Comparability of Raman Spectroscopic Configurations: A Large Scale Cross-Laboratory Study

This is the final version. Available on open access from the American Chemical Society via the DOI in this recordThe variable configuration of Raman spectroscopic platforms is one of the major obstacles in establishing Raman spectroscopy as a valuable physicochemical method within real-world scenarios such as clinical diagnostics. For such real world applications like diagnostic classification, the models should ideally be usable to predict data from different setups. Whether it is done by training a rugged model with data from many setups or by a primary-replica strategy where models are developed on a 'primary' setup and the test data are generated on 'replicate' setups, this is only possible if the Raman spectra from different setups are consistent, reproducible, and comparable. However, Raman spectra can be highly sensitive to the measurement conditions, and they change from setup to setup even if the same samples are measured. Although increasingly recognized as an issue, the dependence of the Raman spectra on the instrumental configuration is far from being fully understood and great effort is needed to address the resulting spectral variations and to correct for them. To make the severity of the situation clear, we present a round robin experiment investigating the comparability of 35 Raman spectroscopic devices with different configurations in 15 institutes within seven European countries from the COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) action Raman4clinics. The experiment was developed in a fashion that allows various instrumental configurations ranging from highly confocal setups to fibre-optic based systems with different excitation wavelengths. We illustrate the spectral variations caused by the instrumental configurations from the perspectives of peak shifts, intensity variations, peak widths, and noise levels. We conclude this contribution with recommendations that may help to improve the inter-laboratory studies.COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)Portuguese Foundation for Science and TechnologyNational Research Fund of Luxembourg (FNR)China Scholarship Council (CSC)BOKU Core Facilities Multiscale ImagingDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation

Intracranial EEG Validation of Single-Channel Subgaleal EEG for Seizure Identification.

PURPOSE:A device that provides continuous, long-term, accurate seizure detection information to providers and patients could fundamentally alter epilepsy care. Subgaleal (SG) EEG is a promising modality that offers a minimally invasive, safe, and accurate means of long-term seizure monitoring. METHODS:Subgaleal EEG electrodes were placed, at or near the cranial vertex, simultaneously with intracranial EEG electrodes in 21 epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial EEG studies for up to 13 days. A total of 219, 10-minute single-channel SGEEG samples, including 138 interictal awake or sleep segments and 81 seizures (36 temporal lobe, 32 extra-temporal, and 13 simultaneous temporal/extra-emporal onsets) were reviewed by 3 expert readers blinded to the intracranial EEG results, then analyzed for accuracy and interrater reliability. RESULTS:Using a single-channel of SGEEG, reviewers accurately identified 98% of temporal and extratemporal onset, intracranial, EEG-verified seizures with a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 99%. All focal to bilateral tonic--clonic seizures were correctly identified. CONCLUSIONS:Single-channel SGEEG, placed at or near the vertex, reliably identifies focal and secondarily generalized seizures. These findings demonstrate that the SG space at the cranial vertex may be an appropriate site for long-term ambulatory seizure monitoring

Intracranial EEG Validation of Single-Channel Subgaleal EEG for Seizure Identification

PURPOSE:A device that provides continuous, long-term, accurate seizure detection information to providers and patients could fundamentally alter epilepsy care. Subgaleal (SG) EEG is a promising modality that offers a minimally invasive, safe, and accurate means of long-term seizure monitoring. METHODS:Subgaleal EEG electrodes were placed, at or near the cranial vertex, simultaneously with intracranial EEG electrodes in 21 epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial EEG studies for up to 13 days. A total of 219, 10-minute single-channel SGEEG samples, including 138 interictal awake or sleep segments and 81 seizures (36 temporal lobe, 32 extra-temporal, and 13 simultaneous temporal/extra-emporal onsets) were reviewed by 3 expert readers blinded to the intracranial EEG results, then analyzed for accuracy and interrater reliability. RESULTS:Using a single-channel of SGEEG, reviewers accurately identified 98% of temporal and extratemporal onset, intracranial, EEG-verified seizures with a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 99%. All focal to bilateral tonic--clonic seizures were correctly identified. CONCLUSIONS:Single-channel SGEEG, placed at or near the vertex, reliably identifies focal and secondarily generalized seizures. These findings demonstrate that the SG space at the cranial vertex may be an appropriate site for long-term ambulatory seizure monitoring

COVID-19 Severity and Stroke: Correlation of Imaging and Laboratory Markers.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) appears to be an independent risk factor for stroke. We hypothesize that patients who develop stroke while hospitalized for severe COVID-19 will have higher inflammatory markers and distinct stroke imaging patterns compared with patients positive for COVID-19 with out-of-hospital stroke onset and milder or no COVID-19 symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS:This is a retrospective case series of patients positive for COVID-19 on polymerase chain reaction testing with imaging-confirmed stroke treated within a large health care network in New York City and Long Island between March 14 and April 26, 2020. Clinical and laboratory data collected retrospectively included complete blood counts and creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, ferritin, and D-dimer levels. All CT and MR imaging studies were independently reviewed by 2 neuroradiologists who recorded stroke subtype and patterns of infarction and intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS:Compared with patients with COVID-19 with outside-of-hospital stroke onset and milder or no COVID-19 symptoms (n = 45, 52.3%), patients with stroke already hospitalized for severe COVID-19 (n = 41, 47.7%) had significantly more frequent infarctions (95.1% versus 73.3%, P = .006), with multivascular distributions (56.4% versus 33.3%, P = .022) and associated hemorrhage (31.7% versus 4.4%, P = .001). Patients with stroke admitted with more severe COVID-19 had significantly higher C-reactive protein and ferritin levels, elevated D-dimer levels, and more frequent lymphopenia and renal and hepatic injury (all, P \u3c .003). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with stroke hospitalized with severe COVID-19 are characterized by higher inflammatory, coagulopathy, and tissue-damage biomarkers, supporting proposed pathogenic mechanisms of hyperinflammation activating a prothrombotic state. Cautious balancing of thrombosis and the risk of hemorrhagic transformation is warranted when considering anticoagulation

Comparability of Raman Spectroscopic Configurations: A Large Scale Cross-Laboratory Study

The variable configuration of Raman spectroscopic platforms is one of the major obstacles in establishing Raman spectroscopy as a valuable physicochemical method within real-world scenarios such as clinical diagnostics. For such real world applications like diagnostic classification, the models should ideally be usable to predict data from different setups. Whether it is done by training a rugged model with data from many setups or by a primary-replica strategy where models are developed on a 'primary' setup and the test data are generated on 'replicate' setups, this is only possible if the Raman spectra from different setups are consistent, reproducible, and comparable. However, Raman spectra can be highly sensitive to the measurement conditions, and they change from setup to setup even if the same samples are measured. Although increasingly recognized as an issue, the dependence of the Raman spectra on the instrumental configuration is far from being fully understood and great effort is needed to address the resulting spectral variations and to correct for them. To make the severity of the situation clear, we present a round robin experiment investigating the comparability of 35 Raman spectroscopic devices with different configurations in 15 institutes within seven European countries from the COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) action Raman4clinics. The experiment was developed in a fashion that allows various instrumental configurations ranging from highly confocal setups to fibre-optic based systems with different excitation wavelengths. We illustrate the spectral variations caused by the instrumental configurations from the perspectives of peak shifts, intensity variations, peak widths, and noise levels. We conclude this contribution with recommendations that may help to improve the inter-laboratory studies. © 2020 American Chemical Society