Cholesteatoma of the external ear canal: etiological factors, symptoms and clinical findings in a series of 48 cases

BACKGROUND: To evaluate symptoms, clinical findings, and etiological factors in external ear canal cholesteatoma (EECC). METHOD: Retrospective evaluation of clinical records of all consecutive patients with EECC in the period 1979 to 2005 in a tertiary referral centre. Main outcome measures were incidence rates, classification according to causes, symptoms, extensions in the ear canal including adjacent structures, and possible etiological factors. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were identified with 48 EECC. Overall incidence rate was 0.30 cases per year per 100,000 inhabitants. Twenty-five cases were primary, while 23 cases were secondary: postoperative (n = 9), postinflammatory (n = 5), postirradiatory (n = 7), and posttraumatic (n = 2). Primary EECC showed a right/left ratio of 12/13 and presented with otalgia (n = 15), itching (n = 5), occlusion (n = 4), hearing loss (n = 3), fullness (n = 2), and otorrhea (n = 1). Similar symptoms were found in secondary EECC, but less pronounced. In total the temporomandibular joint was exposed in 11 cases, while the mastoid and middle ear was invaded in six and three cases, respectively. In one primary case the facial nerve was exposed and in a posttraumatic case the atticus and antrum were invaded. In primary EECC 48% of cases reported mechanical trauma. CONCLUSION: EECC is a rare condition with inconsistent and silent symptoms, whereas the extent of destruction may be pronounced. Otalgia was the predominant symptom and often related to extension into nearby structures. Whereas the aetiology of secondary EECC can be explained, the origin of primary EECC remains uncertain; smoking and minor trauma of the ear canal may predispose

Intratympanic and systemic steroids for sudden hearing loss

Objective: To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of intratympanic dexamethasone combined with systemic prednisolone in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). Study Design: Prospective, quasirandomized, multicenter clinical trial. Setting: One university hospital and 2 affiliated hospitals. Patients: A total of 92 eligible patients with ISSNHL were allocated into 2 groups. Patients in the control group were treated with systemic prednisolone alone. Patients of the combined treatment group received additionally 3 intratympanic dexamethasone injections within 5 days. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures used were the differences between pretreatment and posttreatment pure-tone audiometry averages (PTAs) and speech discrimination scores (SDSs). Successful treatment was defined as a greater than 10 dB improvement in PTA and 15% in SDS. The final assessment of hearing was performed 3 months after completion of treatment. Results: Significant hearing recovery was observed in 31 (67.39%) of 46 cases, and in 24 (52.17%) of 46 control patients. Patients receiving combination therapy had a median improvement in PTA of 23.12 dB and a median increase in SDS of 32%. In the control group, the median hearing gain was 16.87 dB and 18%, respectively. The differences between the 2 groups were not statistically significant (p = 0.10 and p = 0.13). However, after performing a post hoc analysis by excluding individuals with profound hearing loss (PTA, >90 dB), the combined treatment group showed significant improvement compared with the control group (p = 0.04). No serious complications or adverse reactions were reported. Conclusion: The addition of intratympanic steroids to the conventional systemic steroid therapy may provide a safe and potentially effective therapeutic option in patients with mild-to-severe ISSNHL. © 2013, Otology & Neurotology, Inc

Intratympanic steroid therapy for sudden hearing loss: A review of the literature

Objective: Administration of steroids systematically is considered to be the most commonly accepted treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). In recent years there has been increasing scientific interest in treating ISSNHL by means of local steroid delivery. Usually, intratympanic steroids are used in three main protocols, as initial treatment, as adjunctive treatment given concomitantly with systemic steroids and as salvage treatment after failure of standard therapy. The purpose of this review is to examine the published literature regarding the therapeutic value of each method of treatment and to seek answers about the best delivery technique and the optimal administration schedule. Data Sources: Literature review from 1996 to 2009, PubMed and Medline. Study Selection: We searched for trials concerning clinical evaluation of intratympanic steroids in ISSNHL patients, as a salvage treatment, as a first line therapy and in combination with the conventional therapy. Randomized and non-randomized case control studies and case series studies were the types of trials available for review. Data Extraction: All the articles described in the study selection were used for this review. Data Synthesis: Statistical techniques were not used. Conclusion: On the basis of the available literature, it seems that topical steroids can be a valuable solution for ISSNHL patients who either cannot tolerate systemic steroid therapy or are refractory to it. Concerning the combined therapy, due to the controversial results of the existing studies, it cannot be determined yet whether this treatment protocol could yield superior results as a first line therapy. The need for establishment of standard criteria of hearing recovery should be underlined. © 2010, Otology & Neurotology, Inc

Improvement of Hot Ductility in a Low-Carbon Steel by the Application of the Precooling

The effect of precooling on hot ductility of a low-carbon steel is investigated. It shows a wide reduction of ductility in the temperature range of 700-900 degrees C with a general hot tensile test. The hot ductility is increased by applying precooling before the hot-tensile test. The increase in the reduction of area (RA) reaches 40-50% when the steel is precooled to 500 degrees C. Active precipitation of (Mn, Cu)-sulfide is observed during the precooling. The increased RA is attributed to the active sulfide formation, which decreases sulfur segregation at grain boundaries.11Nsciescopu