13 research outputs found

    Human papillomavirus in anal biopsy tissues and liquid-based cytology samples of HIV-positive and HIV-negative Thai men who have sex with men

    No full text
    Background: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk of developing human papillomavirus (HPV)-related anal cancer. We compared HPV genotypes in anal tissues (Bx) and anal liquid-based cytology fluid (LBC) from HIV-positive and HIV-negative MSM. Methods: Bx (32 normal, 41 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and 22 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL)), along with LBC from the same visit, were selected from 61 HIV-positive and 34 HIV-negative MSM who enrolled into a prospective cohort in Bangkok, Thailand. HPV genotyping was performed on Bx and LBC. Results: Any HPV and high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) prevalence were 63.2% and 60.0% in Bx and 71.6% and 62.1% in LBC, respectively. HIV-positive MSM had higher rates of HR-HPV genotypes detection (70.5% vs. 47.1%, p=0.03) in LBC than HIV-negative MSM. HPV16 (27%) was the most common HR-HPV found in HSIL tissue. In HIV-positive MSM, the frequency of HR-HPV detection increased with histopathologic grading in both Bx and LBC samples. HSIL was associated with the presence of any HR-HPV(OR 7.6 (95%CI 1.8â31.9); P=0.006) in LBC and in Bx((OR 5.6 (95%CI 1.4â22.7); P=0.02). Conclusions: Our data strongly support the integration of HR-HPV screening on LBC samples, along with HPV vaccination, into an anal cancer prevention program. Keywords: Human papillomavirus, Anal tissues, Men who have sex with men, HIV, Thailan

    High prevalence and incidence of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia among young Thai men who have sex with men with and without HIV

    No full text
    BackgroundMen who have sex with men (MSM) are at elevated risk of having anal cancer. However, the prevalence and incidence among MSM of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN), the putative precursor of anal cancer, is understudied, particularly in Asians.MethodsA total of 123 HIV-positive and 123 HIV-negative MSM were enrolled at the Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre in Bangkok, Thailand, and followed for 12 months. Anal sample collection for human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping and high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) with biopsies were performed at every visit.ResultsMean age at enrollment was 28.9 years. HIV-positive MSM were more commonly infected with high-risk HPV types in the anus than HIV-negative MSM (57.5 vs. 36.6%; P  =  0.001). The prevalence of HGAIN was 18.9% in HIV-positive and 11.4% in HIV-negative MSM (P  = 0.1). The incidence of HGAIN at 12 months was 29% in HIV-positive and 8% in HIV-negative MSM (P  =  0.001). The hazard ratios for incident HGAIN in multivariate models were 5.16 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.89-14.08, P  < 0.001] in MSM with persistent HPV 16 and/or 18 infection and 2.62 (95% CI 1.04-6.61, P  =  0.042) in HIV-positive MSM.ConclusionsApproximately one-third of HIV-positive MSM developed incident HGAIN within 12 months. Given the relative increased prevalence of HIV among MSM worldwide, local HGAIN data are needed to guide practitioners, policy makers, and communities in planning for strategies to screen for and treat HGAIN in this population

    Use of human papillomavirus DNA, E6/E7 mRNA, and p16 immunocytochemistry to detect and predict anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men who have sex with men.

    Get PDF
    Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk of having anal cancer. Anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) is the precursor of anal cancer. We explored the use of different biomarkers associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and HPV-mediated cell transformation to detect and predict HSIL among HIV-positive and HIV-negative MSM.A total of 123 HIV-positive and 123 HIV-negative MSM were enrolled and followed for 12 months. High-resolution anoscopy (HRA) with biopsies were performed at every visit along with anal sample collection for cytology, high-risk HPV DNA genotyping, HPV E6/E7 mRNA, and p16 immunocytochemistry. Performance characteristics and area under the receiver operator characteristics curve were calculated for these biomarkers at baseline, and Cox regression compared the usefulness of these biomarkers in predicting incident HSIL. High-risk HPV DNA, E6/E7 mRNA, and p16 immunocytochemistry each identified 43-46% of MSM whose baseline test positivity would trigger HRA referral. E6/E7 mRNA had the highest sensitivity (64.7%) and correctly classified the highest number of prevalent HSIL cases. With the exception of p16 immunochemistry, most tests showed significant increases in sensitivity but decreases specificity versus anal cytology, while the overall number of correctly classified cases was not significantly different. Baseline or persistent type 16 and/or 18 HPV DNA was the only test significantly predicting incident histologic HSIL within 12 months in models adjusted for HIV status and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions at baseline.Countries with a high HIV prevalence among MSM and limited HRA resources may consider using biomarkers to identify individuals at high risk of HSIL. E6/E7 mRNA had the highest sensitivity for prevalent HSIL detection regardless of HIV status, whereas type 16 and/or 18 HPV DNA performed best in predicting development of incident HSIL within 12 months

    Prevalence of and risk factors for anal high-risk HPV among HIV-negative and HIV-positive MSM and transgender women in three countries at South-East Asia.

    No full text
    This study aimed to assess the prevalence of and associated risk factors for anal high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) infection among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) in Indonesia, Thailand, and Malaysia.This was baseline data from a prospective cohort study with clinic sites in Jakarta and Bali (Indonesia), Bangkok (Thailand), and Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia).MSM and TGW aged 18 years and older from Indonesia, Thailand, and Malaysia were enrolled. Demographic and behavioral characteristics were assessed, and anal samples were collected for HPV genotyping. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess risk factors for anal hr-HPV overall and among HIV-positive participants.A total of 392 participants were enrolled, and 48 were TGW. As many as 245 were HIV-positive, and 78.0% of the participants were on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). Median CD4 count was 439 cells/mm and 68.2% had undetectable HIV-RNA. HIV-positive participants had significantly more hr-HPV compared to HIV-negative participants (76.6% vs 53.5%, P < .001). HPV-16 was the most common high-risk type (20%), whereas HPV-33, -39, and -58 were significantly more common among HIV-positive participants. HIV-positive participant significantly associated with anal hr-HPV infection compared with HIV-negative (OR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.76-4.70, P ≤ .001), whereas among HIV-positive participants transgender identity had lower prevalence of hr-HPV infection (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.19-0.91, P = .03).High-risk HPV infection was very common among MSM and TGW in South-East Asia. Overall, HIV-infection, regardless of cART use and immune status, significantly increased the risk, while among HIV-positive participants transgender identity seemed to decrease the risk of anal hr-HPV

    Baseline positive and persistent positive biomarkers predicting incident anal histologic HSIL at subsequent visits among those who were free of disease at baseline.

    No full text
    <p>HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HPV, human papillomavirus; CI, confidence interval.</p><p>HSIL included anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) 2 or AIN 3 on histology.</p>a<p>High-risk HPV DNA included HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, and 68.</p>b<p>E6/E7 mRNA positivity was defined as greater than or equal to 2% of cells which had E6/E7 mRNA over-expression in the sample.</p>c<p>p16 immunocytochemistry was considered positive if there was a presence of cells with cytoplasmic and/or nuclear staining.</p>d<p>Multivariate model adjusted for HIV status and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion at baseline.</p

    Baseline positivity of anal cytology and biomarkers by histologic anal diagnosis.

    No full text
    <p>P values correspond to a comparison of the proportion of subjects with no SIL or LSIL versus those with HSIL, who were identified by each biomarker.</p><p>SIL, squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HPV, human papillomavirus.</p><p>LSIL group included MSM with anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) 1 on histology. HSIL group included MSM with AIN 2 or AIN 3 on histology. No SIL group included MSM without LSIL or HSIL.</p

    Performance characteristics of anal cytology, high-risk HPV DNA, HPV E6/E7 mRNA, and p16 immunocytochemistry to detect anal histologic HSIL at baseline, by HIV status.

    No full text
    <p>HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; AROC, area under the receiver operator characteristics curve; HPV, human papillomavirus.</p><p>HSIL included anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) 2 or AIN 3 on histology.</p>a<p>High-risk HPV DNA included HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, and 68.</p>b<p>E6/E7 mRNA positivity was defined as greater than or equal to 2% of cells which had E6/E7 mRNA over-expression in the sample.</p>c<p>p16 immunocytochemistry was considered positive if there was a presence of cells with cytoplasmic and/or nuclear staining.</p>d<p>*P≤0.05 and ‡ P≤0.001 in pairwise comparisons against anal cytology, in subjects with HSIL for sensitivity and subjects without HSIL for specificity.</p>e<p>P values for pairwise comparisons of the AROC relative to anal cytology as a reference group.</p
    corecore