Disorders of Consciousness

Disorders of Consciousness are a big challenge for the entire process of rehabilitation: assessment, diagnosis, pharmacological, and rehabilitation programs, including conventional treatments and the use of new technologies

Long-term results of an intensive cognitive behavioral pain management program for patients with chronic low back pain: a concise report of an extended cohort with a minimum of 5-year follow-up

Contains fulltext : 206215.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Recovery of TES-MEPs During Surgical Decompression of the Spine: A Case Series of Eight Patients

Purpose: This study aimed to illustrate the recovery of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials during surgical decompression of the spinal cord in patients with impaired motor function preoperatively. Specific attention was paid to the duration of neurologic symptoms before surgery and the postoperative clinical recovery. Methods: A case series of eight patients was selected from a cohort of 74 patients that underwent spine surgery. The selected patients initially had low or absent transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials followed by a significant increase after surgical decompression of the spinal cord. Results: A significant intraoperative increase in amplitude of motor evoked potentials was detected after decompression of the spinal cord or cauda equina in patients suffering from spinal canal stenosis (n = 2), extradural meningioma (n = 3), or a herniated nucleus polposus (n = 3). This was related to an enhanced neurologic outcome only if patients (n = 6) had a short onset (less than = year) of neurologic impairment before surgery. Conclusions: In patients with a short onset of neurologic impairment because of compression of the spinal cord or caudal fibers, an intraoperative recovery of transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials can indicate an improvement of motor function postoperatively. Therefore, transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials can be considered as a useful tool to the surgeon to monitor the quality of decompression of the spinal cord

The risk of delayed spinal cord injury in pediatric spinal deformity surgery

Delayed spinal cord injury (SCI) hours or days after surgery, with uneventful monitoring and initial normal postoperative neurological examination, is a rare complication. Based on anecdotal evidence, the risk of delayed spinal cord injury might be higher than previously assumed. Therefore the aim of this study was to determine the risk of delayed SCI after pediatric spinal deformity surgery between 2013-2019 in the Netherlands. The total number of pediatric spinal deformity surgeries performed for scoliosis or kyphosis between 2013–2019 was obtained from the Dutch National Registration of Hospital Care. All eleven Dutch hospitals that perform pediatric spinal deformity surgery were contacted for occurrence of delayed SCI. From the identified patients with delayed SCI, the following data were collected: patient characteristics, details about the SCI, the surgical procedure, management and degree of improvement. 2884 pediatric deformity surgeries were identified between 2013–2019. Seven patients (0.24%) with delayed SCI were reported: 3 idiopathic, 2 neuromuscular (including 1 kypho-scoliosis) and 2 syndromic scoliosis. The risk of delayed SCI after pediatric deformity surgery was 1:595 in idiopathic scoliosis, 1:214 in syndromic scoliosis, 1:201 in neuromuscular scoliosis. All seven patients had a documented normal neurological examination in the first postoperative period; neurological deficits were first diagnosed at a median 16h (range 2.5-40) after surgery. The risk of delayed SCI after pediatric deformity surgery is higher than previously reported, especially in patients with non-idiopathic scoliosis. Regular postoperative testing for late neurologic deficit should be performed for timely diagnosis and management of this devastating complication

The risk of delayed spinal cord injury in pediatric spinal deformity surgery

Delayed spinal cord injury (SCI) hours or days after surgery, with uneventful monitoring and initial normal postoperative neurological examination, is a rare complication. Based on anecdotal evidence, the risk of delayed spinal cord injury might be higher than previously assumed. Therefore the aim of this study was to determine the risk of delayed SCI after pediatric spinal deformity surgery between 2013-2019 in the Netherlands. The total number of pediatric spinal deformity surgeries performed for scoliosis or kyphosis between 2013–2019 was obtained from the Dutch National Registration of Hospital Care. All eleven Dutch hospitals that perform pediatric spinal deformity surgery were contacted for occurrence of delayed SCI. From the identified patients with delayed SCI, the following data were collected: patient characteristics, details about the SCI, the surgical procedure, management and degree of improvement. 2884 pediatric deformity surgeries were identified between 2013–2019. Seven patients (0.24%) with delayed SCI were reported: 3 idiopathic, 2 neuromuscular (including 1 kypho-scoliosis) and 2 syndromic scoliosis. The risk of delayed SCI after pediatric deformity surgery was 1:595 in idiopathic scoliosis, 1:214 in syndromic scoliosis, 1:201 in neuromuscular scoliosis. All seven patients had a documented normal neurological examination in the first postoperative period; neurological deficits were first diagnosed at a median 16h (range 2.5-40) after surgery. The risk of delayed SCI after pediatric deformity surgery is higher than previously reported, especially in patients with non-idiopathic scoliosis. Regular postoperative testing for late neurologic deficit should be performed for timely diagnosis and management of this devastating complication

Risk factors for deep surgical site infections after spinal fusion

Surgical site infections (SSI) are undesired and troublesome complications after spinal surgery. The reported infection rates range from 0.7 to 11.9%, depending on the diagnosis and the complexity of the procedure. Besides operative factors, patient characteristics could also account for increased infection rates. Because the medical, economic and social costs of SSI are enormous, any significant reduction in risks will pay dividends. The purpose of this study is to compare patients who developed deep SSI following lumbar or thoracolumbar spinal fusion with a randomly selected group of patients who did not develop this complication in order to identify changeable risk factors. With a case–control analysis nested in a historical cohort of patients who had had a spinal fusion between January 1999 and December 2008, we identified 36 cases with deep SSI (CDC criteria). Information regarding patient-level and surgical-level risk factors was derived from standardized but routinely recorded data and compared with those acquired in a random selection of 135 uninfected patients. Univariate analyses and a multivariate logistic regression were performed. The overall rate of infection in 1,615 procedures (1,568 patients) was 2.2%. A positive history of spinal surgery was associated with an almost four times higher infection rate (OR = 3.7, 95% BI = 1.6–8.6). The risk of SSI increased with the number of levels fused, patients with diabetes had an almost six times higher risk and smokers had more than a two times higher risk for deep SSI. The most common organism cultured was Staphylococcus aureus. All infected patients underwent at least one reoperation, including an open débridement and received appropriate antibiotics to treat the organism. Patients who had had a previous spinal surgery are a high-risk group for infection compared with those that never had surgery. Total costs associated with preventive measures are substantial and should be compensated by health care insurance companies by means of separate clinical pathways. High-risk patients should be informed about the increased risk of complications

No effect of traction in patients with low back pain: a single centre, single blind, randomized controlled trial of Intervertebral Differential Dynamics Therapy®

Low back pain (LBP) poses a significant problem to society. Although initial conservative therapy may be beneficial, persisting chronic LBP still frequently leads to expensive invasive intervention. A novel non-invasive therapy that focuses on discogenic LBP is Intervertebral Differential Dynamics Therapy® (IDD Therapy, North American Medical Corp. Reg U.S.). IDD Therapy consists of intermittent traction sessions in the Accu-SPINA device (Steadfast Corporation Ltd, Essex, UK), an FDA approved, class II medical device. The intervertebral disc and facet joints are unloaded through axial distraction, positioning and relaxation cycles. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of IDD Therapy when added to a standard graded activity program for chronic LBP patients. In a single blind, single centre, randomized controlled trial; 60 consecutive patients were assigned to either the SHAM or the IDD Therapy. All subjects received the standard conservative therapeutic care (graded activity) and 20 sessions in the Accu-SPINA device. The traction weight in the IDD Therapy was systematically increased until 50% of a person’s body weight plus 4.45 kg (10 lb) was reached. The SHAM group received a non-therapeutic traction weight of 4.45 kg in all sessions. The main outcome was assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for LBP. Secondary outcomes were VAS scores for leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form 36 (SF-36). All parameters were measured before and 2, 6 and 14 weeks after start of the treatment. Fear of (re)injury due to movement or activities (Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia), coping strategies (Utrecht Coping List) and use of pain medication were recorded before and at 14 weeks. A repeated measures analysis was performed. The two groups were comparable at baseline in terms of demographic, clinical and psychological characteristics, indicating that the random allocation had succeeded. VAS low back pain improved significantly from 61 (±25) to 32 (±27) with the IDD protocol and 53 (±26) to 36 (±27) in the SHAM protocol. Moreover, leg pain, ODI and SF-36 scores improved significantly but in both groups. The use of pain medication decreased significantly, whereas scores for kinesiophobia and coping remained at the same non-pathological level. None of the parameters showed a difference between both protocols. Both treatment regimes had a significant beneficial effect on LBP, leg pain, functional status and quality of life after 14 weeks. The added axial, intermittent, mechanical traction of IDD Therapy to a standard graded activity program has been shown not to be effective