Improved Canine and Human Visceral Leishmaniasis Immunodiagnosis Using Combinations of Synthetic Peptides in Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

Visceral leishmaniasis is endemic in many areas of tropical and subtropical America where it constitutes a significant public health problem. It is usually diagnosed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) using crude Leishmania antigens, but a variety of other immunological methods may also be applied. Although these approaches are useful, historically their sensitivity and specificity have often been compromised by the use of complex mixtures of antigens. In this context, the use of combinations of purified, well-characterized antigens appears preferable and may yield better results. In the present study, combinations of peptides derived from the previously described Leishmania diagnostic antigens A2, NH, LACK and K39 were used in ELISA against sera from 106 dogs and 44 human patients. Improved sensitivities and specificities, close to 100%, for both sera of patients and dogs was observed for ELISA using some combinations of the peptides, including the detection of VL in dogs with low anti-Leishmania antibody titers and asymptomatic infection. So, the use of combinations of B cell predicted synthetic peptides derived from antigens A2, NH, LACK and K39 may provide an alternative for improved sensitivities and specificities for immunodiagnostic assays of VL

Eficácia do emprego do espelho de Glatzel na avaliação da permeabilidade nasal Efficacy of the use of the Glatzel mirror in nasal permeability evaluation

OBJETIVO: Comparar a medida do escape aéreo nasal, realizada por meio espelho de Glatzel, entre crianças com e sem obstrução de via aérea superior, de acordo com o sexo e a faixa etária. MÉTODOS: Amostra composta por 43 crianças, com média de 6,9 anos, separadas em quatro grupos: com indicação cirúrgica para desobstrução de via aérea superior (grupo cirúrgico), alérgicos com manifestação de obstrução (grupo alérgico), alérgicos com obstrução e indicação de cirurgia (grupo alérgico e cirúrgico) e crianças sem obstrução (grupo controle). A medida do escape foi realizada por meio do Espelho Nasal Milimetrado de Altmann e os dados mensurados em cm² pelo software AutoCAD 2002. Os dados foram analisados por meio de estatística descritiva e por testes de hipótese com nível de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: O grupo controle foi o que apresentou a maior média (6,53 cm²) na medida do escape aéreo nasal, enquanto o grupo alérgico e cirúrgico apresentou a menor (3,07 cm²). As médias dos grupos alérgico e cirúrgico foram de 4,74 cm² e 5,91 cm², respectivamente. Apenas o grupo alérgico e cirúrgico apresentou diferença significante em relação ao grupo controles. Verificou-se ainda que a medida de escape não foi estatisticamente afetada pelas variáveis sexo e idade. CONCLUSÃO: O espelho de Glatzel demonstrou não ser um instrumento confiável para a avaliação da permeabilidade nasal na amostra investigada, exceto nos casos de grande obstrução nasal, ou seja, pacientes cirúrgicos e também alérgicos. Não foram observadas correlações com as variáveis: sexo e faixa etária.<br>PURPOSE: To compare the measurement of nasal air escape, carried out using the Glatzel mirror, in children with and without upper respiratory tract obstruction, according to sex and age. METHODS: The sample comprised 43 subjects, with mean age of 6.9 years, divided into four groups: children with surgical indication to clearing of the upper respiratory tract (surgical group), allergic children with upper respiratory tract obstruction (allergic group), allergic children with obstruction and surgical indication (surgical and allergic group), and children without obstruction (control group). Nasal air escape measurement was carried out using the Altmann's Millimetered Nasal Mirror, and data was measured in cm² by the AutoCAD 2002 software. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and hypotheses testing, with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The control group presented the highest mean (6.53 cm²) of nasal air escape, while surgical and allergic group presented the lowest mean (3.07 cm²). The means of the allergic group and the surgical group were 4.74 cm² and 5.91 cm², respectively. Only the surgical and allergic group presented statistically significant difference compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The Glatzel mirror demonstrated not to be a trustworthy instrument for the evaluation of nasal permeability in the analyzed sample, except in cases of severe nasal obstruction, that is, allergic patients with surgical indication. No correlations were found with the variables sex and age