Vedolizumab is superior to infliximab in biologic naïve patients with ulcerative colitis

Abstract There are no prospective, head-to-head, controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of Infliximab (IFX) and Vedolizumab (VDZ) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), while only a few real-life retrospective studies have been published so far. We assessed the efficacy of IFX vs. VDZ in two cohorts of biologic-naïve outpatients with moderate-to-severe UC or mild, but refractory, disease. Data were extracted from patients’ files and reviewed. The duration of follow-up (FU) was 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the clinical remission (CR) at the end of FU. Secondary endpoints were: drug persistency, time to obtain CR, clinical response at the end of the induction phase (IP), steroid-free CR (compared to patients who used steroids at baseline) at the end of FU, need for drug optimization, adverse events (AEs), and normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP). We also analyzed the causes of dropping out (primary non-response), or secondary loss of response (immunogenic or not), for each group. We enrolled 82 patients (50 IFX and 32 VDZ) who met the inclusion criteria. At the end of FU, CR was obtained in 32% of the patients on IFX and 75% on VDZ (p = 0.0003). Drug persistency was superior for VDZ compared to IFX (78% vs. 52%, p = 0.033). Clinical response at the end of induction was reached in 54% and in 81% in the IFX and VDZ group, respectively (p = 0.014). Steroid-free clinical remission at the end of FU was 62% and 94% in the IFX vs. VDZ group, respectively (p = 0.036). The need for drug optimization was higher for VDZ than for IFX (28% vs. 57%, p = 0.009), while the time to obtain CR, the incidence of AEs, mean duration of FU, and rate of CRP normalization at the end of IP were comparable between the two groups. There was a prevalence of patients dropping out because of primary non-response in IFX group (p = 0.027), while the incidence of secondary loss of response was similar in the two groups. At the multivariate analysis, CRP and Partial Mayo Score (PMS) at T0 did not correlate with CR at the end of FU in both groups. In this retrospective, real world data study in biologic-naïve patients, VDZ was superior to IFX in CR, clinical response rate at the end of IP, drug persistency, steroid-free remission, and need for optimization at the end of FU

Low-dose maintenance therapy with infliximab prevents postsurgical recurrence of Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Infliximab might prevent postsurgical recurrence of Crohn\u2019s disease. However, it is unclear whether long-term therapy is necessary and whether alternative strategies could be applied to minimize potential side effects and reduce the costs of treatment. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in 12 consecutive patients, treated immediately after surgery with maintenance infliximab (5 mg/kg), who did not have clinical or endoscopic evidence of disease recurrence after 24 months; they were followed up for an additional year. Infliximab treatment was then discontinued; patients with disease recurrence, based on endoscopy (Rutgeerts score, 2), were given lower doses of infliximab (starting with 1 mg/kg) to re-establish mucosal integrity. Surrogate markers of disease activity (fecal calprotectin [FC], C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) were assessed after each infliximab dose. RESULTS: None of the patients had clinical or endoscopic recurrence of Crohn\u2019s disease 3 years after surgery. However, discontinuation of infliximab caused endoscopic recurrence after 4 months in 10 of 12 patients (83%). All 10 patients then were treated again with infliximab, which, at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks, restored and maintained mucosal integrity for 1 year. Among the surrogate markers, FC levels correlated with endoscopic scores (Wald test, P .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term maintenance therapy with infliximab is required to maintain mucosal integrity in patients after surgery for Crohn\u2019s disease. However, a dose of 3 mg/kg (a 40% reduction from the standard dose) was sufficient to avoid disease recurrence, determined by endoscopy, in all patients at 1 year. FC levels correlate with mucosal status at different infliximab doses

Early diagnosis and treatment of postoperative endoscopic recurrence of Crohn's disease: partial benefit by infiximab - A pilot study

Goals: Primary outcome of this study was to clarify whether infliximab, given after diagnosis of post operative endoscopic recurrence of Crohn\u2019s diseases, can heal mucosal lesions (score <2) at 54 weeks. The secondary outcomes were improvement in the endoscopic score and clinical recurrence at 54 weeks. Background: Current data indicate that infliximab - given immediately after surgery \u2013 may be very effective in preventing postsurgical recurrence of Crohn\u2019s disease. However, it is unknown whether a similar benefit would result from early diagnosis and treatment, rather then prevention, of endoscopic recurrence. Study: In this prospective open label multicenter pilot study 43 patients with ileocolonic Crohn\u2019s disease subjected to curative surgery underwent colonoscopy 6 months after surgery. Patients with endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts score 65 2) were treated with either mesalamine 800 mg tid or infliximab 5 mg/Kg bw on a maintenance basis. Colonoscopy was performed after 54 weeks of therapy. Results: A total of 24/43 patients were diagnosed with endoscopic recurrence at 6 months. Thirteen were treated with infliximab and eleven with mesalamine. None of the 11 mesalamine treated patients had mucosal healing at 54 weeks. Two had clinical recurrence at 8 and 9 months. Fifty-four percent of patients treated with infliximab had mucosal healing at 54 weeks (p=0.01) while 69% had an improvement in the endoscopic score. None had clinical recurrence. Conclusions: Treatment of postsurgical endoscopic lesions by infliximab appears superior to mesalamine. However a sizeable proportion of patients did not fully benefit from this strategy

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms (PAC-SYM) among patients with chronic constipation

Background and aim: PAC-SYM is widely adopted to asses constipation severity. However, it has been validated in a small sample, few items have been included based on expert opinion and not on empirical grounds, and its factor structure has never been replicated. We aimed at evaluating the psychometric properties of PAC-SYM in patients with chronic constipation. Methods: We enrolled 2,203 outpatients with chronic constipation in two waves. We used wave I sample to test the psychometric properties of the PAC-SYM and wave II sample to cross-validate its factor structure, to assess criterion validity, responsiveness to clinical change, and its minimal clinically important difference. Results: Only a minority of patients reported any rectal tearing (38 %). Deletion of such item leads to a 11-item version (M:PAC-SYM). The remaining items in the rectal domain were moderately correlated with the stool domain. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis revealed a bifactor structure with two subscales (stool and abdominal symptoms) and a general severity factor. The M:PAC-SYM demonstrated excellent reliability, moderate correlation with SF-12 and treatment satisfaction (r = 0.28-0.45), discrimination across Rome III criteria for functional constipation and abdominal pain, and responsiveness to clinical change (β = -0.49; ω2 = 0.25). M:PAC-SYM minimal clinically important difference was 0.24. Conclusion: Our analysis shows that the rectal domain may not represent a relevant cluster of symptoms for patients with chronic constipation. We developed a modified version of the PAC-SYM which might better represent symptom severity of most patients seeking care in gastroenterology referral centers

Bloating is associated with worse quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and treatment responsiveness among patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation

Background: The management of bloating is unclear and its relationship with patients' well-being and treatment satisfaction independent of other abdominal symptoms is uncharacterized. We evaluated the association of bloating with patient-reported outcomes. Methods: Thirty-nine centers for functional gastrointestinal disorders joined the laxative inadequate relief survey. We enrolled 2203 consecutive outpatients with functional constipation (FC) or constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) in two cross-sectional waves. Both wave 1 and 2 included the SF-12, the patient assessment of constipation-symptoms (PAC-SYM), and the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM-2). Wave 2 only included a global rating of change (GRC) scale to assess patients' assessment of efficacy concerning treatment switches occurred in the 3 months prior to the interview. Bloating in the abdomen was defined on the basis of PAC-SYM item 3. Key Results: The average age was 50.1 years (SD, 16.7) and 82.1% of patients were women. The prevalence of bloating was 91.6% (n = 1970). Bloating was associated with SF-12 Physical Composite Score (p < 0.01), SF-12 Mental Composite Score (p < 0.01), GRC (p < 0.01), Satisfaction with treatment effectiveness (p < 0.01), convenience of administration (p < 0.01), and side effects (p < 0.01) after adjustment for possible confounders. Conclusions & Inferences: Our data suggest that patients regard bloating as a key element in assessing clinical changes and treatments' efficacy as this symptom exerts a strong influence on patient-reported outcomes independent of possible confounders and other symptoms of constipation. Our data provide the rationale to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of new treatments specifically addressing this important, yet disregarded, patients' complain