The Impact of Socioeconomic Status, Surgical Resection and Type of Hospital on Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer:A Population-Based Study in The Netherlands

The influence of socioeconomic inequalities in pancreatic cancer patients and especially its effect in patients who had a resection is not known. Hospital type in which resection is performed might also influence outcome. Patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer from 1989 to 2011 (n = 34,757) were selected from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Postal code was used to determine SES. Multivariable survival analyses using Cox regression were conducted to discriminate independent risk factors for death. Patients living in a high SES neighborhood more often underwent resection and more often were operated in a university hospital. After adjustment for clinicopathological factors, risk of dying was increased independently for patients with intermediate and low SES compared to patients with high SES. After resection, no survival difference was found among patients in the three SES groups. However, survival was better for patients treated in university hospitals compared to patients treated in non-university hospitals. Low SES was an independent risk factor for poor survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. SES was not an adverse risk factor after resection. Resection in non-university hospitals was associated with a worse prognosis.</p

Giant Cell Arteritis and COVID-19: Similarities and Discriminators. A Systematic Literature Review

OBJECTIVE: To identify shared and distinct features of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to reduce diagnostic error that could cause delays in correct treatment. METHODS: Two systematic literature reviews determined the frequency of clinical features of GCA and COVID-19 in published reports. Frequencies in each disease were summarised using median and range. RESULTS: Headache was common in GCA but was also observed in COVID-19 (66% for GCA, 10% for COVID-19). Jaw claudication or visual loss (43% and 26% in GCA, respectively) were not reported in COVID-19. Both diseases featured fatigue (38% for GCA, 43% for COVID-19) and elevated inflammatory markers (CRP elevated in 100% of GCA, 66% of COVID-19), but platelet count was elevated in 47% of GCA but 4% of COVID-19. Cough and fever were commonly reported in COVID-19 and less frequently in GCA (cough, 63% for COVID-19 versus 12% for GCA; fever, 83% for COVID-19 versus 27% for GCA). Gastrointestinal upset was occasionally reported in COVID-19 (8%), rarely in GCA (4%). Lymphopenia was more common in COVID-19 than GCA (53% in COVID-19, 2% in GCA). Alteration of smell and taste been described in GCA but their frequency is unclear. CONCLUSION: Overlapping features of GCA and COVID-19 include headache, fever, elevated CRP and cough. Jaw claudication, visual loss, platelet count and lymphocyte count may be more discriminatory. Physicians should be aware of the possibility of diagnostic confusion. We have designed a simple checklist to aid evidence-based evaluation of patients with suspected GCA

Clinical pathways for patients with giant cell arteritis during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international perspective

Giant cell arteritis, a common primary systemic vasculitis affecting older people, presents acutely as a medical emergency and requires rapid specialist assessment and treatment to prevent irreversible vision loss. Disruption of the health-care system caused by the COVID-19 pandemic exposed weak points in clinical pathways for diagnosis and treatment of giant cell arteritis, but has also permitted innovative solutions. The essential roles played by all professionals, including general practitioners and surgeons, in treating these patients have become evident. Patients must also be involved in the reshaping of clinical services. As an international group of authors involved in the care of patients with giant cell arteritis, we reflect in this Viewpoint on rapid service adaptations during the first peak of COVID-19, evaluate challenges, and consider implications for the future

Myocardial work, an echocardiographic measure of post myocardial infarct scar on contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance

This study investigates the relation of non-invasive myocardial work and myocardial viability following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) assessed on late gadolinium contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE CMR) and characterizes the remote zone using non-invasive myocardial work parameters. STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included. Several non-invasive myocardial work parameters were derived from speckle tracking strain echocardiography and sphygmomanometric blood pressure, e.g.: myocardial work index (MWI), constructive work (CW), wasted work (WW) and myocardial work efficiency (MWE). LGE was quantified to determine infarct transmurality and scar burden. The core zone was defined as the segment with the largest extent of transmural LGE and the remote zone as the diametrically opposed segment without LGE. A total of 53 patients (89% male, mean age 58 +/- 9 years) and 689 segments were analyzed. The mean scar burden was 14 +/- 7% of the total LV mass, and 76 segments (11%) demonstrated transmural hyperenhancement, 280 (41%) non-transmural hyperenhancement and 333 (48%) no LGE. An inverse relation was observed between segmental MWI, CW and MWE and infarct transmurality (p < 0.05). MWI, CW and MWE were significantly lower in the core zone compared to the remote zone (p<0.05). In conclusion, non-invasive myocardial work parameters may serve as potential markers of segmental myocardial viability in post-STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI. Non-invasive myocardial work can also be utilized to characterize the remote zone, which is an emerging prognostic marker as well as a therapeutic target. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.Cardiovascular Aspects of Radiolog