8 research outputs found

    Implicit bias in healthcare: Maternal and infant morbidity and mortality in minority patients

    No full text
    There are significant racial and ethnic disparities in the United States affecting maternal and infant morbidity and mortality in minority women. For example, African American and Alaska Native women are two to three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related deaths compared to white women. An often-overlooked healthcare delivery system factor, implicit bias, has been identified as one of the components contributing to these healthcare disparities. Implicit bias in healthcare is of significant public health importance as over 60% of the observed pregnancy-related deaths were deemed preventable and premature births societal cost adds up to at least $26B per year. This essay is a literature review that focuses on disparate reproductive health outcomes in minority women and how implicit bias, such as decision making affects their healthcare. Extensive peer-reviewed literature, reports, and media articles were used to address and highlight the effects of implicit bias on minority patients. All studies used for this research found significant inverse relationships between implicit bias and lower quality of care. California has already been leading the way to curb the state’s maternal mortality rates by investigating and identifying opportunities. Post implementation of initiatives, California observed reduction of maternal mortality rate in the US from 26.4 deaths to 7 deaths per 100,000 live births, declining maternal mortality rate by 55 percent. California has been setting an example for the rest of the country and now the state has passed a bill requiring continuing education implicit bias training for clinicians. There is a compelling need for public health to take a deeper dive into improving health-related outcomes in this already vulnerable population. This literature review proposes recommendations to combat the rising rates of maternal and infant mortality by implementing mandatory bias training policies and increasing nationally mandated credible data collection. Identifying and implementing effective strategies to eliminate racial inequities in health status and medical care should be made a priority. The rest of the US should use California’s bill as a major step in the right direction and follow their lead

    Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), cell-mediated immunity, and survival in the context of cancer

    No full text
    PurposeAdverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been shown to be associated with increased risk of mortality. The biobehavioral mechanisms linking adverse events and survival in cancer patients remain unclear. The aims of the study were to: (1) examine the rates and types of early adverse events in patients diagnosed with cancer; (2) investigate the association of adverse events with circulating cytokines, representing immune status of the patient; and (3) test whether immune markers mediated the association between early adverse events and survival while adjusting for other factors that are associated with immunity (e.g., fatigue) and survival (e.g., depression).Patients and methodsThe patients were recruited from an outpatient oncology clinic. Patients were administered a battery of questionnaires including the Traumatic Events Survey and the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale. Blood was collected and serum levels of cytokines were assessed to characterize immune status. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests and Cox regression were performed to address study aims.ResultsOf the 408 patients, 66% reported at least one ACE. After adjusting for demographic, disease-specific factors, and psychological/behavioral factors; having had a major upheaval between parents during childhood or adolescence was associated with poorer survival [β = -0.702, HR = 0.496, p = 0.034]. Lower levels of interleukin-2 (IL-2) explained, in part, the link between this early adverse event and poorer survival as when IL-2 was entered into the model, a major upheaval between one's parents and survival was no longer significant [β = -0.612, HR = 0.542, p = 0.104].ConclusionHaving experienced an ACE was associated with lower IL-2 levels-a growth factor for anti-inflammatory T-regulatory lymphocytes-central in contemporary immunotherapy, as well as poorer survival in those diagnosed with cancer. Since lower IL-2 levels also explained, in part, the link between the ACE involving parental upheaval and survival, there is support for a psychoneuroimmunological model of disease course in this vulnerable population

    National Mental Health Survey of India, 2016 - Rationale, design and methods.

    No full text
    Understanding the burden and pattern of mental disorders as well as mapping the existing resources for delivery of mental health services in India, has been a felt need over decades. Recognizing this necessity, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, commissioned the National Mental Health Survey (NMHS) in the year 2014-15. The NMHS aimed to estimate the prevalence and burden of mental health disorders in India and identify current treatment gaps, existing patterns of health-care seeking, service utilization patterns, along with an understanding of the impact and disability due to these disorders. This paper describes the design, steps and the methodology adopted for phase 1 of the NMHS conducted in India. The NMHS phase 1 covered a representative population of 39,532 from 12 states across 6 regions of India, namely, the states of Punjab and Uttar Pradesh (North); Tamil Nadu and Kerala (South); Jharkhand and West Bengal (East); Rajasthan and Gujarat (West); Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh (Central) and Assam and Manipur (North East). The NMHS of India (2015-16) is a unique representative survey which adopted a uniform and standardized methodology which sought to overcome limitations of previous surveys. It employed a multi-stage, stratified, random cluster sampling technique, with random selection of clusters based on Probability Proportionate to Size. It was expected that the findings from the NMHS 2015-16 would reveal the burden of mental disorders, the magnitude of the treatment gap, existing challenges and prevailing barriers in the mental-health delivery systems in the country at a single point in time. It is hoped that the results of NMHS will provide the evidence to strengthen and implement mental health policies and programs in the near future and provide the rationale to enhance investment in mental health care in India. It is also hoped that the NMHS will provide a framework for conducting similar population based surveys on mental health and other public health problems in low and middle-income countries
    corecore