15 research outputs found

    A Functional Proteomic Method for Biomarker Discovery

    Get PDF
    The sequencing of the human genome holds out the hope for personalized medicine, but it is clear that analysis of DNA or RNA content alone is not sufficient to understand most disease processes. Proteomic strategies that allow unbiased identification of proteins and their post-transcriptional and -translation modifications are an essential complement to genomic strategies. However, the enormity of the proteome and limitations in proteomic methods make it difficult to determine the targets that are particularly relevant to human disease. Methods are therefore needed that allow rational identification of targets based on function and relevance to disease. Screening methodologies such as phage display, SELEX, and small-molecule combinatorial chemistry have been widely used to discover specific ligands for cells or tissues of interest, such as tumors. Those ligands can be used in turn as affinity probes to identify their cognate molecular targets when they are not known in advance. Here we report an easy, robust and generally applicable approach in which phage particles bearing cell- or tissue-specific peptides serve directly as the affinity probes for their molecular targets. For proof of principle, the method successfully identified molecular binding partners, three of them novel, for 15 peptides specific for pancreatic cancer

    Incident infection in high-priority HIV molecular transmission clusters in the United States.

    No full text
    ObjectiveTo identify correlates of incident HIV infection in rapidly growing HIV molecular clusters.DesignPhylogenetic analysis of HIV public health surveillance data.MethodsHigh-priority HIV genetic transmission clusters with evidence of rapid growth in 2012 (i.e. clusters with a pairwise genetic distance ≤0.005 substitutions/site and at least three cases diagnosed in 2012) were identified using HIV-TRACE. Then, we investigated cluster growth, defined as HIV cases diagnosed in the following 5 years that were genetically linked to these clusters. For clusters that grew during the follow-up period, Bayesian molecular clock phylogenetic inference was performed to identify clusters with evidence of incident HIV infection (as opposed to diagnosis of previously infected cases) during this follow-up period.ResultsOf the 116 rapidly growing clusters identified, 73 (63%) had phylogenetic evidence for an incident HIV case during the 5-year follow-up period. Correlates of an incident HIV case arising in clusters included a greater number of diagnosed but virally unsuppressed cases in 2012, a greater number of inferred undiagnosed cases in the cluster in 2012, and a younger time of most recent common ancestor for the cluster.ConclusionThese findings suggest that incident infections in rapidly growing clusters originate equally from diagnosed but unsuppressed cases and undiagnosed infections. These results highlight the importance of promoting retention in care and viral suppression as well as partner notification and other case-finding activities when investigating and intervening on high-priority molecular transmission clusters

    Validation of affinity partner for phage clones.

    No full text
    <p>A) Western blot of the protein that binds to clone 8, probed using anti-pyruvate kinase M2 antibody. B) ELISA of clone 8 incubated with purified pyruvate kinase M2, or with BSA or recombinant annexin A2 as negative controls. C) Western blot of cell fractionation using anti-pyruvate kinase M2 antibody D) ELISA on intact, non-permeabilized L3.6pl cells with anti-pyruvate kinase M2 antibody. E) Western blot of clone 15 associated protein probed with anti annexin A2 antibody. E) ELISA showing binding of clone 15 to annexin A2 protein. F) Western blot of cell fractionation using anti annexin A2 antibody. G) ELISA on intact, non-permeabilized L3.6pl cells with anti-Annexin A2 antibody.</p

    Tissue microarray data.

    No full text
    <p>Values are pathologist's scoring of number of cells stained (0–3) and intensity of staining (0–3) multiplied together. A) Representative tumor section stained for plectin. Note the membrane staining. B) Pathologist's scoring of human cancer biopsy specimens stained for plectin. C) Representative PDAC tumor biopsy section stained for pyruvate kinase M2. D) Pathologist's scoring of pyruvate kinase M2 stained human cancer biopsy tissue sections.</p
    corecore