6 research outputs found

    Enhancing teak (Tectona grandis) seedling growth by rhizosphere microbes: a sustainable way to optimize agroforestry

    Get PDF
    With its premium wood quality and resistance to pests, teak is a valuable tree species remarkably required for timber trading and agroforestry. The nursery stage of teak plantation needs critical care to warrant its long-term productivity. This study aimed to search for beneficial teak rhizosphere microbes and assess their teak-growth-promoting potentials during nursery stock preparation. Three teak rhizosphere/root-associated microbes, including two teak rhizobacteria (a nitrogen-fixing teak root endophyte-Agrobacterium sp. CGC-5 and a teak rhizosphere actinobacterium-Kitasatospora sp. TCM1-050) and an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Claroideoglomus sp. PBT03), were isolated and used in this study. Both teak rhizobacteria could produce in vitro phytohormones (auxins) and catalase. With the pot-scale assessments, applying these rhizosphere microbes in the form of consortia offered better teak-growth-promoting activities than the individual applications, supported by significantly increased teak seedling biomass. Moreover, teak-growth-promoting roles of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus were highly dependent upon the support by other teak rhizobacteria. Based on our findings, establishing the synergistic interactions between beneficial rhizosphere microbes and teak roots was a promising sustainable strategy to enhance teak growth and development at the nursery stage and reduce chemical inputs in agroforestry

    Characterization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus communities of Aquilaria crassna and Tectona grandis roots and soils in Thailand plantations

    Get PDF
    Aquilaria crassna Pierre ex Lec. and Tectona grandis Linn.f. are sources of resin-suffused agarwood and teak timber, respectively. This study investigated arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus community structure in roots and rhizosphere soils of A. crassna and T. grandis from plantations in Thailand to understand whether AM fungal communities present in roots and rhizosphere soils vary with host plant species and study sites. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism complemented with clone libraries revealed that AM fungal community composition in A. crassna and T. grandis were similar. A total of 38 distinct terminal restriction fragments (TRFs) were found, 31 of which were shared between A. crassna and T. grandis. AM fungal communities in T. grandis samples from different sites were similar, as were those in A. crassna. The estimated average minimum numbers of AM fungal taxa per sample in roots and soils of T. grandis were at least 1.89 vs. 2.55, respectively, and those of A. crassna were 2.85 vs. 2.33 respectively. The TRFs were attributed to Claroideoglomeraceae, Diversisporaceae, Gigasporaceae and Glomeraceae. The Glomeraceae were found to be common in all study sites. Specific AM taxa in roots and soils of T. grandis and A. crassna were not affected by host plant species and sample source (root vs. soil) but affected by collecting site. Future inoculum production and utilization efforts can be directed toward the identified symbiotic associates of these valuable tree species to enhance reforestation efforts

    Occurrence of TRFs from roots and soils in (a) <i>Tectona grandis</i> and (b) <i>Aquilaria crassna</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Bars indicate the proportion of samples that yielded each TRF; dots indicate the average intensity of that fragment (± SEM) in those samples. The letters indicate the restriction enzyme involved in each fragment size, a: <i>MboI</i>, b: <i>HinfI</i> and c: <i>Hsp92II</i>.</p

    Neighbour-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree of partial small subunit rRNA gene.

    No full text
    <p>Phylogeny was constructed using the region from NS31 to AML3. The percentage support values are based on 1000 bootstraps.</p

    Chemical characteristic of soils (mean value ± SEM) in wet season (July 2010) which soils and roots were sampled.

    No full text
    a<p>Means of three observations. Means in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (α = 0.05).</p><p>Chemical characteristic of soils (mean value ± SEM) in wet season (July 2010) which soils and roots were sampled.</p
    corecore