Evaluation of disease-specific health-related quality of life in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

SummaryBackgroundPulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a debilitating and life-threatening disease despite improvements in hemodynamics, exercise capacity and survival with recent therapeutic advances. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has, therefore, been proposed as an important outcome for evaluating care. Relatively little, however, is known regarding HRQOL or its determinants in PAH. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire was recently adapted and validated for HRQOL measurement in PAH. We applied this pulmonary hypertension-specific version (MLHF-PH) to a larger population of PAH patients.MethodsNinety-three consecutive outpatients with PAH completed the MLHF-PH. Scores were assessed for correlations with demographics, symptoms, hemodynamics and treatments.ResultsPatients with PAH had significantly impaired HRQOL as assessed by the disease-specific MLHF-PH. Each physical and emotional component, as well as total scores on the MLHF-PH indicated severely depressed HRQOL. As compared to other diagnoses, PAH associated with scleroderma had the worst HRQOL. Patients with WHO functional Class II symptoms reported better HRQOL than Class III patients. Fatigue, weakness and abdominal discomfort were each associated with more severely depressed HRQOL, as was current epoprostenol use. With the sole exception of the right atrial pressure, hemodynamic measurements did not correlate with HRQOL scores. Simultaneous evaluation of HRQOL with a non-disease-specific questionnaire (SF-36) revealed a similarly impaired status, although identified fewer associations with patient-specific factors.ConclusionSeverely impaired HRQOL is present in this population of patients with PAH evaluated with a disease-specific questionnaire. The availability of a pulmonary hypertension-specific HRQOL questionnaire may enable further targeted investigations of factors that might improve outcomes

Race and sex differences in response to endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Background Recently studied therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have improved outcomes among populations of patients, but little is known about which patients are most likely to respond to specific treatments. Differences in endothelin-1 biology between sexes and between whites and blacks may lead to differences in patients' responses to treatment with endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs). Methods We conducted pooled analyses of deidentified, patient-level data from six randomized placebo-controlled trials of ERAs submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration to elucidate heterogeneity in treatment response. We estimated the interaction between treatment assignment (ERA vs placebo) and sex and between treatment and white or black race in terms of the change in 6-min walk distance from baseline to 12 weeks. Results Trials included 1,130 participants with a mean age of 49 years; 21% were men, 74% were white, and 6% were black. The placebo-adjusted response to ERAs was 29.7 m (95% CI, 3.7-55.7 m) greater in women than in men (P = .03). The placebo-adjusted response was 42.2 m for whites and −1.4 m for blacks, a difference of 43.6 m (95% CI, −3.5-90.7 m) (P = .07). Similar results were found in sensitivity analyses and in secondary analyses using the outcome of absolute distance walked. Conclusions Women with PAH obtain greater responses to ERAs than do men, and whites may experience a greater treatment benefit than do blacks. This heterogeneity in treatment-response may reflect pathophysiologic differences between sexes and races or distinct disease phenotypes

Effect of volume reduction on lung transplant timing and selection for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

AbstractBackground: End-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has traditionally been treated with lung transplantation. For 2 years, our lung transplantation program has placed patients with appropriate criteria for lung transplantation and volume reduction into a prospective management algorithm. These patients are offered the lung volume reduction option as a “bridge” to “extend” the eventual time to transplantation. We examine the results of this pilot program. Methods: From October 11, 1993, to April 17, 1997, 31 patients were evaluated for lung transplantation who also had physiologic criteria for volume reduction (forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≤ 25%; residual volume > 200%; significant ventilation/perfusion heterogeneity). All patients completed 6 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation and then had baseline pulmonary function and 6-minute walk tests. These patients were then offered volume reduction as a “bridge” and were simultaneously listed for transplantation. Postoperatively, these 31 patients were then divided into two groups: Those with satisfactory results at 4 to 6 months after volume reduction and those with unsatisfactory results. Volume reduction was performed through a video thoracic approach in 87% of the patients and bilateral median sternotomy in the remaining 13%. The condition of the patients was monitored after the operation with repeated pulmonary function tests and 6-minute walk tests at 3-month intervals. Results: Twenty-four of 31 patients (77.4%) had primary success (at 4 to 6 months) results after lung volume reduction and 7 patients (22.6%) had primary failure, including 1 patient who died in the perioperative period (3.2%). Four patients (16.7%) from the primary success cohort had significant deterioration in their pulmonary function during intermediate-term follow-up and were then reconsidered for lung transplantation. Two of them have subsequently undergone transplantation with good postoperative pulmonary function results. Interestingly, three patients had α1-antitrypsin deficiency; two had a poor outcome of lung volume reduction and primary failure. Conclusions: Lung volume reduction in these patients is safe. Seventy-seven percent of otherwise suitable candidates for lung transplantation achieved initial good results from volume reduction and were deactivated from the list (placed on status 7). Most patients entering our prospective management algorithm have either significantly delayed or completely avoided lung transplantation after volume reduction. Lung volume reduction has substantially affected the practice, timing, and selection of patients for lung transplantation. Our waiting list now has a reduced percentage of patients with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease compared with 3 years ago. Our experience suggests that lung volume reduction may be limited as a “bridge” in α1-antitrypsin deficiency. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:9-18

Prognostic Significance of Biomarkers in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Rationale: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare progressive disease of the pulmonary vasculature that is characterized by endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and right ventricular dysfunction. Objectives: The main objective was to determine whether endothelial, inflammatory, and cardiac biomarkers would be associated with the World Health Organization functional assessment and survival in patients with PAH. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with PAH enrolled in the Randomized Clinical Trial of Aspirin and Simvastatin for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (ASA-STAT). Biomarkers (N-terminal fragment of pro-BNP [NT-pro-BNP], von Willebrand factor [vWF], soluble P selectin, C-reactive protein, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, tumor necrosis factor, IL-6, β-thromboglobulin, and thromboxane B2) were measured at baseline. Patients from the study were followed until lung transplantation, death, or August 1, 2013. Ordinal logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were performed. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty-five patients with PAH were enrolled. The mean age was 51 years, and 86% were women. Higher vWF activity, lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and higher thromboxane B2 levels were associated with worse World Health Organization functional class after adjustment for age, sex, and etiology of PAH. Higher NT-pro-BNP levels, lower vWF activity, and lower total cholesterol were associated with an increased risk of death or lung transplant after adjustment for age, sex, etiology of PAH, and 6-minute-walk distance. Conclusions: In patients with PAH, lower vWF activity and cholesterol levels and higher NT-pro-BNP levels at baseline were associated with an increased risk of death or transplantation. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00384865)

Randomized Clinical Trial of Aspirin and Simvastatin for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Background—Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease that causes exercise limitation, heart failure, and death. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of aspirin and simvastatin in PAH. Methods and Results—We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2×2 factorial clinical trial of aspirin and simvastatin in patients with PAH receiving background therapy at 4 centers. A total of 92 patients with PAH were to be randomized to aspirin 81 mg or matching placebo and simvastatin 40 mg or matching placebo. The primary outcome was 6-minute walk distance at 6 months. Sixty-five subjects had been randomized when the trial was terminated by the Data Safety and Monitoring Board after an interim analysis showed futility in reaching the primary end point for simvastatin. After adjustment for baseline 6-minute walk distance, there was no significant difference in the 6-minute walk distance at 6 months between aspirin (n=32) and placebo (n=33; placebo-corrected difference −0.5 m, 95% confidence interval −28.4 to 27.4 m; P=0.97) or between simvastatin (n=32) and placebo (n=33; placebo-corrected difference −27.6 m, 95% confidence interval −59.6 to 4.3 m; P=0.09). There tended to be more major bleeding episodes with aspirin than with placebo (4 events versus 1 event, respectively; P=0.17). Conclusions—Neither aspirin nor simvastatin had a significant effect on the 6-minute walk distance, although patients randomized to simvastatin tended to have a lower 6-minute walk distance at 6 months. These results do not support the routine treatment of patients with PAH with these medications

Recommendations for the clinical management of patients receiving macitentan for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH): A Delphi consensus document

In patients treated with macitentan (Opsumit®, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), prevention and/or effective management of treatment-related adverse events may improve adherence. However, management of these adverse events can be challenging and the base of evidence and clinical experience for macitentan is limited. In the absence of evidence, consensus recommendations from physicians experienced in using macitentan to treat PAH may benefit patients and physicians who are using macitentan. Consensus recommendations were developed by a panel of physicians experienced with macitentan and PAH using a modified Delphi process. Over three iterations, panelists developed and refined a series of statements on the use of macitentan in PAH and rated their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale. The panel of 18 physicians participated and developed a total of 118 statements on special populations, add-on therapy, drug-drug interactions, warnings and precautions, hospitalization and functional class, and adverse event management. The resulting consensus recommendations are intended to provide practical guidance on real-world issues in using macitentan to treat patients with PAH

Symptom Phenotypes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: The PAH “Symptome”

Women with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) experience multiple symptoms, including dyspnea, fatigue, and sleep disturbance, that impair their health‐related quality of life (HRQOL). However, we know little about phenotypic subgroups of patients with PAH with similar, concurrent, multiple symptoms. The objectives of this study were to define the “symptome” by symptom cluster phenotypes and compare characteristics such as biomarkers, cardiac structure and function (echocardiography), functional capacity (6‐min walk distance), and HRQOL between the groups. This cross‐sectional study included 60 women with PAH. Subjects completed an assessment battery: Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Symptom Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile, Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Physical Function, PROMIS® Sleep‐Related Impairment, and the emPHasis‐10. Subjects also underwent transthoracic echocardiography, phlebotomy, 6‐min walk distance, and actigraphy. The three symptoms of dyspnea, fatigue, and sleep disturbance were used to define the symptom clusters. Other PAH symptoms, plasma and serum biomarkers, cardiac structure and function (echocardiography), exercise capacity (6‐min walk distance), sleep (actigraphy), and HRQOL were compared across phenotypes. The mean age was 50 ± 18 years, 51% were non‐ Hispanic white, 32% were non‐Hispanic Black and 40% had idiopathic PAH. Cluster analysis identified Mild (n = 28, 47%), Moderate (n = 20, 33%), and Severe Symptom Cluster Phenotypes (n = 12, 20%). There were no differences for age, race, or PAH etiology between the phenotypes. WHO functional class (p \u3c 0.001), norepinephrine levels (p = 0.029), right atrial pressure (p = 0.001), physical function (p \u3c 0.001), sleep onset latency (p = 0.040), and HRQOL (p \u3c 0.001) all differed significantly across phenotypes. We identified three distinctive symptom cluster phenotypes (Mild, Moderate, and Severe) for women with PAH that also differed by PAH‐related symptoms, physical function, right atrial pressure, norepinephrine levels, and HRQOL. These phenotypes could suggest targeted interventions to improve symptoms and HRQOL in those most severely affected

Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: report of a Kidney Disease:Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference

The worldwide burden of kidney disease is rising, but public awareness remains limited, underscoring the need for more effective communication by stakeholders in the kidney health community. Despite this need for clarity, the nomenclature for describing kidney function and disease lacks uniformity. In June 2019, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) convened a Consensus Conference with the goal of standardizing and refining the nomenclature used in the English language to describe kidney function and disease, and of developing a glossary that could be used in scientific publications. Guiding principles of the conference were that the revised nomenclature should be patient-centered, precise, and consistent with nomenclature used in the KDIGO guidelines. Conference attendees reached general consensus on the following recommendations: (i) to use "kidney" rather than "renal" or "nephro-" when referring to kidney disease and kidney function; (ii) to use "kidney failure" with appropriate descriptions of presence or absence of symptoms, signs, and treatment, rather than "end-stage kidney disease"; (iii) to use the KDIGO definition and classification of acute kidney diseases and disorders (AKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI), rather than alternative descriptions, to define and classify severity of AKD and AKI; (iv) to use the KDIGO definition and classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) rather than alternative descriptions to define and classify severity of CKD; and (v) to use specific kidney measures, such as albuminuria or decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR), rather than "abnormal" or "reduced" kidney function to describe alterations in kidney structure and function. A proposed 5-part glossary contains specific items for which there was general agreement. Conference attendees acknowledged limitations of the recommendations and glossary, but they considered standardization of scientific nomenclature to be essential for improving communication