48 research outputs found

    Comparison of the average RMSDs (per residue) in the (a) target mRNA and (b) guide DNA from the starting native structures of the wild-type and 4 mutants in the 11-bp nucleic acid heteroduplex.

    No full text
    <p>The results are obtained from 1 atm, 310 K NPT simulations (100āˆ¼120 ns). The X-axis indicates nucleotide position from the 5ā€² end of the guide DNA.</p

    Time evolution of the wild-type backbone RMSDs and the mismatch mutants from their respective initial ā€œnativeā€ structures using longer 15-bp nucleic acid heteroduplex system.

    No full text
    <p>The results are obtained from 1 atm, 310 K NPT simulations for 100āˆ¼120 ns. (<b>a</b>). The RMSDs of the DNA-mRNA heteroduplex in Ago complexes (<b>b</b>). The RMSDs of Ago protein in Ago complexes.</p

    The dynamic distance of base pairs for the wild-type and 4 mutants in the 11-bp nucleic acid heteroduplex.

    No full text
    <p>Distances are calculated from the C4ā€²ā€“C4ā€² atoms between the guide DNA strand and the target mRNA strand at the same position. <b>(a)</b>. Distance of the A/T base pair at position 6 <b>(b)</b>. Distance of the U/A base pair at position 7.</p

    Time evolution of the backbone RMSDs of wild-type and mismatch mutants from their respective initial ā€œnativeā€ structures using the 11-bp nucleic acid heteroduplex system.

    No full text
    <p>The results are obtained from 1 atm, 310 K NPT simulations (100āˆ¼120 ns). (<b>a</b>). RMSDs of the DNA-mRNA heteroduplex in Ago complexes (<b>b</b>). RMSDs of Ago protein in Ago complexes.</p

    A closer view of the ā€œhinge-likeā€ bending at L1/L2 segment by superposing the final conformation and the starting native structure of the 4-site mutant with 11-bp guide DNA-target RNA duplex.

    No full text
    <p>The nucleic acid and L1/L2 segment in the wild-type are colored orange and green, respectively. The nucleic acid in the 4-site mutant is colored yellow and the L1/L2 segment is colored cyan. The residues that form hydrogen bonds between the guide-target duplex and L1/L2 segment are shown as sticks.</p

    Polarizable Multipole-Based Force Field for Aromatic Molecules and Nucleobases

    No full text
    Aromatic molecules with Ļ€ electrons are commonly involved in chemical and biological recognitions. For example, nucleobases play central roles in DNA/RNA structure and their interactions with proteins. The delocalization of the Ļ€ electrons is responsible for the high polarizability of aromatic molecules. In this work, the AMOEBA force field has been developed and applied to 5 regular nucleobases and 12 aromatic molecules. The permanent electrostatic energy is expressed as atomic multipole interactions between atom pairs, and many-body polarization is accounted for by mutually induced atomic dipoles. We have systematically investigated aromatic ring stacking and aromatic-water interactions for nucleobases and aromatic molecules, as well as baseā€“base hydrogen-bonding pair interactions, all at various distances and orientations. van der Waals parameters were determined by comparison to the quantum mechanical interaction energy of these dimers and fine-tuned using condensed phase simulation. By comparing to quantum mechanical calculations, we show that the resulting classical potential is able to accurately describe molecular polarizability, molecular vibrational frequency, and dimer interaction energy of these aromatic systems. Condensed phase properties, including hydration free energy, liquid density, and heat of vaporization, are also in good overall agreement with experimental values. The structures of benzene liquid phase and benzene-water solution were also investigated by simulation and compared with experimental and PDB structure derived statistical results

    The dynamic distance of base pairs for the wild-type and 4 mutants in the longer 15-bp nucleic acid heteroduplex.

    No full text
    <p>Distances are calculated from the C4ā€²ā€“C4ā€² atoms between the guide DNA strand and the target mRNA strand at the same position. <b>(a)</b>. Distance of the A/T base pair at position 6 <b>(b)</b>. Distance of the U/A base pair at position 7.</p

    Structural comparison and distortion.

    No full text
    <p>Superposition of the final snapshot (colored in blue for the wild-type in the left panel and red for the 4-position mismatch mutant on the right) and the starting native structure (colored in light grey) for both the wild-type and the 4-site mismatch mutant of the 11-bp guide DNA/mRNA heteroduplex after 100+ ns of MD simulation. The backbone is represented as a tube and the rest are shown as plates. The numbers with prime (ā€²) indicate that the nucleic acid belongs to the target strand. Larger distortion in the seed region (position 2 to 8) can be seen clearly on the 4-site mismatch mutant.</p

    Structural view of the domain motions in the 4-site mutant Ago complexes with DNA as the guide strand.

    No full text
    <p>Two structures (one colored light grey and the other colored green) are picked from one 100-ns trajectory by principal component analysis and domain motion analysis. The 1<sup>st</sup> principal component <b>(a)</b> and the 2<sup>nd</sup> principal component <b>(b)</b> are shown here. The Ago protein is represented as cartoon and the four domain names are labeled. The red arrow here indicates the orientation of the domain motions.</p
    corecore