Properties of a dehydroalanine analog of glutathione: A reactive electrophilic busulfan metabolite

Gamma-Glutamyldehydroalanylglycine (EdAG) is a dethiolated, electrophilic metabolite of glutathione (GSH) derived from the Phase II conjugation of GSH with busulfan catalyzed by glutathione S-transferase (GST). It was demonstrated in this dissertation that EdAG could be successfully synthesized and shown to be a metabolite of busulfan from in vitro metabolism by enzymes in human liver cytosol. The electrophilic EdAG was reactive toward the cellular thiols cysteine and glutathione (GSH), and toward cysteine residues in reduced bovine insulin B-chain and bovine serum albumin in vitro , as well. EdAG was demonstrated to be a reversible noncompetitive inhibitor of GSTs, specifically GSTA1-1 at micromolar concentrations up to 1 mM. EdAG at high concentration (10 mM) was found to be an irreversible inhibitor of human GSTA1-1, although an EdAG-modified peptide was not observed. Inhibition of GST by a busulfan metabolite has the potential of altering busulfan pharmacokinetics or GSH cellular function. Since conversion of GSH to EdAG represents a loss of thiol-related redox properties and the gain of a captodative radical scavenging dehydroalanine group, the reactivity of EdAG with hydroxyl radical was evaluated. EdAG was shown to scavenge hydroxyl radical generated in the Fenton reaction in a concentration-dependent manner. The results indicate a stabilized carbon-based captodative radical intermediate in the reaction of EdAG with hydroxyl radical. In support of a captodative mechanism was the identification of a dimerized gamma-glutamylserylglycine as a product in the reaction. Conversion of GSH from a redox active nucleophile to an electrophilic dehydroalanine is a significant change in chemical reactivity that may have biological implications for GSH and free radical biochemistry as well as busulfan therapeutics

Anticancer Properties of a Novel Class of Tetrafluorinated Thalidomide Analogues

The authors thank Scott McMenemy for carrying out preliminary, early studies looking at effects of Gu compounds upon chicken embryology, as well as Charles D. Crowe, Jeffrey E. Roth, and Adam C. Rolt for critical comments on the article. fli1:EGFP zebrafish were obtained from the Zebrafish International Research Center (27). mpo:GFP zebrafish [also termed Tg(MPO:GFP)114] zebrafish were obtained from Dr. Stephen Renshaw, University of Sheffield (Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK; ref. 29).Peer reviewedPostprin

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the dual TORC1/2 inhibitor sapanisertib in combination with the MEK inhibitor trametinib in dogs

Activation of one or both the Ras/MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signal transduction pathways are known to mediate oncogenicity of several canine and human cancers, including mucosal melanomas. Reciprocal cross activation between the two pathways can be a source of drug resistance. Consequently, oral dosing for plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis and tolerability to a combination of sapanisertib, a dual TORC1/2 inhibitor, and trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, was evaluated in nontumor-bearing laboratory dogs for its potential application in parallel pathway targeting. Twelve dogs, divided into three equal cohorts, received either the combination or single agents. Animals were monitored for PK following single dose and 17-day repeat dosing, and by clinical observations, hematology, serum biochemistry, coagulation studies and urinalyses. A single trametinib dose (0.025 mg/kg), sulfated as dimethyl sulfoxide which enhanced its absorption, reached mean maximum concentration (Cmax) 0.64 ng/mL [18% coefficient of variation (CV)] at a median time to maximum concentration (Tmax) of 1.5 h (hr), and mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 16.8 hr*ng/mL (14%CV), which were similar when given alone or in combination with sapanisertib. A prolonged half-life afforded 3–4-fold plasma accumulation of trametinib with daily dosing, analogous to humans. Trametinib PK mirrored previous regulatory data in dogs, while exposure approximated some published human values but generally not all patients. Sapanisertib-alone in canine plasma following single 0.1 mg/kg dose [mean Cmax 26.3 ng/mL (21%CV), median Tmax 2.0 hr, and mean AUC 248 hr*ng/mL (41%CV)] resembled levels in human therapeutic trials; whereas canine sapanisertib exposure was reduced when combined with trametinib, a known cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 inducer. Sex differences were not observed for either drug. Side effects upon repeat dosing with either or both drugs may include body weight loss, maldigestion, and cutaneous discoloration. The combination was tolerated without dose limiting toxicity, although clinical laboratory analyses revealed drug-induced acute-phase inflammation, proteinuria, and decreased blood reticulocytes, mild changes not necessitating intervention. Short-term results in dogs with this combination would appear to hold translational promise for clinical trial evaluation to target canine and possibly human melanoma, as well as other cancers having one or both signal transduction pathway activations

A phase I/II study of pemetrexed with sirolimus in advanced, previously treated non-small cell lung cancer

Background: Single-agent pemetrexed is a treatment for recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that provides limited benefit. Preclinical studies showed promising synergistic effects when the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor sirolimus was added to pemetrexed. Methods: This was a single-institution phase I/II study of pemetrexed in combination with sirolimus. The primary endpoint for the phase I was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety of the combination. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion was to determine the overall response rate at the MTD. Key eligibility criteria included recurrent, metastatic NSCLC, ECOG performance status of 0–2, and adequate organ function. Sirolimus was administered orally daily after an initial loading dose, and pemetrexed was given intravenously on day 1 of every 21-day cycle. Results: Forty-two patients with recurrent, metastatic NSCLC were enrolled, 22 in phase I and 20 in phase II. The MTD was pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, and sirolimus 10 mg on day 1, and 3 mg daily thereafter. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 38 (90.5%) patients. The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs were lymphopenia (31%) and hypophosphatemia (19%). Two treatment-related deaths occurred due to febrile neutropenia and infection, respectively. Among 27 total patients treated at the MTD, 6 (22.2%) had a partial response (PR), 12 (44.4%) had stable disease (SD) and 5 (18.5%) had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.4 weeks (95% CI: 7.0–29.4). Conclusions: The combination of pemetrexed and sirolimus is active in heavily-pretreated NSCLC (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00923273)