Claudin-3 and claudin-4: Distinct prognostic significance in triple-negative and luminal breast cancer

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the immunohistochemical expression of claudin-1, claudin-3, and claudin-4 in triple-negative breast carcinomas and compare it with several clinicopathologic parameters as well as their expression in luminal cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 128 cases of breast carcinoma were included in the study. For all these cases, immunohistochemistry for estrogen and progesterone receptors, Ki-67, and Her2 had already been performed, whereas Her2 2+ cases had been further characterized as positive or negative for Her2 amplification with the chromogenic in situ hybridization technique. Seventy-six tumors were triple negative. The remaining 52 were luminal cancers. All tumors were evaluated for the expression of claudin-1, claudin-3, and claudin-4. RESULTS: In the triple-negative group, the positive expression of claudin-3 and claudin-4 was related to unfavorable and favorable prognostic factors, respectively. Claudin-1 was not related to any parameter under evaluation. In the luminal cancer group, claudin-4 positivity was related to a shorter disease-free survival, whereas the inverse was observed for claudin-3. Moreover, all 3 claudins increased with increase of the grade and Ki-67 value in the luminal cancers. CONCLUSION: A distinct prognostic significance in the expression of claudin-3 and mostly of claudin-4 between triple-negative and luminal breast carcinomas was identified. Specifically, in triple-negative carcinomas, claudin-4 positivity could probably be considered as a biomarker of favorable prognosis, whereas in luminal cancers with claudin-4-positive expression, the administration of targeted therapy should eventually be part of the patients' management in the near future. Copyright © 2013 by Lippincott Williams &Wilkins