31 research outputs found

    Practical guidelines for rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection

    Get PDF
    The potential for ischemic preconditioning to reduce infarct size was first recognized more than 30 years ago. Despite extension of the concept to ischemic postconditioning and remote ischemic conditioning and literally thousands of experimental studies in various species and models which identified a multitude of signaling steps, so far there is only a single and very recent study, which has unequivocally translated cardioprotection to improved clinical outcome as the primary endpoint in patients. Many potential reasons for this disappointing lack of clinical translation of cardioprotection have been proposed, including lack of rigor and reproducibility in preclinical studies, and poor design and conduct of clinical trials. There is, however, universal agreement that robust preclinical data are a mandatory prerequisite to initiate a meaningful clinical trial. In this context, it is disconcerting that the CAESAR consortium (Consortium for preclinicAl assESsment of cARdioprotective therapies) in a highly standardized multi-center approach of preclinical studies identified only ischemic preconditioning, but not nitrite or sildenafil, when given as adjunct to reperfusion, to reduce infarct size. However, ischemic preconditioning—due to its very nature—can only be used in elective interventions, and not in acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, better strategies to identify robust and reproducible strategies of cardioprotection, which can subsequently be tested in clinical trials must be developed. We refer to the recent guidelines for experimental models of myocardial ischemia and infarction, and aim to provide now practical guidelines to ensure rigor and reproducibility in preclinical and clinical studies on cardioprotection. In line with the above guideline, we define rigor as standardized state-of-the-art design, conduct and reporting of a study, which is then a prerequisite for reproducibility, i.e. replication of results by another laboratory when performing exactly the same experiment

    Determination of membrane protein glycation in diabetic tissue

    No full text
    Diabetes-associated hyperglycemia causes glycation of proteins at reactive amino groups, which can adversely affect protein function Although the effects of glycation on soluble proteins are well characterized, there is no information regarding membrane-associated proteins, mainly because of the lack of reproducible methods to determine protein glycation in vivo. The current study was conducted to establish such a method and to compare the glycation levels of membrane-associated proteins derived from normal and diabetic tissue. We present a detailed sample preparation protocol based on the borohydride-periodate assay, modified to allow manipulation of animal tissue. Assay noise associated with extraction protocols and nonproteinaceous buffer components was eliminated by the using 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) as a membrane detergent, applying desalting columns, and including a protein precipitation step. The glycation level of membrane proteins from diabetic rats is elevated to 4.89 nmol/mg protein (standard deviation [SD] 0.48) compared with normoglycemic control tissue (2.23 nmol/mg protein, SD 0.64). This result is consistent with and correlated to the total glycated hemoglobin levels in diabetic and normoglycemic rats. Using<100 μg protein, the described methods allow further study of protein glycation effects on the function of individual transporter proteins and the role of these modifications in diabetes
    corecore