A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saroglitazar in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Introduction: Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) without biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) are at increased risk of liver-related mortality. Saroglitazar is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist with dual PPAR agonistic properties (α/γ). There is a strong mechanistic rationale for studying saroglitazar in PBC because PPARα is a molecular target of fibrates that showed improvements in liver tests in patients with PBC. Methods: In this 16-week, open-label, phase 3 study, 37 patients were screened across 3 clinical centers to enroll 7 patients. All patients received daily dose of saroglitazar 4 mg for 16 weeks in addition to their ongoing treatment with UDCA. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level at week 16 as compared to baseline. Results: Mean age of the study population was 51.1 ± 10.0 years, all patients were female of Mexican descent, and mean body mass index was 25.5± = 4.8 kg/m2. Six (85.7%) patients reported taking ursodiol at baseline and continued throughout the study with a mean daily dosage of 417 mg. Among these, the daily dosage of UDCA 500 mg in 4 and 250 mg in 2 subjects, respectively. The mean baseline ALP level was 230 ± 103 U/L. The primary efficacy endpoint, mean change (reduction) from baseline in ALP concentration at week 16 based on the modified intent-to-treat population was -94 ± 53 U/L (P = 0.003), corresponding to a reduction of 48 ± 23%. Treatment with saroglitazar 4 mg resulted in a rapid and sustained decrease of ALP levels at week 4 (-84 ± 47 U/L, P = 0.003). Six patients who completed the study achieved mean ALP reduction of at least 40% at week 4 and all subsequent visits. Discussion: Although the study was terminated because of lack of enrollment, saroglitazar daily for 16 weeks resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in ALP with an acceptable safety profile in patients with PBC

Saroglitazar is noninferior to fenofibrate in reducing triglyceride levels in hypertriglyceridemic patients in a randomized clinical trial

Saroglitazar, being a dual PPAR-α/γ agonist, has shown beneficial effect in diabetic dyslipidemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Fibrates are commonly used to treat severe hypertriglyceridemia. However, the effect of saroglitazar in patients with moderate to severe hypertriglyceridemia was not evaluated. We conducted a study to compare the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar (4 mg) with fenofibrate (160 mg) in patients with moderate to severe hypertriglyceridemia. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, active-control, and noninferiority trial in adult patients with fasting triglyceride (TG) levels of 500–1,500 mg/dl. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive daily dose of saroglitazar or fenofibrate for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percent change in TG levels at week 12 relative to baseline. The study comprised of 41 patients in the saroglitazar group and 41 patients in the fenofibrate group. We found that the percent reduction from baseline in TG levels at week 12 was significantly higher in the saroglitazar group (least square mean = −55.3%; SE = 4.9) compared with the fenofibrate group (least square mean = −41.1%; SE = 4.9; P = 0.048). Overall, 37 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported in 24 patients (saroglitazar: 13; fenofibrate: 11). No serious AEs were reported, and no patient discontinued the study because of AEs. We conclude that saroglitazar (4 mg) is noninferior to fenofibrate (160 mg) in reducing TG levels after 12 weeks of treatment, was safe, and well tolerated

Saroglitazar improves nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic health in liver transplant recipients.

NAFLD is common after liver transplantation (LT) and is associated with an increased metabolic burden. Currently, there is a paucity of investigations into the treatment of post-LT NAFLD. In the present study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar, a novel dual peroxisome proliferator-associated receptor α/γ agonist, on the treatment of post-LT NAFLD and metabolic burden. This is a phase 2A, single-center, open-label, single-arm study in which patients with post-LT NAFLD received saroglitazar magnesium 4 mg daily for 24 weeks. NAFLD was defined by a controlled attenuation parameter ≥264 dB/m. The primary endpoint was the reduction in liver fat as measured by MRI proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Secondary MRI-based metabolic endpoints included visceral adipose tissue, abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes, muscle fat infiltration, and fat-free muscle volume. Saroglitazar treatment led to a reduction in MRI-PDFF from 10.3±10.5% at baseline to 8.1±7.6%. A relative 30% reduction from baseline MRI-PDFF value was noted in 47% of all patients and 63% of patients with baseline MRI-PDFF \u3e5%. Reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase was an independent predictor of MRI-PDFF response. Saroglitazar did not decrease fat-free muscle volume nor increase muscle fat infiltration, but did lead to a mild increase in visceral adipose tissue and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue. The study drug was well tolerated and a mild nonsignificant increase in serum creatinine was noted. Saroglitazar did not affect the weight. The study provides preliminary data demonstrating the safety and metabolic benefits of saroglitazar in LT recipients and underscores the importance of future studies to establish its efficacy after LT

Saroglitazar, a PPAR-α/γ Agonist, for Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Phase 2 Trial

Background and Aims Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by insulin resistance and dysregulated lipid and glucose metabolism. Saroglitazar, a novel dual peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-α/γ agonist, improves insulin sensitivity, and lipid and glycemic parameters. Saroglitazar improved nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) histology in animal studies. In this randomized controlled clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar in patients with NAFLD/NASH. Approach & Results A total of 106 patients with NAFLD/NASH with ALT ≥50 U/L at baseline and body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive placebo or saroglitazar 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline in ALT levels at Week 16. Liver fat content (LFC) was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction. The least squares (LS) mean (SE) percent change from baseline in ALT at Week 16 was -25.5% (5.8), -27.7% (5.9) and -45.8% (5.7) with saroglitazar 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg, respectively versus 3.4% (5.6) in placebo (p0.05). Conclusions Saroglitazar 4 mg significantly improved ALT, LFC, insulin resistance and atherogenic dyslipidemia in participants with NAFLD/NASH

Proof-of-concept study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

Saroglitazar is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist with dual agonistic properties (α/γ). Due to a strong mechanistic rationale, we aimed to test the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who were either ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) resistant or intolerant. In this double-blind, phase II proof-of-concept trial, 37 patients with PBC were randomized to saroglitazar 4 mg (n = 13), saroglitazar 2 mg (n = 14), or placebo (n = 10) daily for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level at Week 16. A significant reduction of mean ALP levels was observed at Week 16 relative to baseline in both the saroglitazar 4 mg (least-squares [LS] mean =-163.3 U/L, SE = 25.1, p <0.001) and 2 mg (LS mean =-155.8 U/L, SE = 24.4, p <0.001) groups, compared with placebo (LS mean =-21.1 U/L, SE = 28.9). Treatment with saroglitazar resulted in a rapid reduction of ALP concentration at Week 4 that was sustained through the study duration. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 11 (84.6%) patients in the saroglitazar 4 mg group, in 12 (85.7%) patients in the 2 mg group and in 8 (80%) patients in the placebo group. Study drug was discontinued in 4 patients (3 patients in the 4 mg group and 1 patient in the 2 mg group) due to aminotransferase increases that promptly returned to baseline values after drug discontinuation. Saroglitazar at 2 mg and 4 mg daily was tolerated and resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in ALP. Further studies are underway at a daily dose of 2 mg and 1 mg due to the higher incidence of elevated liver enzymes observed with the 4 mg dose. NCT03112681 Saroglitazar resulted in a rapid and sustained improvement in alkaline phosphatase levels in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. The mean percentage reductions in alkaline phosphatase levels were 49% and 51% in the saroglitazar 4 mg and 2 mg groups compared to 3% in the placebo group. [Display omitted] •Saroglitazar is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist with dual agonistic properties (α/γ).•A statistically significant reduction in ALP levels was observed at Week 16 in saroglitazar 4 mg and 2 mg groups compared to placebo.•The reduction in ALP levels corresponded to a mean % reduction of 49% and 51% in the saroglitazar 4 mg and 2 mg groups, respectively

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antimalarial activity of the novel triaminopyrimidine ZY-19489: a first-in-human, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single ascending dose study, pilot food-effect study, and volunteer infection study.

Background New antimalarials with novel mechanisms of action are needed to combat the emergence of drug resistance. Triaminopyrimidines comprise a novel antimalarial class identified in a high-throughput screen against asexual blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum. This first-in-human study aimed to characterise the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antimalarial activity of the triaminopyrimidine ZY-19489 in healthy volunteers. Methods A three-part clinical trial was conducted in healthy adults (aged 18–55 years) in Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Part one was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study in which participants enrolled into one of six dose groups (25, 75, 150, 450, 900, or 1500 mg) were randomly assigned (3:1) to ZY-19489 or placebo. Part two was an open-label, randomised, two-period cross-over, pilot food-effect study in which participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to a fasted-fed or a fed-fasted sequence. Part three was an open-label, randomised, volunteer infection study using the P falciparum induced blood-stage malaria model in which participants were enrolled into one of two cohorts, with participants in cohort one all receiving the same dose of ZY-19489 and participants in cohort two randomly assigned to receive one of two doses. The primary outcome for all three parts was the incidence, severity, and relationship to ZY-19489 of adverse events. Secondary outcomes were estimation of ZY-19489 pharmacokinetic parameters for all parts; how these parameters were affected by the fed state for part two only; and the parasite reduction ratio, parasite clearance half-life, recrudescent parasitaemia, and pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modelling parameters for part three only. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000127101, ACTRN12619001466134, and ACTRN12619001215112). Findings 48 participants were enrolled in part one (eight per cohort for 25–1500 mg cohorts), eight in part two (four in each group, all dosed with 300 mg), and 15 in part three (five dosed with 200 mg, eight with 300 mg, and two with 900 mg). In part one, the incidence of drug-related adverse events was higher in the 1500 mg dose group (occurring in all six participants) than in lower-dose groups and the placebo group (occurring in one of six in the 25 mg group, two of six in the 75 mg group, three of six in the 150 mg group, two of six in the 450 mg group, four of six in the 900 mg group, and four of 12 in the placebo group), due to the occurrence of mild gastrointestinal symptoms. Maximum plasma concentrations occurred 5–9 h post-dosing, and the elimination half-life was 50–97 h across the dose range. In part two, three of seven participants had a treatment-related adverse event in the fed state and four of eight in the fasted state. Dosing in the fed state delayed absorption (maximum plasma concentration occurred a median of 12·0 h [range 7·5–16·0] after dosing in the fed state vs 6·0 h [4·5–9·1] in the fasted state) but had no effect on overall exposure (difference in area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 [dosing] extrapolated to infinity between fed and fasted states was −0·013 [90% CI −0·11 to 0·08]). In part three, drug-related adverse events occurred in four of five participants in the 200 mg group, seven of eight in the 300 mg group, and both participants in the 900 mg group. Rapid initial parasite clearance occurred in all participants following dosing (clearance half-life 6·6 h [95% CI 6·2–6·9] for 200 mg, 6·8 h [95% CI 6·5–7·1] for 300 mg, and 7·1 h [95% CI 6·6–7·6] for 900 mg). Recrudescence occurred in four of five participants in the 200 mg group, five of eight in the 300 mg group, and neither of the two participants in the 900 mg group. Simulations done using a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model predicted that a single dose of 1100 mg would clear baseline parasitaemia by a factor of 10 9 . Interpretation The safety, pharmacokinetic profile, and antimalarial activity of ZY-19489 in humans support the further development of the compound as a novel antimalarial therapy