17 research outputs found

    Baseline fragmented QRS increases the risk of major arrhythmic events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144613/1/anec12533.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/144613/2/anec12533_am.pd

    Chronic kidney disease is associated with increased mortality and procedural complications in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Full text link
    ObjectiveWe performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to explore the association between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and mortality and procedural complications in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).BackgroundThe impact of varying stages of CKD or end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) on patients receiving TAVR is not clearly identified.MethodsWe searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to May 2018. Included studies were published TAVR studies that compared the risk of mortality and procedural complications in CKD patients compared to control patients. Data from each study were combined using the random‐effects model.ResultsTwelve studies (42,703 CKD patients and 51,347 controls) were included. Compared with controls, CKD patients had a significantly higher risk of 30‐day overall mortality (risk ratio [RR] = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34–1.80, I2 = 60.9), long‐term cardiovascular mortality (RR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.22–1.70, I2 = 36.2%), and long‐term overall mortality (RR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.45–1.91, I2 = 80.3), as well as procedural complications including pacemaker requirement (RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.03–1.39, I2 = 56.1%) and bleeding (RR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.26–2.02, I2 = 86.0%). Risk of mortality and procedural complications increased with severity of CKD for stages 3, 4, and 5, respectively, in terms of long‐term overall mortality (RR = 1.28, 1.82, and 2.12), 30‐day overall mortality (RR = 1.26, 1.89, and 1.93), 30‐day cardiovascular mortality (RR = 1.18, 1.75, and 2.50), and 30‐day overall bleeding (RR = 1.19, 1.63, and 2.12).ConclusionsOur meta‐analysis demonstrates a significant increased risk of mortality and procedural complications in patients with CKD who underwent TAVR compared to controls.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151278/1/ccd28102_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151278/2/ccd28102.pd

    Significant association between osteoporosis and hearing loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    No full text
    Abstract Introduction: There is inconclusive evidence whether osteoporosis increases risk of hearing loss in current literature. Objective: We conducted this meta-analysis to determine whether there is an association between hearing loss and osteoporosis. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted from studies of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS. Osteoporosis was defined as having a bone mineral density with a T-score of less than −2.5 standard deviation. The outcome was hearing loss as assessed by audiometry or self-reported assessment. Random-effects model and pooled hazard ratio, risk ratio, or odds ratio of hearing loss with 95% confidence intervals were compared between normal bone mineral density and low bone mineral density or osteoporosis. Results: A total of 16 articles underwent full-length review. Overall, there was a statistically significant increased odds of hearing loss in the low bone mineral density or osteoporosis group with odds ratio of 1.20 (95% confidence intervals 1.01-1.42, p = 0.04, I 2 = 82%, Pheterogeneity = 0.01). However, the study from Helzner et al. reported significantly increase odds of hearing loss in the low bone mineral density in particular area and population included femoral neck of black men 1.37 (95% confidence intervals 1.07-1.76, p = 0.01) and total hip of black men 1.36 (95% confidence intervals 1.05-1.76, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Our study proposed the first meta-analysis that demonstrated a probable association between hearing loss and bone mineral density. Osteoporosis could be a risk factor in hearing loss and might play an important role in age-related hearing loss

    ASSOCIATION OF OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA WITH CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY AND CHOROIDAL THICKNESS A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    No full text
    Purpose: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been associated with an array of ocular disorders. This systematic review aims to investigate the association of OSA with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) and subfoveal choroidal thickness changes on enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of all articles published up to November 2017 examining rate of OSA in patients with CSCR versus controls or examining subfoveal choroidal thickness measurements on enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography in patients with OSA versus controls. Pooled odds ratios and weighted mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: For the CSCR/OSA analysis, 7,238 patients (1,479 with CSCR and 5,759 controls) from 6 studies were eligible. For the choroidal thickness/OSA analysis, 778 eyes of 778 patients (514 with OSA and 264 controls) from 9 studies were eligible. Patients with CSCR had a 1.56 increased odds of having OSA than controls (odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.16-2.10). There was no statistically significant difference in choroidal thickness between mild OSA subjects and controls (weighted mean difference = -3.17; 95% CI, -19.10 to 12.76). Patients with moderate OSA (weighted mean difference = -24.14; 95% CI, -42.16 to -6.12) and severe OSA (weighted mean difference = -51.19; 95% CI, -99.30 to -3.08) had thinner choroidal thickness measurements than controls. Conclusion: In summary, our results suggest that patients with CSCR are more likely to have OSA, and that moderate/severe OSA is associated with smaller subfoveal choroidal measurements on enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography

    ASSOCIATION OF RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION WITH CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS AND MORTALITY A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    No full text
    Purpose: Previous studies examining the association of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and cardiovascular events have been inconsistent and have mostly focused on stroke and myocardial infarction. The goal of this study is to use meta-analysis to examine the available evidence examining the association of RVO with incident cardiovascular events and mortality. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of all longitudinal cohort studies published in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to April 7, 2018, that evaluated the association of baseline RVO and incident cardiovascular events and/or mortality, that provided multivariate-adjusted risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and that had average follow-up >= 1 year. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess study quality. Multivariate-adjusted risk estimates with 95% CI along with study characteristics were extracted from each study, and pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CI were generated using a random-effects model with inverse-variance weighting to account for heterogeneity. Main outcomes were incident stroke (fatal or nonfatal), myocardial infarction, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. Results: Fifteen cohort studies with a total of 474,466 patients (60,069 with RVO and 414,397 without RVO) were included. Each study had Newcastle-Ottawa scale score >= 6, indicating moderate-to-high quality. Retinal vein occlusion was associated with increased risk of stroke (RR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.31-1.60), myocardial infarction (RR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.17-1.37), heart failure (RR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.22-1.92), peripheral arterial disease (RR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09-1.46), and all-cause mortality (RR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02-1.81), but was not associated with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR = 1.78; 95% CI, 0.70-4.48). Conclusion: This review suggests patients with RVO have an increased risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. More studies are needed to determine the highest risk periods for cardiovascular events and mortality after RVO and whether immediate cardiovascular evaluation and intervention will improve outcomes

    Baseline Prolonged PR Interval and Outcome of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    No full text
    Abstract Background: Recent studies suggest that baseline prolonged PR interval is associated with worse outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature have not been made. Objective: To assess the association between baseline prolonged PR interval and adverse outcomes of CRT by a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis. Methods: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to March 2017. The included studies were published prospective or retrospective cohort studies that compared all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, and composite outcome of CRT with baseline prolonged PR (> 200 msec) versus normal PR interval. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate the risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Six studies from January 1991 to May 2017 were included in this meta-analysis. All-cause mortality rate is available in four studies involving 17,432 normal PR and 4,278 prolonged PR. Heart failure hospitalization is available in two studies involving 16,152 normal PR and 3,031 prolonged PR. Composite outcome is available in four studies involving 17,001 normal PR and 3,866 prolonged PR. Prolonged PR interval was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (pooled risk ratio = 1.34, 95 % confidence interval: 1.08-1.67, p < 0.01, I2= 57.0%), heart failure hospitalization (pooled risk ratio = 1.30, 95 % confidence interval: 1.16-1.45, p < 0.01, I2= 6.6%) and composite outcome (pooled risk ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.30, p < 0.01, I2= 0%). Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis support the hypothesis that baseline prolonged PR interval is a predictor of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and composite outcome in CRT patients

    Type of syncope and outcome in Brugada syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

    No full text
    Abstract Introduction Brugada syndrome is an inherited arrhythmic disease associated with major arrhythmic events (MAE). The importance of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in Brugada syndrome is well recognized; however, ventricular arrhythmia risk stratification remains challenging and controversial. We aimed to assess the association of type of syncope with MAE via systematic review and meta‐analysis. Methods We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to December 2021. Included studies were cohort (prospective or retrospective) studies that reported the types of syncope (cardiac, unexplained, vasovagal, and undifferentiated) and MAE. Data from each study were combined using the random‐effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Seventeen studies from 2005 to 2019 were included in this meta‐analysis involving 4355 Brugada syndrome patients. Overall, syncope was significantly associated with an increased risk of MAE in Brugada syndrome (OR = 3.90, 95% CI: 2.22–6.85, p < .001, I2 = 76.0%). By syncope type, cardiac (OR = 4.48, 95% CI: 2.87–7.01, p < .001, I2 = 0.0%) and unexplained (OR = 4.71, 95% CI: 1.34–16.57, p = .016, I2 = 37.3%) syncope was significantly associated with increased risk of MAE in Brugada syndrome. Vasovagal (OR = 2.90, 95% CI: 0.09–98.45, p = .554, I2 = 70.9%) and undifferentiated syncope (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.00–4.03, p = .050, I2 = 64.6%, respectively) were not. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that cardiac and unexplained syncope was associated with MAE risk in Brugada syndrome populations but not in vasovagal syncope and undifferentiated syncope. Unexplained syncope is associated with a similar increased risk of MAE compared to cardiac syncope
    corecore