Open versus minimally invasive total gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of a European randomized trial

Background: Surgical resection with adequate lymphadenectomy is regarded the only curative option for gastric cancer. Regarding minimally invasive techniques, mainly Asian studies showed comparable oncological and short-term postoperative outcomes. The incidence of gastric cancer is lower in the Western population and patients often present with more advanced stages of disease. Therefore, the reproducibility of these Asian results in the Western population remains to be investigated. Methods: A randomized trial was performed in thirteen hospitals in Europe. Patients with an indication for total gastrectomy who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible for inclusion and randomized between open total gastrectomy (OTG) or minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MITG). Primary outcome was oncological safety, measured as the number of resected lymph nodes and radicality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, recovery and 1-year survival. Results: Between January 2015 and June 2018, 96 patients were included in this trial. Forty-nine patients were randomized to OTG and 47 to MITG. The mean number of resected lymph nodes was 43.4 ± 17.3 in OTG and 41.7 ± 16.1 in MITG (p = 0.612). Forty-eight patients in the OTG group had a R0 resection and 44 patients in the MITG group (p = 0.617). One-year survival was 90.4% in OTG and 85.5% in MITG (p = 0.701). No significant differences were found regarding postoperative complications and recovery. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence that MITG after neoadjuvant therapy is not inferior regarding oncological quality of resection in comparison to OTG in Western patients with resectable gastric cancer. In addition, no differences in postoperative complications and recovery were seen

Correction to: Open versus minimally invasive total gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results of a European randomized trial (Gastric Cancer, (2021), 24, 1, (258-271), 10.1007/s10120-020-01109-w)

In the original publication of the article, the co-author name “Christoph Reiβfelder” was incorrectly published

Health related quality of life following open versus minimally invasive total gastrectomy for cancer: Results from a randomized clinical trial

Introduction: Minimally invasive techniques show improved short-term and comparable long-term outcomes compared to open techniques in the treatment of gastric cancer and improved survival has been seen with the implementation of multimodality treatment. Therefore, focus of research has shifted towards optimizing treatment regimens and improving quality of life. Materials and methods: A randomized trial was performed in thirteen hospitals in Europe. Patients were randomized between open total gastrectomy (OTG) or minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MITG) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This study investigated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following OTG or MITG, using the Euro-Qol-5D (EQ-5D) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires, modules C30 and STO22. Due to multiple testing a p-value < 0.001 was deemed statistically significant. Results: Between January 2015 and June 2018, 96 patients were included in this trial. Forty-nine patients were randomized to OTG and 47 to MITG. A response compliance of 80% was achieved for all PROMs. The EQ5D overall health score one year after surgery was 85 (60–90) in the open group and 68 (50–83.8) in the minimally invasive group (P = 0.049). The median EORTC-QLQ-C30 overall health score one year postoperatively was 83,3 (66,7–83,3) in the open group and 58,3 (35,4–66,7) in the minimally invasive group (P = 0.002). This was not statistically significant. Conclusion: No differences were observed between open total gastrectomy and minimally invasive total gastrectomy regarding HRQoL data, collected using the EQ-5D, EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-STO22 questionnaires

La retórica y el debate como herramientas de aprendizaje

Convocatoria proyectos de innovación de Extremadura 2019/2020Se describe un proyecto llevado a cabo en el IES San Fernando (Badajoz) surgido del Departamento de Filosofía que tiene como objetivo principal mejorar las habilidades comunicativas del alumnado. Se pretendía que supieran hablar, transmitir ideas y opiniones, saber escuchar, compartir posturas, rebatir y estar preparados para cambiar de opinión. Otros objetivos del trabajo fueron: transmitir una visión de sociedad que se basa en el diálogo constructivo a través de una interacción respetuosa, rigurosamente fundamentada, reflexiva e inclusiva; lograr en los alumnos el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico y conseguir que comprendan la información que reciben, las inferencias y que sean capaces de evaluarla y generar nuevas propuestasExtremaduraES

II jornadas de intercambio de prácticas educativas en las aulas especializadas

Las Aulas Especializadas han sido un recurso de calidad y ha presentado un avance notable en las condiciones de escolarización del alumnado con trastornos del espectro autista, con trastornos específico del lenguaje, con discapacidad motriz y con polidiscapacidad. La satisfacción de los padres y madres, del profesorado y los progresos del alumnado avalan el camino emprendido. Lo que en el año 2002 eran experiencias de innovación pedagógica son una realidad repartida por toda la geografía andaluza. Se ha avanzado mucho, pero se debe seguir haciéndolo, completando la red de aulas, consolidando una oferta especializada en todas las provincias y, sobre todo, elevando el nivel técnico de los profesionales mediante actividades de formación como estas II Jornadas de Intercambio de Prácticas Educativas. Con ellas se ha querido facilitar que los maestros y maestras de toda Andalucía compartan sus recurso, sus estrategias metodológicas y sus conocimientos para conseguir una escuela más eficiente, más justa y más solidaria.AndalucíaInstituto Psicopedagógico Dulce Nombre de María (Málaga); Calle Manuel de Palacio, 17; 29017 Málaga; +34902290499; [email protected]