La colecistectomia videolaparoscopica elettiva: i limiti di un sogno ormai realtà

La tecnica laparoscopica per la colecistectomia elettiva è il capolinea di un’evoluzione volta a ridurre ai minimi termini la via d’accesso. Abbiamo analizzato dal 1° gennaio 2004 al 31 dicembre 2006 un totale di 5515 interventi di colecistectomia, di cui 4877 laparoscopici e 635 in tecnica tradizionale. Le complicanze e le diagnosi aggiuntive sono state codificate ricercandole nel database delle SDO della Regione Lombardia. La morbilità è stata di 82 casi (12.9%) con la tecnica tradizionale e da 109 casi (2.23%) con la tecnica laparoscopica; la mortalità è stata di 11 casi (1.73%) con la tecnica tradizionale e di 1 caso (0.02%) con la tecnica laparoscopia. Le giornate di degenza media sono state 14.40 con la tecnica tradizionale e 4.75 con la tecnica laparoscopia La morbilità nella tecnica open è sei volte superiore rispetto alla tecnica laparoscopica. Questo divario tra le due tecniche è presente in tutte le casistiche mondiali ed è il risultato della mini-invasività della laparoscopia rispetto all’incisione laparotomica, condizione che spiega e giustifica anche la differenza per quanto riguarda i giorni di degenza media in favore ovviamente della tecnica laparoscopia. La mortalità così alta nella tecnica tradizionale rispetto alla laparoscopia è da attribuirsi ai casi selezionati La prima importante osservazione è che nei nostri ospedali, come in tutti i migliori del mondo, la colecistectomia laparoscopica è diventata il gold standard di trattamento della colelitiasi e la seconda è che sempre di più la tecnica open è riservata alla patologia complicata della litiasi della colecisti e questo quindi ne giustifica l’importante divario, rispetto alla tecnica laparoscopica, per quanto concerne le giornate di degenza, la morbilità e la mortalità

Diversity and ethics in trauma and acute care surgery teams: results from an international survey

Background: Investigating the context of trauma and acute care surgery, the article aims at understanding the factors that can enhance some ethical aspects, namely the importance of patient consent, the perceptiveness of the ethical role of the trauma leader, and the perceived importance of ethics as an educational subject. Methods: The article employs an international questionnaire promoted by the World Society of Emergency Surgery. Results: Through the analysis of 402 fully filled questionnaires by surgeons from 72 different countries, the three main ethical topics are investigated through the lens of gender, membership of an academic or non-academic institution, an official trauma team, and a diverse group. In general terms, results highlight greater attention paid by surgeons belonging to academic institutions, official trauma teams, and diverse groups. Conclusions: Our results underline that some organizational factors (e.g., the fact that the team belongs to a university context or is more diverse) might lead to the development of a higher sensibility on ethical matters. Embracing cultural diversity forces trauma teams to deal with different mindsets. Organizations should, therefore, consider those elements in defining their organizational procedures. Level of evidence: Trauma and acute care teams work under tremendous pressure and complex circumstances, with their members needing to make ethical decisions quickly. The international survey allowed to shed light on how team assembly decisions might represent an opportunity to coordinate team member actions and increase performance

Team dynamics in emergency surgery teams: results from a first international survey

Background: Emergency surgery represents a unique context. Trauma teams are often multidisciplinary and need to operate under extreme stress and time constraints, sometimes with no awareness of the trauma\u2019s causes or the patient\u2019s personal and clinical information. In this perspective, the dynamics of how trauma teams function is fundamental to ensuring the best performance and outcomes. Methods: An online survey was conducted among the World Society of Emergency Surgery members in early 2021. 402 fully filled questionnaires on the topics of knowledge translation dynamics and tools, non-technical skills, and difficulties in teamwork were collected. Data were analyzed using the software R, and reported following the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Results: Findings highlight how several surgeons are still unsure about the meaning and potential of knowledge translation and its mechanisms. Tools like training, clinical guidelines, and non-technical skills are recognized and used in clinical practice. Others, like patients\u2019 and stakeholders\u2019 engagement, are hardly implemented, despite their increasing importance in the modern healthcare scenario. Several difficulties in working as a team are described, including the lack of time, communication, training, trust, and ego. Discussion: Scientific societies should take the lead in offering training and support about the abovementioned topics. Dedicated educational initiatives, practical cases and experiences, workshops and symposia may allow mitigating the difficulties highlighted by the survey\u2019s participants, boosting the performance of emergency teams. Additional investigation of the survey results and its characteristics may lead to more further specific suggestions and potential solutions

Diversity and ethics in trauma and acute care surgery teams: results from an international survey

Background Investigating the context of trauma and acute care surgery, the article aims at understanding the factors that can enhance some ethical aspects, namely the importance of patient consent, the perceptiveness of the ethical role of the trauma leader, and the perceived importance of ethics as an educational subject. Methods The article employs an international questionnaire promoted by the World Society of Emergency Surgery. Results Through the analysis of 402 fully filled questionnaires by surgeons from 72 different countries, the three main ethical topics are investigated through the lens of gender, membership of an academic or non-academic institution, an official trauma team, and a diverse group. In general terms, results highlight greater attention paid by surgeons belonging to academic institutions, official trauma teams, and diverse groups. Conclusions Our results underline that some organizational factors (e.g., the fact that the team belongs to a university context or is more diverse) might lead to the development of a higher sensibility on ethical matters. Embracing cultural diversity forces trauma teams to deal with different mindsets. Organizations should, therefore, consider those elements in defining their organizational procedures. Level of evidence Trauma and acute care teams work under tremendous pressure and complex circumstances, with their members needing to make ethical decisions quickly. The international survey allowed to shed light on how team assembly decisions might represent an opportunity to coordinate team member actions and increase performance