Diagnostic Accuracy of Adrenal Iodine-131 6-Beta-Iodomethyl-19-Norcholesterol Scintigraphy for the Subtyping of Primary Aldosteronism

Adrenalectomia; Aldosteronisme primariAdrenalectomy; Primary aldosteronismAdrenalectomia; Aldosteronismo primarioPurpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the 131I-6β-iodomethyl-19-norcholesterol (NP-59) adrenal scintigraphy for the subtyping diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA), considering as gold standard for the diagnosis of unilateral PA (UPA), either the results of the adrenal venous sampling (AVS) or the outcome after adrenalectomy. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was performed on PA patients from 14 Spanish tertiary hospitals who underwent NP-59 scintigraphy with an available subtyping diagnosis. Patients were classified as UPA if biochemical cure was achieved after adrenalectomy or/and if an AVS lateralization index > 4 with ACTH stimulation or >2 without ACTH stimulation was observed. Patients were classified as having bilateral PA (BPA) if the AVS lateralization index was ≤4 with ACTH or ≤2 without ACTH stimulation or if there was evidence of bilateral adrenal nodules >1 cm in each adrenal gland detected by CT/MRI. Results: A total of 86 patients with PA were included (70.9% (n = 61) with UPA and 29.1% (n = 25) with BPA). Based on the NP-59 scintigraphy results, 16 patients showed normal suppressed adrenal gland uptake, and in the other 70 cases, PA was considered unilateral in 49 patients (70%) and bilateral in 21 (30%). Based on 59-scintigraphy results, 10.4% of the patients with unilateral uptake had BPA, and 27.3% of the cases with bilateral uptake had UPA. The AUC of the ROC curve of the NP-59 scintigraphy for PA subtyping was 0.812 [0.707–0.916]. Based on the results of the CT/MRI and NP-59 scintigraphy, only 6.7% of the patients with unilateral uptake had BPA, and 24% of the cases with bilateral uptake had UPA. The AUC of the ROC curve of the model combining CT/MRI and 59-scintigraphy results for subtyping PA was 0.869 [0.782–0.957]. Conclusion: The results of NP-59 scintigraphy in association with the information provided by the CT/MRI may be useful for PA subtyping. However, their diagnostic accuracy is only moderate. Therefore, it should be considered a second-line diagnostic tool when AVS is not an option

Autonomous cortisol secretion in patients with primary aldosteronism: prevalence and implications on cardiometabolic profile and on surgical outcomes

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS) in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) and its implications on cardiometabolic and surgical outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter study of PA patients who underwent 1 mg dexamethasone-suppression test (DST) during diagnostic workup in 21 Spanish tertiary hospitals. ACS was defined as a cortisol post-DST >1.8 μg/dL (confirmed ACS if >5 μg/dL and possible ACS if 1.8–5 μg/dL) in the absence of spe cific clinical features of hypercortisolism. The cardiometabolic profile was compared with a control group with ACS without PA (ACS group) matched for age and DST levels. Results: The prevalence of ACS in the global cohort of patients with PA (n = 176) was 29% (ACS–PA; n = 51). Ten patients had confirmed ACS and 41 possible ACS. The cardiometabolic profile of ACS–PA and PA-only patients was simil ar, except for older age and larger tumor size of the adrenal lesion in the ACS–PA group. When comparing the ACS–PA group (n = 51) and the ACS group (n = 78), the prevalence of hypertension (OR 7.7 (2.64–22.32)) and cardiovascular events (OR 5.0 (2.29–11.07)) was higher in ACS–PA patients than in ACS patients. The coexistence of ACS in patien ts with PA did not affect the surgical outcomes, the proportion of biochemical cure and clinical cure being similar between ACS–PA and PA-only groups. Conclusion: Co-secretion of cortisol and aldosterone affects almost one-thi rd of patients with PA. Its occurrence is more frequent in patients with larger tumors and advanced age. However, the cardiometabolic and surgical outcomes of patients with ACS–PA and PA-only are similar

Bronchial Carcinoids: From Molecular Background to Treatment Approach

A better understanding of the genetic and molecular background of bronchial carcinoids (BCs) would allow a better estimation of the risk of disease progression and the personalization of treatment in cases of advanced disease. Molecular studies confirmed that lungs neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are different entities; thus, no progression of NET to NEC is expected. In BCs, MEN1 gene mutations and deletions and decreased gene expression have been associated with a poor prognosis. ATRX mutation has also been linked to a shorter disease-specific survival. In terms of therapeutic targets, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway mutations have been described in 13% of typical carcinoids (TCs) and 39% of atypical carcinoids (ACs), representing a targetable mutation with kinase inhibitors. Regarding treatment, surgical resection is usually curative in localized BCs and adjuvant treatment is not routinely recommended. Multiple options for systemic therapy exist for patients with advanced BCs, although limited by a heterogeneity in the scientific evidence behind their use recommendation. These options include somatostatin analogues, everolimus, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, antiangiogenic agents, and immunotherapy. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review about the molecular and genetic background of BCs, and about the treatment of local and metastatic disease, as well as the main paraneoplastic syndromes that have been associated with this tumor

Effect of cabergoline on tumor remnant after surgery in nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma

[Abstract] Background: In recent years, dopamine agonists (DAs) have become an attractive therapeutic option to prevent both tumor growth and post-surgical tumor remnant growth in clinically non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA). Aim: To analyze our experience on the effect of cabergoline (CAB) on tumor remnant after initial surgery in NFPA patients. Patients and methods: A retrospective and multicenter study of NFPA patients with tumor remnant after surgery treated with CAB was performed. Results: From a total of 142 NFPA patients (79 men, 55.2%; mean age 57.2 ± 14.2 year) who underwent surgery, we selected 62/142 (43.7%) patients (32 men, 51.6%; mean age 59.3 ± 13.9 year) with tumor persistence (TP) after surgery. In 22/62 (35.5%) TP patients CAB was used (CAB group), while the rest of the patients (40/62, 64.5%) underwent active surveillance [observation (OBS) group)]. The maximum diameter of the tumor remnant did not change significantly in either the CAB group [11.5 (6.0-16.9) mm vs. 12.0 (7.0-15.0) mm, p = 0.85) or the OBS group [8.5 (6.0-13.7) mm vs. 9.0 (6.2-14.0) mm, p = 0.064) at the end of the follow-up [13 (10.5-17) vs. 77.5 (50.2-107.2) months, CAB vs. OBS group; p < 0.001]. At the end of the treatment period with CAB most of the patients (n = 20/22, 90.9%) showed no progression of the tumor remnant [stable disease, SD (n = 17/22, 77.2%) and partial response, PR (n = 3/22, 13.6%)], while 2/22 patients (9.1%) exhibited progression. Similar response rates were observed in the OBS group [SD (n = 32/40, 80%), PR (n = 2/40, 5%), and progression (n = 6/40, 15%)]. Although no statistically significant differences (p = 0.42) were found in these responses, the percentage of progression was 1.65 times higher in the OBS group compared to the CAB group. On the contrary, the percentage of PR was 2.72 times higher in the CAB group compared to the OBS group, despite a significantly shorter follow-up period in the CAB group. Conclusion: Although the present study showed no significant differences in the type of tumor response between the CAB and OBS groups of patients, the percentage of PR was higher and that of progression lower in the CAB group compared to the OBS group. This finding does not rule out a potential therapeutic benefit of CAB in the management of tumor remnant in patients with NFPA undergoing surgery

Differences in the presentation and evolution of primary aldosteronism in elderly (≥65 years) and young patients (<65 years).

To compare the presentation and evolution of primary aldosteronism (PA) in the elderly (≥65 years) and young patients ( A retrospective multicenter study was performed in 20 Spanish hospitals of PA patients in follow-up between 2018 and 2021. Three hundred fifty-two patients with PA Older patients with PA have a worse cardiometabolic profile than young patients with PA that it is related to a longer duration of hypertension. However, the results of the AVS, and adrenalectomy are similar in both groups. Therefore, the management of elderly patients with PA should be based not only on age, but rather on the overall medical, physical, social, and mental characteristics of the patients