8 research outputs found
Immunological Monitoring of Renal Transplant Recipients to Predict Acute Allograft Rejection Following the Discontinuation of Tacrolimus
Contains fulltext :
69863.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Transplant patients would benefit from reduction of immunosuppression providing that graft rejection is prevented. We have evaluated a number of immunological markers in blood of patients in whom tacrolimus was withdrawn after renal transplantation. The alloreactive precursor frequency of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, the frequency of T cell subsets and the functional capacity of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) were analyzed before transplantation and before tacrolimus reduction. In a case-control design, the results were compared between patients with (n = 15) and without (n = 28) acute rejection after tacrolimus withdrawal. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Prior to tacrolimus reduction, the ratio between memory CD8+ T cells and Treg was higher in rejectors compared to non-rejectors. Rejectors also had a higher ratio between memory CD4+ T cells and Treg, and ratios <20 were only observed in non-rejectors. Between the time of transplantation and the start of tacrolimus withdrawal, an increase in naive T cell frequencies and a reciprocal decrease of effector T cell percentages was observed in rejectors. The proportion of Treg within the CD4+ T cells decreased after transplantation, but anti-donor regulatory capacity of Treg remained unaltered in rejectors and non-rejectors. CONCLUSIONS: Immunological monitoring revealed an association between acute rejection following the withdrawal of tacrolimus and 1) the ratio of memory T cells and Treg prior to the start of tacrolimus reduction, and 2) changes in the distribution of naive, effector and memory T cells over time. Combination of these two biomarkers allowed highly specific identification of patients in whom immunosuppression could be safely reduced
Mycophenolic acid trough level monitoring in solid organ transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil: association with clinical outcome
Steroid-withdrawal at 3 days after renal transplantation with anti-IL-2 receptor alpha therapy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
Contains fulltext :
58019.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)Steroids have been included in most immunosuppressive regimens after renal transplantation, but are feared for their side-effects. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to investigate whether it is feasible to withdraw steroids early after transplantation with the use of anti-IL-2Ralpha induction, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). A total of 364 patients were randomized to receive either two doses of daclizumab (1 mg/kg) and, for the first 3 days, 100 mg of prednisolone (daclizumab group n = 186), or steroids (tapered to 0 mg at week 16; controls n = 178). All patients received tacrolimus and MMF. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months was not different between the daclizumab group (15%) and the controls (14%) (95% confidence interval of difference: -6 to + 8%, NS). Graft survival at 12 months was comparable in the two groups (daclizumab group: 91%; controls: 90%). Mean arterial blood pressure, serum lipids, and incidence of patients with hyperglycemia were temporary lower in the daclizumab group compared with controls. The immunosuppressive regimen of the daclizumab group was associated with increased costs. In conclusion, with the use of anti-IL-2Ra induction and daily therapy with tacrolimus and MMF it is feasible to withdraw steroids at 3 days after renal transplantation
Leucodepletion leads to component-like storage stability of whole blood - suggesting its homologous use?
Cyclosporine levels and rate of graft rejection following non-myeloablative conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT
Hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) after non-myeloablative conditioning is associated with reduced TRM, and increased risk of graft rejection. Although preclinical data have shown the importance of post transplant immunosuppression in achieving engraftment, little is known about the role of CSA in the clinical setting of non-myeloablative transplantation. In a retrospective analysis of patients treated with allogeneic HSCT after fludarabine and 2?Gy TBI, 15 of 77 evaluable patients (20%) experienced primary (n=2) or secondary graft rejection at a median of 66 days post transplant. Mean day 1-28 CSA trough levels were inversely associated with day 28 chimerism (median 99, 85 and 70% for mean CSA >300, 300-600 and 300?ng/mL), 26% (300-600?ng/mL) and 50% (<600?ng/mL, P=0.005) of patients. The detrimental effect of high CSA levels on engraftment was confirmed in multivariable models and was found to operate comparably in sibling and unrelated donor transplants. Impairment of donor T-cell function by high serum levels of CSA might account for this finding, which should be verified in a larger patient group to better understand the role of CSA in non-myeloablative transplantation