10 research outputs found

    The percent of biological process variation in ocelot abundance explained by four reserve variables among six Atlantic Forest reserves in southeastern Brazil.

    No full text
    <p>Negative process variances were considered zero. See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141333#sec002" target="_blank">Methods</a> for details.</p

    Atlantic Forest reserves sampled for ocelot populations in State of Minas Gerais (MG), southeastern Brazil.

    No full text
    <p>FM = Fazenda Macedônia Reserve; FMA = Feliciano Miguel Abdala Reserve; MS = Mata do Sossego Reserve; SB = Serra do Brigadeiro State Park; SS = Sete Salões State Park; RD = Rio Doce State Park. The current distribution of Atlantic Forest remnants are shown in the insert (grey area) as defined by the SOS Mata Atlântica Foundation [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141333#pone.0141333.ref047" target="_blank">47</a>]. The state divisions are from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141333#pone.0141333.ref048" target="_blank">48</a>].</p

    Abundance and density estimates for ocelots derived from camera-trap studies conducted in Atlantic forest sites.

    No full text
    <p><sup>1</sup> [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141333#pone.0141333.ref030" target="_blank">30</a>]</p><p><sup>2</sup> [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141333#pone.0141333.ref031" target="_blank">31</a>]</p><p><sup>3</sup> [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141333#pone.0141333.ref032" target="_blank">32</a>]</p><p><sup>4</sup> [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141333#pone.0141333.ref033" target="_blank">33</a>]</p><p><sup>5</sup> [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0141333#pone.0141333.ref029" target="_blank">29</a>]</p><p>Estimates are provided for two levels of buffers (MMDM, ½MMDM) according to their availability in each study. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (95% CI) are presented, unless not included in a study.</p

    Area covered by camera traps (minimum convex polygon—MCP—area), buffer area and effective trapping areas (ETA) based on two distances (MMDM = 2,718.61 m and ½ MMDM = 1,359.31 m) derived from camera traps in six Atlantic Forest reserves in southeastern Brazil.

    No full text
    <p>Area covered by camera traps (minimum convex polygon—MCP—area), buffer area and effective trapping areas (ETA) based on two distances (MMDM = 2,718.61 m and ½ MMDM = 1,359.31 m) derived from camera traps in six Atlantic Forest reserves in southeastern Brazil.</p

    Model-averaged estimates of ocelot detection probabilities (<i>p</i>; ± 95% CI) in six Atlantic Forest reserves, southeastern Brazil.

    No full text
    <p>FM = Fazenda Macedônia Reserve; FMA = Feliciano Miguel Abdala Reserve; MS = Mata do Sossego Reserve; SB = Serra do Brigadeiro State Park; SS = Sete Salões State Park; RD = Rio Doce State Park.</p
    corecore