13 research outputs found
Mechanical Regulation of Wnt/β-catenin Signaling in Bone Cells
poster abstractThe Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is an important regulatory pathway in development and maintenance of various tissues, including bone. Active Wnt interacts with the frizzled/LRP receptor activating dishevelled, which in turn inactivates the GSK-3β complex and allows βcatenin to accumulate in the cytoplasm. β-catenin translocates to the nucleus where it activates a wide number of developmental target genes. Wnt can be sequestered by soluble frizzled related protein causing the inactivation of dishevelled, allowing for activation of the GSK-3β complex. This activated complex binds β-catenin and targets it for degradation. In addition to its other major role as a linker between cadherins and the actin cytoskeleton, β-catenin accumulation in the cytoplasm and subsequent translocation to the nucleus is a key step in the wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. In bone, wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates skeletal formation, limb development and osteoblast maturation. Both active and inactive wnt/β-catenin signaling regulate bone cell development, active wnt/β-catenin signaling promotes osteoblast formation, while inactive wnt/β-catenin signaling inhibits osteoclast differentiation. Mechanical regulation of bone cells occurs through a process known as mechanotransduction which can be induced by fluid shear stress that occurs across the surfaces of osteoblasts and osteocytes, the effector cells of mechanotransduction. We hypothesize that knocking down β-catenin expression in mouse osteoblasts and osteoprogenitors will change the way these cells respond to fluid shear stress and regulate expression of relevant bone target genes. The future aims of this project are to assess the role of β-catenin during fluid shear stress induced osteoprogenitor cell differentiation by examining the expression of important osteoblast differentiation markers including: runx2, COX2, osteopontin, and osteocalcin and evaluate the significance of β-catenin during differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells
The cytoplasmic domain of L-selectin interacts with cytoskeletal proteins via α-actinin: Receptor positioning in microvilli does not require interaction with α-actinin
The leukocyte adhesion molecule L-selectin mediates binding to lymph node high endothelial venules (HEV) and contributes to leukocyte rolling on endothelium at sites of inflammation. Previously, it was shown that truncation of the L-selectin cytoplasmic tail by 11 amino acids abolished binding to lymph node HEV and leukocyte rolling in vivo, but the molecular basis for that observation was not determined. This study examined potential interactions between L-selectin and cytoskeletal proteins. We found that the cytoplasmic domain of L-selectin interacts directly with the cytoplasmic actin-binding protein α-actinin and forms a complex with vinculin and possibly talin. Solid phase binding assays using the full-length L-selectin cytoplasmic domain bound to microtiter wells demonstrated direct, specific, and saturable binding of purified α-actinin to L-selectin (K(d) = 550 nM), but no direct binding of purified talin or vinculin. Interestingly, talin potentiated binding of α-actinin to the L-selectin cytoplasmic domain peptide despite the fact that direct binding of talin to L-selectin could not be measured. Vinculin binding to the L-selectin cytoplasmic domain peptide was detectable only in the presence of α-actinin. L-selectin coprecipitated with a complex of cytoskeletal proteins including α-actinin and vinculin from cells transfected with L-selectin, consistent with the possibility that α-actinin binds directly to L-selectin and that vinculin associates by binding to α-actinin in vivo to link actin filaments to the L-selectin cytoplasmic domain. In contrast, a deletion mutant of L-selectin lacking the COOH-terminal 11 amino acids of the cytoplasmic domain failed to coprecipitate with α-actinin or vinculin. Surprisingly, this mutant L- selectin localized normally to the microvillar projections on the cell surface. These data suggest that the COOH-terminal 11 amino acids of the L- selectin cytoplasmic domain are required for mediating interactions with the actin cytoskeleton via a complex of α-actinin and vinculin, but that this portion of the cytoplasmic domain is not necessary for proper localization of L-selectin on the cell surface. Correct L-selectin receptor positioning is therefore insufficient for leukocyte adhesion mediated by L-selectin, suggesting that this adhesion may also require direct interactions with the cytoskeleton
The Interplay Between Cell Adhesion Cues and Curvature of Cell Adherent Alginate Microgels in Multipotent Stem Cell Culture
Differential Effects of Hydroxamate Inhibitors on PMA- and Ligand-Induced L-Selectin Down-Modulation: Role of Membrane Proximal and Cytoplasmic Domains
Lipopolysaccharide enhances FcγR-dependent functions in vivo through CD11b/CD18 up-regulation
Fc receptors for immunoglobulin G (IgG) (FcγR) mediate several defence mechanisms in the course of inflammatory and infectious diseases. In Gram-negative infections, cellular wall lipopolysaccharides (LPS) modulate different immune responses. We have recently demonstrated that murine LPS in vivo treatment significantly increases FcγR-dependent clearance of immune complexes (IC). In addition, we and others have reported the induction of adhesion molecules on macrophages and neutrophils by LPS in vivo and by tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in vitro. The aim of this paper was to investigate CD11b/CD18 participation in LPS enhancing effects on Fcγ-dependent functionality of tissue macrophages. Our results have demonstrated that LPS can enhance antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and IC-triggered cytotoxicity (IC-Ctx), two reactions which involve the Fcγ-receptor but different lytic mechanisms. In vitro incubation of splenocytes from LPS-treated mice with anti-CD11b/CD18 abrogated ADCC and IC-Ctx enhancement, without affecting FcγR expression. Similar results were obtained with physiological concentrations of fibrinogen. In this way cytotoxic values of LPS-splenocytes decreased to the basal levels of control mice. Time and temperature requirements for such inhibition strongly suggested that anti-CD11b/CD18 could modulate intracellular signals leading to downregulation of FcγR functionality. Data presented herein support the hypothesis that functional and/or physical associations between integrins and FcγR could be critical for the modulation of effector functions during an inflammatory response
Magnetic Levitation of MC3T3 Osteoblast Cells as a Ground-Based Simulation of Microgravity
Dual Regulation of Actin Rearrangement through Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor in Neuroblast Cell Lines: Actin Depolymerization by Ca(2+)-α-Actinin and Polymerization by Rho
Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a potent lipid mediator with actions on many cell types. Morphological changes involving actin polymerization are mediated by at least two cognate G protein-coupled receptors, LPA(1)/EDG-2 or LPA(2)/EDG-4. Herein, we show that LPA can also induce actin depolymerization preceding actin polymerization within single TR mouse immortalized neuroblasts. Actin depolymerization resulted in immediate loss of membrane ruffling, whereas actin polymerization resulted in process retraction. Each pathway was found to be independent: depolymerization mediated by intracellular calcium mobilization, and α-actinin activity and polymerization mediated by the activation of the small Rho GTPase. α-Actinin–mediated depolymerization seems to be involved in growth cone collapse of primary neurons, indicating a physiological significance of LPA-induced actin depolymerization. Further evidence for dual regulation of actin rearrangement was found by heterologous retroviral transduction of either lpa(1) or lpa(2) in B103 cells that neither express LPA receptors nor respond to LPA, to confer both forms of LPA-induced actin rearrangements. These results suggest that diverging intracellular signals from a single type of LPA receptor could regulate actin depolymerization, as well as polymerization, within a single cell. This dual actin rearrangement may play a novel, important role in regulation of the neuronal morphology and motility during brain development