Optimal opportunistic screening of atrial fibrillation using pulse palpation in cardiology outpatient clinics: Who and how

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remain a prevalent undiagnosed condition frequently encountered in primary care.We aimed to find the parameters that optimize the diagnostic accuracy of pulse palpation to detect AF. We also aimed to create a simple algorithm for selecting which individuals would benefit from pulse palpation and, if positive, receive an ECG to detect AF.Nurses from four Cardiology outpatient clinics palpated 7,844 pulses according to a randomized list of arterial territories and durations of measure and immediately followed by a 12-lead ECG, which we used as the reference standard. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the palpation parameters. We also assessed whether diagnostic accuracy depended on the nurse's experience or on a list of clinical factors of the patients. With this information, we estimated the positive predictive values and false omission rates according to very few clinical factors readily available in primary care (age, sex, and diagnosis of heart failure) and used them to create the algorithm.The parameters associated with the highest diagnostic accuracy were palpation of the radial artery and classifying as irregular those palpations in which the nurse was uncertain about pulse regularity or unable to palpate pulse (sensitivity = 79%; specificity = 86%). Specificity decreased with age. Neither the nurse's experience nor any investigated clinical factor influenced diagnostic accuracy. We provide the algorithm to select the ≥40 years old individuals that would benefit from a pulse palpation screening: a) do nothing in <60 years old individuals without heart failure; b) do ECG in ≥70 years old individuals with heart failure; c) do radial pulse palpation in the remaining individuals and do ECG if the pulse is irregular or you are uncertain about its regularity or unable to palpate it.Opportunistic screening for AF using optimal pulse palpation in candidate individuals according to a simple algorithm may have high effectiveness in detecting AF in primary care

Left atrial and auricular thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation: from pathophysiology to treatment

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and its prevalence is increasing, partly due to the progressive aging of the population. AF predisposes to thrombus formation in the atria and the atrial appendage through a complex interaction among local, systemic and hemodynamic factors, significantly increasing the risk for cerebral and systemic thromboembolic events. These complications have a major impact in terms of morbidity and mortality, and numerous therapeutic strategies have been proposed to reduce such risk. Systemic anticoagulation is the main strategy in the prevention of atrial and left atrial appendage thrombosis, and the advent of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has been a significant step forward, especially for safety, compared to warfarin. While prevention of atrial appendage thrombosis with NOACs has been widely explored, their role in the resolution of thrombi is less clear. The use of NOACs in this setting is largely unexplored, and some studies are underway to clarify their effectiveness. The objective of this paper is to review the literature on atrial and left atrial appendage thrombosis, describing pathophysiological mechanisms and current treatment strategies using NOACs

Left atrial and auricular thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation: from pathophysiology to treatment

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent sustained cardiac arrhythmia, and its prevalence is increasing, partly due to the progressive aging of the population. AF predisposes to thrombus formation in the atria and the atrial appendage through a complex interaction among local, systemic and hemodynamic factors, significantly increasing the risk for cerebral and systemic thromboembolic events. These complications have a major impact in terms of morbidity and mortality, and numerous therapeutic strategies have been proposed to reduce such risk. Systemic anticoagulation is the main strategy in the prevention of atrial and left atrial appendage thrombosis, and the advent of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has been a significant step forward, especially for safety, compared to warfarin. While prevention of atrial appendage thrombosis with NOACs has been widely explored, their role in the resolution of thrombi is less clear. The use of NOACs in this setting is largely unexplored, and some studies are underway to clarify their effectiveness. The objective of this paper is to review the literature on atrial and left atrial appendage thrombosis, describing pathophysiological mechanisms and current treatment strategies using NOACs

Long-Term Variation in Kidney Function and Its Impact After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Kidney disease (KD) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with major cardiovascular events (MACE). We sought to compare the long-term variation in KD in patients with AMI versus controls and its value as a risk factor for MACE in patients with AMI. A cohort of 300 outpatients with AMI, recruited between 2014 and 2016 in Barcelona, Spain, were compared with a control cohort matched 1:1 based on age and several risk factors for developing KD. Annual estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using MDRD-4 formula and albuminuria were collected and patients were followed up for the occurrence of MACE (death, heart failure hospitalization, AMI, or stroke). After a median follow-up of 5.3 years, the decline in eGFR was more pronounced in patients with AMI (−1.15 ml/min/1.73 m2/ per year in patients with AMI vs −0.81 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year in controls, p = 0.018 between the ß coefficients of both regression slopes). In patients with AMI, those with the greatest eGFR decline during follow-up had more MACE (hazard ratio [HR] for first vs fourth quartiles = 3.33, p &lt;0.001). In multivariate analysis, after excluding patients with baseline KD, a newly diagnosed eGFR &lt;60 ml/min/1.73 m2 during follow-up was associated with MACE (HR = 3.21, p &lt;0.001), as well as new onset albuminuria &gt;30 mg/g (HR = 6.93, p &lt;0.001) and the combination of both (HR 5.63, p &lt;0.001). In conclusion, the decline in eGFR after AMI is more pronounced than in the general population. A longitudinal drop in eGFR and newly diagnosed albuminuria during follow-up are associated with MACE and can be useful tools to reclassify the risk profile after AMI

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial thrombosis: An appraisal of current evidence

Major thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation, secondary to thromboembolism from the left atrium or the left atrial appendage, are a major concern because of their burden of disabling stroke and mortality. To date, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are considered the first-line strategy in most patients with atrial fibrillation receiving chronic anticoagulation, as they have major advantages compared with vitamin K antagonists, including minimization of intracranial bleeding risk. Although several studies and post-hoc analyses have provided initial data on the use of NOACs in patients with documented atrial and/or left atrial appendage thrombosis, the benefit of NOACs in these patients has not been fully elucidated. In this review, we reappraise current evidence supporting the use of NOACs in patients with established atrial and/or left atrial appendage thrombosis, discussing potential mechanisms favouring the use of a NOAC-based strategy in this special setting

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial thrombosis: An appraisal of current evidence

Major thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation, secondary to thromboembolism from the left atrium or the left atrial appendage, are a major concern because of their burden of disabling stroke and mortality. To date, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are considered the first-line strategy in most patients with atrial fibrillation receiving chronic anticoagulation, as they have major advantages compared with vitamin K antagonists, including minimization of intracranial bleeding risk. Although several studies and post-hoc analyses have provided initial data on the use of NOACs in patients with documented atrial and/or left atrial appendage thrombosis, the benefit of NOACs in these patients has not been fully elucidated. In this review, we reappraise current evidence supporting the use of NOACs in patients with established atrial and/or left atrial appendage thrombosis, discussing potential mechanisms favouring the use of a NOAC-based strategy in this special setting

Transradial access versus transfemoral access: a comparison of outcomes and efficacy in reducing hemorrhagic events

Introduction: The radial artery is currently the most widely used access site for PCI procedures both acute and stable patient settings. Thanks to advantages in pharmacological therapy as well as in interventional devices, the rate of ischemic complications following PCI has significantly decreased. Nevertheless, this has been counterbalanced by an increased risk of periprocedural and late bleeding event, that can occur both at access and non-access sites. Choice of access site for PCI is of paramount importance to reduce the risk of access-related bleeding events. Areas covered: The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the actual available evidence comparing the transradial versus transfemoral approach to reduce hemorrhagic events. The most robust evidence comes from large randomized trials, partly also from observational registries, which compared the transradial and transfemoral approach. Expert opinion: Results show that radial access has proved to be decisive in reducing the incidence of hemorrhagic events. Furthermore, it showed a significant reduction in mortality and AKI compared to transfemoral access. However, increased experience in the use of the radial approach has led to less practice in the use of the femoral approach, which may be useful in cases of emergency, complications or inability to use the radial artery