Impacts of cover crops and crop residues on phosphorus losses in cold climates: a review

Non-Peer ReviewedThe use of plants in riparian buffers or cover crops is widely proposed as a strategy to mitigate sediment and nutrient losses from land to water. In cold climates, concerns may arise with regard to potentially elevated phosphorus (P) losses associated with freeze-thaw of plant materials. Here, we review the impacts of cover crops and crop residues on P loss in cold climates, and explore linkages between water extractable P in the plant materials and P loss in surface runoff and subsurface drainage from cropped soils. Water extractable P in plants is greatly affected by crop species and hardiness, as well as freezing regimes including both freezing temperature and the number of freeze-thaw cycles. Although controls on water extractable P in plant tissues and residues are relatively well understood, impacts on P runoff and leaching are inconsistent across studies due to the influences of soil, climate, and management factors. This review sheds light on improving winter crop cover management to minimize P losses from land to water in cold climates and points to future research needs. Specifically, more research is needed to understand interactions between soil, plant, hydrology, and management in influencing P loss, and to improve the assessment of crop contributions to P loss in field settings of cold climates. Further, the trade-offs between the concern over P and the control of sediment loss and nitrogen leaching should be acknowledged, as should the uncertainties of freezing and crop adaptability under future climate regimes

The latitudes, attitudes, and platitudes of watershed phosphorus management in North America

Phosphorus (P) plays a crucial role in agriculture as a primary fertilizer nutrient—and as a cause of the eutrophication of surface waters. Despite decades of efforts to keep P on agricultural fields and reduce losses to waterways, frequent algal blooms persist, triggering not only ecological disruption but also economic, social, and political consequences. We investigate historical and persistent factors affecting agricultural P mitigation in a transect of major watersheds across North America: Lake Winnipeg, Lake Erie, the Chesapeake Bay, and Lake Okeechobee/Everglades. These water bodies span 26 degrees of latitude, from the cold climate of central Canada to the subtropics of the southeastern United States. These water bodies and their associated watersheds have tracked trajectories of P mitigation that manifest remarkable similarities, and all have faced challenges in the application of science to agricultural management that continue to this day. An evolution of knowledge and experience in watershed P mitigation calls into question uniform solutions as well as efforts to transfer strategies from other arenas. As a result, there is a need to admit to shortcomings of past approaches, plotting a future for watershed P mitigation that accepts the sometimes two-sided nature of Hennig Brandt’s “Devil’s Element.

A Global Perspective on Phosphorus Management Decision Support in Agriculture: Lessons Learned and Future Directions

201