠΈΠ½Π°, ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊ ΠΊ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π©Π
Molecular profiling and genomic microarrays in prostate cancer
In the present review article a global approach regarding the usefulness of genomic microarrays in prostate cancer management, is attempted. Cancer is a multistep process of mutations in key regulatory genes and epigenetic alterations that result in loss of balanced gene expression. A complete knowledge of the interaction between the genetic variability of the neoformation (tumor profiling) and the genetic variability of the host (inherited genome profiling), will be able to determine the better strategy against the cancer and the less toxicity for the patient. Alterations in the sequence of the hormone binding domain of the androgen receptor as well as mutations in some genes, determine radioresistance and resistance or sensitivity to some chemotherapeutic drugs. New therapies using monoclonal antibodies directed against specific extracellular binding domains of some receptors are based on molecular alterations observed in tumors.Π ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² Π΄Π»Ρ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ.
Π Π°ΠΊ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΌΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π³Π΅Π½Π°Ρ
ΠΈ ΡΠΏΠΈΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΊ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ±Π°Π»Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ². Π€ΡΠ½Π΄Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°Π±Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ
ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΡΡ
ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠΊ (ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ) ΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ°Π±Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ Ρ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΈΠ½Π° (Π½Π°ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠΉ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΡΠΉ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Ρ) ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠΏΡΡ
ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ. ΠΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ° Π°Π½Π΄ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π° Π½Π°ΡΡΠ΄Ρ Ρ ΠΌΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡ
ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊ Π»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊ ΡΡΠ΄Ρ Ρ
ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ
Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π» ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π²Π½Π΅ΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ΄Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ²
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π½Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ
Amplification and co-regulators of androgen receptor gene in prostate cancer
Prostate cancer isthe second most common malignancy among males after lung cancer. The growth of prostate cancer cells depends
on the presence of androgens, a group ofsteroid hormones that include testosterone and its more active metabolite dihydrotestosterone.
Most prostate cancers are androgen-dependent and respond to the antiandrogens or androgen-deprivation therapy. However,
the progression to an androgen-independent stage occurs frequently. Possible mechanisms that could be involved in the development
of hormone resistant prostate cancer causes including androgen receptor (AR) mutations, AR amplification/over expression,
interaction between AR and other growth factors, and enhanced signaling in a ligand-independent manner are discussed
Selenium in serum and neoplastic tissue in breast cancer: correlation with CEA
Trace element selenium (Se) is regarded to be a breast cancer preventive factor involved in multiple protective pathways. In all, 80 women with breast cancer who underwent a radical mastectomy were enrolled in the study. Serum Se and carcinoembryonic antigen levels were measured using a fluorometric and IRMA assay, respectively. Se tissue concentration was determined by a tissue extracting fluorometric assay. For statistical analysis purposes t-test was used and P-values <0.001 were regarded as statistically significant. Serum Se was 42.5Β±7.5βΞΌgβlβ1 in breast cancer patients and 67.6Β±5.36βΞΌgβlβ1 in the age-matched control group of healthy individuals. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen in patients was 10Β±1.7βUβmlβ1 (normal <2.5βUβmlβ1 in nonsmokers/<3.5βUβmlβ1 in smokers). A statistically significant difference was found for both serum Se and CEA between two groups studied (P<0.001). Neoplastic tissue Se concentration was 2660Β±210βmgβgβ1 tissue; its concentration in the adjacent non-neoplastic tissue was 680Β±110βmgβgβ1 tissue (P<0.001). An inverse relationship between Se and CEA serum levels was found in the two groups studied (r=β0.794). There was no correlation between serum/tissue Se concentration and stage of the disease. The decrease in serum Se concentration as well as its increased concentration in the neoplastic breast tissue is of great significance. These alterations may reflect part of the defence mechanisms against the carcinogenetic process
Glycoprotein CD44 expression in benign, premalignant and malignant epithelial lesions of the larynx: An immunohistochemical study including correlation with Rb, p53, Ki-67 and PCNA
CD44 is an integral membrane glycoprotein that has diverse functions in cell-cell and cell-substrate interactions. It has been suggested that it may be a determinant of metastatic and invasive behavior in carcinomas. The immunohistochemical expression of CD44 was examined in a series of 34 squamous cell carcinomas, 13 in situ carcinomas, 35 cases with various degrees of epithelial dysplasia, 10 papillomas and 17 cases of keratosis. We used the monoclonal mouse antihuman phagocytic glycoprotein-1 CD44 (clone DF 1485), on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. CD44 expression was correlated with the expression of Rb and p53 proteins, with the proliferative indices Ki-67 and PCNA as well as with conventional clinicopathological data. The mean value of CD44 expression was 78.84 in squamous cell carcinomas, 78.04 in in situ carcinomas, 54.93 in dysplasia, 26.8 in papillomas and 24.97 in keratosis. There was no significant difference of CD44 expression between in situ and invasive carcinomas. However, a strong difference of reaction between carcinomas and the other cases was observed. CD44 expression was statistically higher in dysplastic lesions than the cases of keratosis (p<0.0001) and papillomas (p=0.01). In the group of invasive carcinomas, CD44 expression was statistically correlated with pRb (p=0.011), while in preinvasive lesions it was correlated with PCNA (p=0.016). The relationship with the degree of dysplasia or grade of carcinoma and p53 protein expression was insignificant.These observations suggest that CD44 expression may be involved in the multiple mechanism of the development and progression of laryngeal lesions and may help to predict the risk of transformation of the benign or precancerous lesions to cancer
Glycoprotein CD44 expression in benign, premalignant and malignant epithelial lesions of the larynx. An immunohistochemical study including
CD44 is an integral membrane glycoprotein
that has diverse functions in cell-cell and cell-substrate
interactions. It has been suggested that it may be a
determinant of metastatic and invasive behavior in
carcinomas. The immunohistochemical expression of
CD44 was examined in a series of 34 squamous cell
carcinomas, 13 in situ carcinomas, 35 cases with various
degrees of epithelial dysplasia, 10 papillomas and 17
cases of keratosis. We used the monoclonal mouse antihuman
phagocytic glycoprotein-1 CD44 (clone DF
1485), on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.
CD44 expression was correlated with the expression of
Rb and p53 proteins, with the proliferative indices Ki-67
and PCNA as well as with conventional clinicopathological
data. The mean value of CD44 expression
was 78.84 in squamous cell carcinomas, 78.04 in in situ
carcinomas, 54.93 in dysplasia, 26.8 in papillomas and
24.97 in keratosis. There was no significant difference of
CD44 expression between in situ and invasive
carcinomas. However, a strong difference of reaction
between carcinomas and the other cases was observed.
CD44 expression was statistically higher in dysplastic
lesions than the cases of keratosis (p<0.0001) and
papillomas (p=0.01). In the group of invasive
carcinomas, CD44 expression was statistically correlated
with pRb (p=0.011), while in preinvasive lesions it was
correlated with PCNA (p=0.016). The relationship with
the degree of dysplasia or grade of carcinoma and p53
protein expression was insignificant.
These observations suggest that CD44 expression
may be involved in the multiple mechanism of the
development and progression of laryngeal lesions and
may help to predict the risk of transformation of the
benign or precancerous lesions to cancer
Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (gelatinase B) in benign, premalignant and malignant laryngeal lesions
The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a
family of proteolytic zinc-containing enzymes, which
are responsible for the breakdown of the extracellular
matrix components in pathological and physiological
conditions. They are involved in basement membrane
disruption, stroma and blood vessel penetration,
metastasis and more recently there is evidence that they
participate in tumor growth and angiogenic events.
Matrix metalloproteinase 2 and 9 (MMP 2 and 9) belong
to the gelatinases, a subgroup of MMPs, and have the
capacity to degrade the triple helix type IV collagen of
basal lamina of the basement membrane. With the
present study, we tried to demonstrate the expression of
MMP-9 immunohistochemically, comparatively in
benign, premalignant and malignant lesions of the
larynx. We studied 154 laryngeal lesions including 55
squamous cell carcinomas, 8 in situ carcinomas, 54 cases
of dysplasia (of low and intermediate grade), 13
papillomas and 24 cases of keratosis. Overexpression of
MMP 9 was observed in 74.4% and 50% in invasive and
in situ squamous cell carcinomas respectively. In
dysplastic cases, in papillomas and in keratoses the
percentage of overexpression was 62.9%, 61.53% and
54.16% respectively and the expression of MMP-9 was significantly higher in invasive squamous cell
carcinomas compared to dysplasias (p=0.000004). Also
significantly higher was the expression of MMP-9 in
dysplastic cases compared to papillomas (p=0.023). The
MMP-9 expression was related neither to survival nor to
the other available clinicopathological parameters
(tumor size, grade, clinical stage, lymph node status and
patient age). In conclusion, our study indicates that the
expression of MMP-9 is up-regulated in a stepwise
fashion, with two main steps, the first one, when a
dysplastic lesion evolves and the next one, when the
dysplasia progresses to invasive carcinoma