How do cardiologists select patients for dual antiplatelet therapy continuation beyond 1 year after a myocardial infarction? Insights from the EYESHOT Post-MI Study

Background: Current guidelines suggest to consider dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) continuation for longer than 12 months in selected patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Hypothesis: We sought to assess the criteria used by cardiologists in daily practice to select patients with a history of MI eligible for DAPT continuation beyond 1 year. Methods: We analyzed data from the EYESHOT Post-MI, a prospective, observational, nationwide study aimed to evaluate the management of patients presenting to cardiologists 1 to 3 years from the last MI event. Results: Out of the 1633 post-MI patients enrolled in the study between March and December 2017, 557 (34.1%) were on DAPT at the time of enrolment, and 450 (27.6%) were prescribed DAPT after cardiologist assessment. At multivariate analyses, a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with multiple stents and the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) resulted as independent predictors of DAPT continuation, while atrial fibrillation was the only independent predictor of DAPT interruption for patients both at the second and the third year from MI at enrolment and the time of discharge/end of the visit. Conclusions: Risk scores recommended by current guidelines for guiding decisions on DAPT duration are underused and misused in clinical practice. A PCI with multiple stents and a history of PAD resulted as the clinical variables more frequently associated with DAPT continuation beyond 1 year from the index MI

Multiple and Contemporary Coronary Thrombosis inspite of Low Platelet Function Response

We are reporting a clinical case of a 78-year-old male who had oppressive chest pain at rest, which regressed with the intake of sublingual nitrates. Coronary angiography showed a chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery, a normal circumflex, a hypoplasic right coronary artery and a Cardiac Magnetic Resonance showing vital tissue in anterior wall. During the procedure of CTO-PCI on LAD, patient developed multiple and contemporary coronary thrombosis in spite of low platelet reactivity, which was assessed by using Multiplate. A manual thrombectomy was performed with a good final result only after drug eluting stents (DES) implantation

CoreValve repositioning complicated by entrapment of snare in the valve delivery anchor

We report on the treatment of a patient, with severe peri-prosthetic regurgitation, following CoreValve implantation too low into the left ventricle outflow tract, adjusted by 'snaring' prosthesis. This bail-out manoeuvre allows the appropriate positioning of the prosthesis but was complicated by the entrapment of the goose-neck loop in the valve delivery anchor and was solved successfully with a second different device

Five Years on Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy DES Thrombosis After Clopidogrel Withdrawal

Drug-eluting stents (DES) have a moderately higher incidence of stent thrombosis compared to bare metal stents (BMS) and very late DES thrombosis has been frequently described. We report a case of a 66 year-old male who experienced very late stent thrombosis at 5 years after paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) implantation and 3 days after clopidogrel withdrawal. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) performed during the index procedure showed that the previously implanted PES was undersized. Since the patient could not take clopidogrel, we treated him with only a noncompliant balloon (3.0 x 15 mm) with optimal expansion as confirmed by IVUS. This case report describes a patient who continued clopidogrel treatment for 5 years and was probably protected from a procedural failure. During the current hospitalization, the patient was found to be a responder to clopidogrel after a platelet function assessment with Multiplate (Dynabyte Informationssysteme GmbH, Munich, Germany)

Bleeding versus thrombosis: role of short DAPT in complex lesions

Therapy with dual antiplatelet agents, defined as the combination of a platelet P2Y12 inhibitor and aspirin, is required to prevent thrombotic complications, after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation. Usually current guidelines recommend administration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous revascularization with drug-eluting stent (DES) for a period of at least 12 months or for 6 to 12 months in patients not at high risk. Nevertheless, the treatment of stable/unstable coronary artery disease with DES implantation increasing largely, the optimal duration of DAPT is still unclear. The duration of DAPT after coronary stenting has been evaluated in recent randomized studies with conflicting results. The administration of long period of DAPT is a strategy to reduce thrombosis events but largely increase the hemorrhagic ones. Otherwise, shorter DAPT period is protective about bleeds with consequently increased ischemic events. In addition, as new DES carry a lower risk of stent thrombosis (ST) compared with the first-generation DES and possibly even bare-metal stents, a shift toward better protection from ST may have an effect on the duration and the intensity of DAPT. Whether the duration of DAPT should be shorter or longer than the currently recommended 6 to 12 months is analyzed in this review, drawing on results from the most recent studies and meta-analysis

Comparison of high reloading ROsuvastatin and Atorvastatin pretreatment in patients undergoing elective PCI to reduce the incidence of MyocArdial periprocedural necrosis. The ROMA II trial

Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare a reloading dose of Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin administered within 24 h before coronary angioplasty (PCI) in reducing the rate of periprocedural myonecrosis and major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients on chronic statin treatment undergoing elective PCI. Background: Elective PCI may be complicated with elevation of cardiac biomarkers. Several studies suggested that pretreatment with statins may be associated with a reduction in periprocedural myocardial necrosis. Methods: Three hundred and fifty patients with stable angina who underwent elective PCI were randomly assigned to receive a pre-procedural reloading dose of Rosuvastatin (40 mg) (Rosuvastatin Group-RG n = 175) or Atorvastatin (80 mg) (Atorvastatin Group-AG n = 175) and a control group on chronic statin therapy without reloading (Control-Group-CG). The primary end-point was periprocedural myocardial necrosis and the occurrence of MACCE at 30-day,6-12 month follow-up. Also we evaluate the rise of periprocedural Troponin T serum levels >3x the upper limit of normal. Results: Twelve and 24-hour post-PCI Creatine Kinase Muscle and Brain (CK-MB) elevation >3x occurred more frequently in the CG than in the RG and in the AG (at 24-h: 25.0 vs 7.1; p = 0.003 and 25.0 vs 6.1; p = 0.001). At 30-day, 6-and 12-month follow-up the incidence of cumulative MACCE was higher in CG than in the RG or AG (at 12-month: 41.0% vs 11.4% vs 12.0%; p = 0.001). There was no difference between the RG and AG in terms of myocardial post-procedural necrosis and MACCE occurrence at follow-up. Conclusions: High-dose statin reloading improves procedural and long term clinical outcomes in stable patients on chronic statin therapy. Both Rosuvastatin and Atorvastatin showed similar beneficial effects on procedural and long-term outcomes. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved

Single-staged compared with multi-staged PCI in multivessel NSTEMI patients. the SMILE trial

Background: A lack of clarity exists about the role of complete coronary revascularization in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Objectives: The aim of our study was to compare long-term outcomes in terms of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events of 2 different complete coronary revascularization strategies in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease: 1-stage percutaneous coronary intervention (1S-PCI) during the index procedure versus multistage percutaneous coronary intervention (MS-PCI) complete coronary revascularization during the index hospitalization. Methods: In the SMILE (Impact of Different Treatment in Multivessel Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: One Stage Versus Multistaged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial, 584 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 manner to 1S-PCI or MS-PCI. The primary study endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, which were defined as cardiac death, death, reinfarction, rehospitalization for unstable angina, repeat coronary revascularization (target vessel revascularization), and stroke at 1 year. Results: The occurrence of the primary endpoint was significantly lower in the 1-stage group (1S-PCI: n = 36 [13.63%] vs. MS-PCI: n = 61 [23.19%]; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.549 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.363 to 0.828]; p = 0.004). The 1-year rate of target vessel revascularization was significantly higher in the MS-PCI group (1S-PCI: n = 22 [8.33%] vs. MS-PCI: n = 40 [15.20%]; HR: 0.522 [95% CI: 0.310 to 0.878]; p = 0.01; p log-rank = 0.013). When the analyses were limited to cardiac death (1S-PCI: n = 9 [3.41%] vs. MS-PCI: n = 14 [5.32%]; HR: 0.624 [95% CI: 0.270 to 1.441]; p = 0.27) and myocardial infarction (1S-PCI: n = 7 [2.65%] vs. MS-PCI: n = 10 [3.80%]; HR: 0.678 [95% CI: 0.156 to 2.657]; p = 0.46), no significant differences were observed between groups. Conclusions: In multivessel non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients, complete 1-stage coronary revascularization is superior to multistage PCI in terms of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. (Impact of Different Treatment in Multivessel Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [NSTEMI