143 research outputs found

    Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of the study was to evaluate systematic reviews of research into two public health priorities, tobacco consumption and HIV infection, in terms of the reporting of data related to the applicability of trial results (i.e., whether the results of a trial can be reasonably applied or generalized to a definable group of patients in a particular setting in routine practice, also called external validity or generalisability).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>All systematic reviews of interventions aimed at reducing or stopping tobacco use and treating or preventing HIV infection published in the Cochrane database of systematic reviews and in journals indexed in MEDLINE between January 1997 and December 2007 were selected. We used a standardized data abstraction form to extract data related to applicability in terms of the context of the trial, (country, centres, settings), participants (recruitment, inclusion and exclusion criteria, baseline characteristics of participants such as age, sex, ethnicity, coexisting diseases or co-morbidities, and socioeconomic status), treatment (duration, intensity/dose of treatment, timing and delivery format), and the outcomes assessment from selected reviews.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 98 systematic reviews were selected (57 Cochrane reviews and 41 non-Cochrane reviews); 49 evaluated interventions aimed at reducing or stopping tobacco use and 49 treating or preventing HIV infection. The setting of the individual studies was reported in 45 (46%) of the systematic reviews, the number of centres in 21 (21%), and the country where the trial took place in 62 (63%). Inclusion and exclusion criteria of the included studies were reported in 16 (16%) and 13 (13%) of the reviews, respectively. Baseline characteristics of participants in the included studies were described in 59 (60%) of the reviews. These characteristics concerned age in about half of the reviews, sex in 46 (47%), and ethnicity in 9 (9%).</p> <p>Applicability of results was discussed in 13 (13%) of the systematic reviews. The reporting was better in systematic reviews by the Cochrane Collaboration than by non-Cochrane groups.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our study highlighted the lack of consideration of applicability of results in systematic reviews of research into 2 public health priorities: tobacco consumption and HIV infection.</p

    A cluster randomized trial of standard quality improvement versus patient-centered interventions to enhance depression care for African Americans in the primary care setting: study protocol NCT00243425

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Several studies document disparities in access to care and quality of care for depression for African Americans. Research suggests that patient attitudes and clinician communication behaviors may contribute to these disparities. Evidence links patient-centered care to improvements in mental health outcomes; therefore, quality improvement interventions that enhance this dimension of care are promising strategies to improve treatment and outcomes of depression among African Americans. This paper describes the design of the BRIDGE (Blacks Receiving Interventions for Depression and Gaining Empowerment) Study. The goal of the study is to compare the effectiveness of two interventions for African-American patients with depression--a standard quality improvement program and a patient-centered quality improvement program. The main hypothesis is that patients in the patient-centered group will have a greater reduction in their depression symptoms, higher rates of depression remission, and greater improvements in mental health functioning at six, twelve, and eighteen months than patients in the standard group. The study also examines patient ratings of care and receipt of guideline-concordant treatment for depression.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>A total of 36 primary care clinicians and 132 of their African-American patients with major depressive disorder were recruited into a cluster randomized trial. The study uses intent-to-treat analyses to compare the effectiveness of standard quality improvement interventions (academic detailing about depression guidelines for clinicians and disease-oriented care management for their patients) and patient-centered quality improvement interventions (communication skills training to enhance participatory decision-making for clinicians and care management focused on explanatory models, socio-cultural barriers, and treatment preferences for their patients) for improving outcomes over 12 months of follow-up.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The BRIDGE Study includes clinicians and African-American patients in under-resourced community-based practices who have not been well-represented in clinical trials to improve depression care. The patient-centered and culturally targeted approach to depression care is a relatively new one that has not been tested in most previous studies. The study will provide evidence about whether patient-centered accommodations improve quality of care and outcomes to a greater extent than standard quality improvement strategies for African Americans with depression.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00243425</p

    MRC special issue on fast multi-dimensional NMR methods

    No full text

    NMR-based metabolomics and fluxomics: developments and future prospects

    No full text
    International audienceNMR spectroscopy is an essential analytical technique in metabolomics and fluxomics workflows, owing to its high structural elucidation capabilities combined with its intrinsic quantitative nature. However, routine NMR "omic" analytical methods suffer from several drawbacks that may have limited its use as a tool of choice, in particular when compared to another widely used technique, mass spectrometry. This review describes, in a critical and perspective discussion, how some of the most recent developments emerging from the NMR community could act as real game changers for metabolomics and fluxomics in the near future. Advanced developments to make NMR metabolomics more resolutive, more sensitive and more accessible are described, as well as new approaches to improve the identification of biomarkers. We hope that this review will convince a broad end-users community of the increasing role of NMR in the "omic" world at the beginning of the 2020s

    Fast and Ultrafast Quantitative 2D NMR: Vital Tools for Efficient Metabolomic Approaches

    No full text
    International audienceNuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) offers great potential for quantitative analysis of metabolic samples, but accurate and precise quantitative analysis is often made difficult by a high degree of spectral overlap. Multi-dimensional NMR offers an interesting alternative, as it provides a much better discrimination of resonances. However, its use for quantitative analysis is limited by its long acquisition duration and its multi-impulsional character. Nevertheless, numerous improvements in the quantitative performance of 2D NMR have been made during the past decade, facilitating a wide range of applications. This review assesses the recent contributions brought to the field of quantitative 2D NMR, and provides a survey of recent studies of metabolic samples using this methodology. The ongoing need for developing and optimizing powerful tools is first examined. It highlights the necessity of reducing the experimental duration, resulting in a fast 2D NMR approach. This methodology is then described, relying on recent applications to metabolic samples. The last section of the chapter describes a more recent approach, ultrafast 2D NMR, which makes it possible to record multi-dimensional spectra in a single scan. The principles and the analytical performances of this novel methodology are described, as well as its perspectives in terms of quantitative analysis

    Sensitivity losses and line shape modifications due to molecular diffusion in continuous encoding ultrafast 2D NMR experiments

    No full text
    Recent ultrafast techniques make it possible to obtain multidimensional (nD) NMR spectra in a single scan. These ultrafast methods rely on a spatial encoding process based on radiofrequency (RF) pulses applied Simultaneously with magnetic field gradients. Numerous approaches have been proposed in the past few years to perform this excitation process, most of them relying on a continuous excitation of the spins throughout the whole sample. However, the resolution and sensitivity of ultrafast nD spectra are often reduced by molecular diffusion effects due to the presence of gradients during the excitation process. In particular, increasing the excitation period is necessary to improve the resolution in the ultrafast dimension, but it leads to high sensitivity losses due to diffusion. In order to understand better and to limit molecular diffusion effects, a detailed theoretical and experimental study of the various continuous ultrafast excitation processes is carried out in the present Study. New numerical Simulations Of ultrafast echo line shapes are presented and compared to experimental data. The evolution of the signal intensity with the excitation process duration is also simulated and compared to experimental intensity losses. The different excitation schemes are compared in order to determine the best excitation conditions to perform 2D ultrafast experiments with optimum resolution and sensitivity. The experimental and theoretical results put in evidence the efficiency of the multi-echo scheme. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
    corecore