Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States

There are well-established disparities in cancer incidence and outcomes by race/ethnicity that result from the interplay between structural, socioeconomic, socio-environmental, behavioural and biological factors. However, large research studies designed to investigate factors contributing to cancer aetiology and progression have mainly focused on populations of European origin. The limitations in clinicopathological and genetic data, as well as the reduced availability of biospecimens from diverse populations, contribute to the knowledge gap and have the potential to widen cancer health disparities. In this review, we summarise reported disparities and associated factors in the United States of America (USA) for the most common cancers (breast, prostate, lung and colon), and for a subset of other cancers that highlight the complexity of disparities (gastric, liver, pancreas and leukaemia). We focus on populations commonly identified and referred to as racial/ethnic minorities in the USA—African Americans/Blacks, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians/other Pacific Islanders and Hispanics/Latinos. We conclude that even though substantial progress has been made in understanding the factors underlying cancer health disparities, marked inequities persist. Additional efforts are needed to include participants from diverse populations in the research of cancer aetiology, biology and treatment. Furthermore, to eliminate cancer health disparities, it will be necessary to facilitate access to, and utilisation of, health services to all individuals, and to address structural inequities, including racism, that disproportionally affect racial/ethnic minorities in the USA.Fil: Zavala, Valentina A.. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Bracci, Paige M.. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Carethers, John M.. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Carvajal Carmona, Luis. University of California at Davis; Estados UnidosFil: Coggins, Nicole B.. University of California at Davis; Estados UnidosFil: Cruz Correa, Marcia R.. Universidad de Puerto Rico; Puerto RicoFil: Davis, Melissa. No especifíca;Fil: de Smith, Adam J.. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Dutil, Julie. Ponce Research Institute; Puerto RicoFil: Figueiredo, Jane C.. Cedars Sinai Medical Center; Estados UnidosFil: Fox, Rena. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Graves, Kristi D.. University Of Georgetown; Estados UnidosFil: Gomez, Scarlett Lin. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Llera, Andrea Sabina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires. Fundación Instituto Leloir. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Neuhausen, Susan L.. No especifíca;Fil: Newman, Lisa. No especifíca;Fil: Nguyen, Tung. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Palmer, Julie R.. National Institutes of Health; Estados UnidosFil: Palmer, Nynikka R.. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Pérez Stable, Eliseo J.. National Institutes of Health; Estados UnidosFil: Piawah, Sorbarikor. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Rodriquez, Erik J.. National Institutes of Health; Estados UnidosFil: Sanabria Salas, María Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología; ColombiaFil: Schmit, Stephanie L.. University of Southern California; Estados UnidosFil: Serrano Gomez, Silvia J.. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología; ColombiaFil: Stern, Mariana Carla. University of Southern California; Estados UnidosFil: Weitzel, Jeffrey. No especifíca;Fil: Yang, Jun J.. St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital; Estados UnidosFil: Zabaleta, Jovanny. No especifíca;Fil: Ziv, Elad. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Fejerman, Laura. University of California; Estados Unido

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Prostate Cancer Survivors' Perceived Engagement in Treatment Decision-Making.

ObjectiveWe examined prostate cancer patients' perceived engagement in treatment decision-making and associated factors by race/ethnicity in a multiethnic sample.MethodWe identified patients through the California Cancer Registry. Patients completed a cross-sectional telephone interview in English, Spanish, Cantonese, or Mandarin. Multivariable logistic regression models, stratified by race/ethnicity, estimated the associations of patient demographic and health status characteristics on (1) doctor asked patient to help decide treatment plan and (2) patient and doctor worked out a treatment plan together.ResultsWe included 855 prostate cancer patients: African American (19%), Asian American (15%), Latino (24%), and White (42%). Asian American patients were less likely than White patients to report that their doctors asked them to help decide a treatment plan (OR = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.18-0.53) and that they worked out a treatment plan with their doctors (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.33-0.90). Language of interview was a significant contributing factor in stratified analysis for both outcomes.ConclusionAsian American prostate cancer patients reported less engagement in treatment decision-making, with Chinese language being a significant contributing factor. Future research should identify patient-centered strategies that effectively engage underserved patients and support healthcare providers in shared decision-making with multiethnic and multilingual patients

African American prostate cancer survivors’ treatment decision-making and quality of life

ObjectiveTo examine African-American prostate cancer (PCa) survivors' involvement in treatment decision-making (TDM), and examine the association between TDM and quality of life (QOL), using secondary data.MethodsAfrican-American PCa survivors (181) were recruited from the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry. Participants completed a cross-sectional survey that asked about their chosen cancer treatment, TDM factors, and PCa-specific QOL (using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite--EPIC). Multivariate analysis of covariance was conducted to determine the association between TDM and QOL, controlling for confounders.ResultsMost men reported being active (44.2%) or collaborative (38.1%) in TDM, while 14.4% preferred a passive role. Adjusting for marital status, education and treatment, passive patients reported somewhat better QOL compared to active patients in the following QOL domains: urinary summary (p=0.04), urinary function (p=0.01), and urinary incontinence (p=0.03).ConclusionMost African-American PCa survivors preferred to be, and were, actively or collaboratively involved in TDM. However, those who preferred a passive role reported better PCa-specific QOL for the urinary domain compared to others.Practice implicationsIt is important to assess patients' TDM preference. Patients' QOL may differ by their TDM role, such that active patients may be more bothered by treatment side effects than other patients

Defining and Measuring Adherence in Observational Studies Assessing Outcomes of Real-world Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT: Evidence-based guidelines for active surveillance (AS), a treatment option for men with low-risk prostate cancer, recommend regular follow-up at periodic intervals to monitor disease progression. However, gaps in monitoring can lead to delayed detection of cancer progression, leading to missed window of curability. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the extent to which real-world observational studies reported adherence to monitoring protocols among prostate cancer patients on AS. When reported, we sought to characterize definitions of adherence. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We systematically reviewed observational studies assessing outcomes of prostate cancer patients on AS, published before March 22, 2019 in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL. Adherence definitions were considered time-bound if they included a pre-specified time, and binary if adherence was assessed but did not specify a time interval. We assessed study quality using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Forty-five studies met our inclusion criteria. Eleven studies did not report any data on adherence to AS protocols. Twenty-five studies did not explicitly measure adherence, but provided relevant data (e.g. number of patients who received a repeat biopsy). Six studies reported adherence using a time-bound definition, while three studies used a binary definition. Twenty-three studies provided information on patients lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Most studies reporting outcomes of patients on AS did not measure or report adherence. When reported, adherence was often not time-specific. As some AS patients will benefit from maintaining a window of curability, clinical practices and future studies should track and report adherence and associated factors. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed real-world observational studies examining outcomes of prostate cancer patients on AS. Most studies did not clearly define or report adherence to monitoring protocols, which is important to consider for appropriate disease management

Rural cancer survivors’ health information needs post-treatment

ObjectiveThis study describes the most common cancer-related health information needs among rural cancer survivors and characteristics associated with reporting more information needs.MethodsRural breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors, two to five years post-diagnosis, identified from an institutional cancer registry, completed a mailed/telephone-administered survey. Respondents were asked about 23 health information needs in eight domains (tests and treatment, side effects and symptoms, health promotion, fertility, interpersonal, occupational, emotional, and insurance). Poisson regression models were used to assess relationships between number of health information needs and demographic and cancer characteristics.ResultsParticipants (n = 170) reported an average of four health information needs, with the most common domains being: side effects and symptoms (58 %), health promotion (54 %), and tests and treatment (41 %). Participants who were younger (compared to 5-year increase, rate ratio [RR] = 1.11, 95 % CI = 1.02-1.21), ethnic minority (RR = 1.89, 95 % CI = 1.17-3.06), less educated (RR = 1.49, 95 % CI = 1.00-2.23), and financially stressed (RR = 1.87, 95 % CI = 1.25-2.81) had a greater number of information needs.ConclusionsYounger, ethnic minority, less educated, and financially strained rural survivors have the greatest need for informational support.Practice implicationsThe provision of health information for rural cancer survivors should consider type of cancer, treatments received, and sociocultural differences to tailor information provided

Prostate cancer patients' self-reported participation in research: an examination of racial/ethnic disparities.

PurposeWe examined prostate cancer patients' participation in research and associated factors by race/ethnicity in a multiethnic sample.MethodsMen with a new diagnosis of prostate cancer were identified through the California Cancer Registry. Patients completed a cross-sectional telephone interview in English, Spanish, Cantonese or Mandarin. Multivariable logistic regression models, stratified by race/ethnicity, estimated the associations of patient demographic and health characteristics with participation in (1) any research, (2) behavioral research, and (3) biological/clinical research.ResultsWe included 855 prostate cancer patients: African American (19%), Asian American (15%), Latino (24%), and White (42%). In the overall model of participation in any research, African American men (Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.54, 95% CI 1.63-3.94), and those with two or more comorbidities (OR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.27-3.80) were more likely to report participation. Men 65 years old and older (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.91), those who were married or living with a partner (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.98), and those who completed the interview in Spanish (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.85) were less likely to report participating in any research. Stratified analyses identified racial/ethnic-specific sociodemographic characteristics associated with lower research participation, including Spanish or Chinese language, older age, and lower education.ConclusionAfrican American prostate cancer patients reported higher research participation than all other groups. However, recruitment efforts are still needed to overcome barriers to participation for Spanish and Chinese speakers, and barriers among older adults and those with lower education levels