Clinical benefits of low serum digoxin concentrations in heart failure

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether there was a relationship between serum digoxin concentration (SDC), including SDCs typically regarded as low, and clinical efficacy related to digoxin in patients with symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. BACKGROUND: Digitalis glycosides have been used for 200 years in the treatment of heart failure (HF), but the SDC required for optimal clinical efficacy and acceptable toxicity remains controversial. METHODS: This relationship was investigated by utilizing data from two randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, digoxin-withdrawal trials: the Prospective Randomized study Of Ventricular failure and Efficacy of Digoxin (PROVED) and the Randomized Assessment of Digoxin on Inhibitors of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (RADIANCE). Major end points were worsening HF, change in left ventricular ejection fraction and treadmill time after randomization. The primary analysis investigated the relationship between SDC at randomization and these end points. A secondary categorical analysis compared these end points in patients who discontinued digoxin versus patients who continued digoxin and had low (0.5 to 0.9 ng/ml), moderate (0.9 to 1.2 ng/ml) or high (>1.2 ng/ml) SDCs at randomization. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis failed to find a relationship between randomization SDC, considered as a continuous variable, and any study end point (all p > 0.236). Multivariable Cox analysis found that the risk of worsening HF was significantly less (all p < 0.02) for patients in any category of SDC who continued digoxin, as compared with patients withdrawn from digoxin. Specifically, patients in the low SDC category were significantly less likely than placebo patients to experience worsening HF during follow-up (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The beneficial effects of digoxin on common clinical end points in patients with HF were similar, regardless of SDC

Influence of calcium administration on the short-term hemodynamic and anti-ischemic effects of nifedipine

This prospective study investigated whether pretreatment with intravenously administered calcium would influence the effect of nifedipine on rest hemodynamics and treadmill performance in patients with ischemic heart disease. Seventeen patients were studied after undergoing a qualifying treadmill exercise test that revealed ST segment depression indicative of ischemic heart disease. Study subjects performed three additional treadmill tests as part of the protocol. One treadmill test was obtained from each patient to provide baseline measurements without a preceding intravenous infusion and in the absence of all antianginal drugs including nifedipine two additional exercise tests were preceded by an infusion and 10 mg of bite-and-swallow nifedipine. The infusions, administered in a randomized, double-blind, crossover fashion, consisted of either 10 ml of 10% calcium chloride (13.6 mEq) in 50 ml of 5% dextrose in water or 5% dextrose in water alone. Rest systolic blood pressure (134 +/- 4.6 mm Hg) was unchanged after placebo infusion (135 +/- 4.6 mm Hg) but decreased to 124 +/- 4.1 mm Hg (p less than 0.01) 25 min after nifedipine administration. Rest systolic blood pressure increased after calcium infusion (from 139 +/- 4.3 to 148 +/- 4.8 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) and then decreased significantly 25 min after nifedipine administration to 135 +/- 4.2 mm Hg (p less than 0.01). Despite a decrease at the time of peak nifedipine effect after either infusion, systolic blood pressure was significantly lower after administration of nifedipine alone than after administration of calcium and nifedipine (124 +/- 4.1 vs. 135 +/- 4.2 mm Hg, p less than 0.01)