37 research outputs found
Challenges to Ethically Managing Parkinson Disease: An Interview Study of Patient Perspectives
This study investigated the current ethical issues in relation to recognizing and managing Parkinson disease (PD) from the
patientâs perspective.
Methods: Twelve patients living with PD who were from the medical schoolâs Patients as Educators
program were recruited. Semistructured interviews were conducted to record patient experiences in order to identify
potential ethical issues in relation to recognizing and managing PD. Thematic analysis was applied to the interview transcripts.
Results: Four key themes emerged from the interviews. These were information giving, coping, identity, and future medical
treatment. These data indicate variable experiences in relation to communication between patient and health-care professional,
better support for both planning end-of-life decisions and in coping with the diseaseâs impacts on their identity. Patients
with PD also struggle with access to support services and support for main carer.
Implications: To ensure ethical practice in
supporting patients with PD, these emerging themes need further investigation; and management guidelines relevant to PD
must be informed by research in this area to ensure ethical care of patients with PD, their carers, and families
Teaching clinical reasoning and decision-making skills to nursing students: Design, development, and usability evaluation of a serious game
Background
Serious games (SGs) are a type of simulation technology that may provide nursing students with the opportunity to practice their clinical reasoning and decision-making skills in a safe and authentic environment. Despite the growing number of SGs developed for healthcare professionals, few SGs are video based or address the domain of home health care.
Aims
This paper aims to describe the design, development, and usability evaluation of a video based SG for teaching clinical reasoning and decision-making skills to nursing students who care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in home healthcare settings.
Methods
A prototype SG was developed. A unified framework of usability called TURF (Task, User, Representation, and Function) and SG theory were employed to ensure a user-centered design. The educational content was based on the clinical decision-making model, Bloomâs taxonomy, and a Bachelor of Nursing curriculum. A purposeful sample of six participants evaluated the SG prototype in a usability laboratory. Cognitive walkthrough evaluations, a questionnaire, and individual interviews were used for the usability evaluation. The data were analyzed using qualitative deductive content analysis based on the TURF framework elements and related usability heuristics.
Results
The SG was perceived as being realistic, clinically relevant, and at an adequate level of complexity for the intended users. Usability issues regarding functionality and the userâcomputer interface design were identified. However, the SG was perceived as being easy to learn, and participants suggested that the SG could serve as a supplement to traditional training in laboratory and clinical settings.
Conclusions
Using video based scenarios with an authentic COPD patient and a home healthcare registered nurse as actors contributed to increased realism. Using different theoretical approaches in the SG design was considered an advantage of the design process. The SG was perceived as being useful, usable, and satisfying. The achievement of the desired functionality and the minimization of userâcomputer interface issues emphasize the importance of conducting a usability evaluation during the SG development process
Curricular changes and interim posts during Covid-19 : graduates' perspectives
Background
During the COVID-19 pandemic UK medical schools facilitated the early graduation of their final-year medical students to âFoundation interim Year 1 (FiY1) doctorsâ through amendments made to curricula and final assessment. Such changes gave opportunity for evaluation. This study therefore aimed to explore 1) graduate perspective on the implementation of FiY1 and 2) how changes to course structures have affected self-reported preparedness for work.
Methods
Questionnaire surveys using Likert scale and free-text responses (n =â45), and semi-structured interviews (n =â7) were conducted with FiY1s from two UK medical schools contrasting in the amendments made to course structures. Data were analysed using quantitative methods and thematic analysis; 44% (n =â20) of respondents believed that governing health bodies had not communicated sufficiently prior to starting work.
Results
Graduates who had sat modified practical and written examinations reported âlegitimacyâ and feeling more prepared compared to having not sat examinations (practical 100%, n =â17; written 88.3%, n =â15). Graduates from both schools agreed that carrying out assistantships as originally scheduled would have made them feel more prepared (91.1%, n =â41).
Conclusions
The implementation of FiY1 was largely well received by graduates yet assistantship programmes may fulfil a similar role in normal times. Medical schools and governing bodies must ensure effective communication channels exist with students in order to better prepare them for their first posts, especially in times of crisis. Additionally, final examinations contribute to feelings of preparedness for work and instil a sense of legitimacy, a finding which is relevant to working within the current programmatic assessment structure
Instructional multimedia: An investigation of student and instructor attitudes and student study behavior
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Educators in allied health and medical education programs utilize instructional multimedia to facilitate psychomotor skill acquisition in students. This study examines the effects of instructional multimedia on student and instructor attitudes and student study behavior.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Subjects consisted of 45 student physical therapists from two universities. Two skill sets were taught during the course of the study. Skill set one consisted of knee examination techniques and skill set two consisted of ankle/foot examination techniques. For each skill set, subjects were randomly assigned to either a control group or an experimental group. The control group was taught with live demonstration of the examination skills, while the experimental group was taught using multimedia. A cross-over design was utilized so that subjects in the control group for skill set one served as the experimental group for skill set two, and vice versa. During the last week of the study, students and instructors completed written questionnaires to assess attitude toward teaching methods, and students answered questions regarding study behavior.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There were no differences between the two instructional groups in attitudes, but students in the experimental group for skill set two reported greater study time alone compared to other groups.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Multimedia provides an efficient method to teach psychomotor skills to students entering the health professions. Both students and instructors identified advantages and disadvantages for both instructional techniques. Reponses relative to instructional multimedia emphasized efficiency, processing level, autonomy, and detail of instruction compared to live presentation. Students and instructors identified conflicting views of instructional detail and control of the content.</p
Do photographs, older adultsâ narratives and collaborative dialogue foster anticipatory reflection (âpreflectionâ) in medical students?
Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers
The impact of patient feedback on the medical performance of qualified doctors: a systematic review
Background:
Patient feedback is considered integral to quality improvement and professional development. However, while popular across the educational continuum, evidence to support its efficacy in facilitating positive behaviour change in a postgraduate setting remains unclear. This review therefore aims to explore the evidence that supports, or refutes, the impact of patient feedback on the medical performance of qualified doctors. //
Methods:
Electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Medline and PsycINFO were systematically searched for studies assessing the impact of patient feedback on medical performance published in the English language between 2006-2016. Impact was defined as a measured change in behaviour using Barrâs (2000) adaptation of Kirkpatrickâs four level evaluation model. Papers were quality appraised, thematically analysed and synthesised using a narrative approach. //
Results:
From 1,269 initial studies, 20 articles were included (qualitative (n=8); observational (n=6); systematic review (n=3); mixed methodology (n=1); randomised control trial (n=1); and longitudinal (n=1) design). One article identified change at an organisational level (Kirkpatrick level 4); six reported a measured change in behaviour (Kirkpatrick level 3b); 12 identified self-reported change or intention to change (Kirkpatrick level 3a), and one identified knowledge or skill acquisition (Kirkpatrick level 2). No study identified a change at the highest level, an improvement in the health and wellbeing of patients. The main factors found to influence the impact of patient feedback were: specificity; perceived credibility; congruence with physician self-perceptions and performance expectations; presence of facilitation and reflection; and inclusion of narrative comments. The quality of feedback facilitation and local professional cultures also appeared integral to positive behaviour change. //
Conclusion:
Patient feedback can have an impact on medical performance. However, actionable change is influenced by several contextual factors and cannot simply be guaranteed. Patient feedback is likely to be more influential if it is specific, collected through credible methods and contains narrative information. Data obtained should be fed back in a way that facilitates reflective discussion and encourages the formulation of actionable behaviour change. A supportive cultural understanding of patient feedback and its intended purpose is also essential for its effective use