7 research outputs found

    Therapeutic management of chronic spontaneous urticaria in clinical practice: results from a pilot survey

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: The therapeutic approaches to patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) differ among health care professionals and may be influenced by many factors. OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional survey was aimed at evaluating physicians\u2019 attitudes regarding therapeutic management of CSU on clinical practice. METHODS: A study-specific questionnaire was administered to a group of physicians (n=21) with a specialist interest in CSU from different areas of Italy (Group A) and also to other physicians (n=25) who manage CSU only occasionally in their clinical activity (Group B). RESULTS: In case of ineffectiveness of second-generation antihistamines at standard doses, higher doses of the same drug were always or frequently prescribed by most physicians in both groups, and 64% in group B and one third in group A usually increased the dose up to twice. Old-generation antihistamines were never used in clinical practice by 14% of survey participants in group A and 24% in group B, with the remaining physicians reporting rare or occasional uses. The prescription of systemic corticosteroids appeared to be more common among physicians in group B. The question concerning the use of alternative drugs in refractory CSU produced different answers between the two groups. Costs and access to specialist reference centers were indicated as the most important barriers to the use of medications different from antihistamines. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that therapeutic approaches to CSU seem to be heterogeneous in clinical practice and could be at least in part conditioned by the different medical settings where physicians usually work

    Chronic spontaneous urticaria in clinical practice: a pilot survey about attitudes and perceptions on assessment, diagnostic work-up and dietary management

    No full text
    Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a heterogeneous condition whose management can be complex and challenging. The 0bjectives is to evaluate physicians' attitudes regarding practical aspects of CSU management, including adherence to international guidelines, criteria and instruments for CSU assessment, prescription of laboratory investigations and role of dietary measures. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a study-specific questionnaire. It was administered to a group of physicians with a specialist interest in CSU from different areas of Italy definable as "CSU experts" (Group A; n=21) and subsequently to other physicians who managed CSU only occasionally in their clinical activity (Group B; n=25). Results: The EAACI/GA\ub2LEN/EDF/WAO guidelines were considered very or moderately useful by the majority of participants. Significantly more physicians in group A reported that such guidelines were always followed in clinical practice (P=0.0008). Instruments for the assessment of CSU severity/activity and quality of life were used in clinical practice significantly more often by CSU experts as compared to group B. Dietary measures were frequently suggested for CSU patients by nearly three quarters of group B members and by only 5% of CSU experts (P<0.00001). When physicians were asked to indicate the type of laboratory examinations that were commonly performed in patients with longstanding and/or uncontrolled CSU, regardless of history, the investigations most frequently reported were full blood count and thyroid autoantibodies, followed by erythrosedimentation rate and/or C-reactive protein and thyroid function tests. Conclusions: The results of the present pilot survey seem to suggest the heterogeneity of the approaches used for CSU management in clinical practice
    corecore