European Academy of Neurology and European Stroke Organization consensus statement and practical guidance for pre-hospital management of stroke

Background and purposeThe reduction of delay between onset and hospital arrival and adequate pre-hospital care of persons with acute stroke are important for improving the chances of a favourable outcome. The objective is to recommend evidence-based practices for the management of patients with suspected stroke in the pre-hospital setting. MethodsThe GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to define the key clinical questions. An expert panel then reviewed the literature, established the quality of the evidence, and made recommendations. ResultsDespite very low quality of evidence educational campaigns to increase the awareness of immediately calling emergency medical services are strongly recommended. Moderate quality evidence was found to support strong recommendations for the training of emergency medical personnel in recognizing the symptoms of a stroke and in implementation of a pre-hospital code stroke' including highest priority dispatch, pre-hospital notification and rapid transfer to the closest stroke-ready' centre. Insufficient evidence was found to recommend a pre-hospital stroke scale to predict large vessel occlusion. Despite the very low quality of evidence, restoring normoxia in patients with hypoxia is recommended, and blood pressure lowering drugs and treating hyperglycaemia with insulin should be avoided. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of mobile stroke units delivering intravenous thrombolysis at the scene. Because only feasibility studies have been reported, no recommendations can be provided for pre-hospital telemedicine during ambulance transport. ConclusionsThese guidelines inform on the contemporary approach to patients with suspected stroke in the pre-hospital setting. Further studies, preferably randomized controlled trials, are required to examine the impact of particular interventions on quality parameters and outcome. Click for the corresponding questions to this CME article

Sex and gender differences in acute stroke care: metrics, access to treatment and outcome. A territorial analysis of the Stroke Code System of Catalonia

Introduction: Previous studies have reported differences in the management and outcome of women stroke patients in comparison with men. We aim to analyze sex and gender differences in the medical assistance, access to treatment and outcome of acute stroke patients in Catalonia. Patients and methods: Data were obtained from a prospective population-based registry of stroke code activations in Catalonia (CICAT) from January/2016 to December/2019. The registry includes demographic data, stroke severity, stroke subtype, reperfusion therapy, and time workflow. Centralized clinical outcome at 90 days was assessed in patients receiving reperfusion therapy. Results: A total of 23,371 stroke code activations were registered (54% men, 46% women). No differences in prehospital time metrics were observed. Women more frequently had a final diagnosis of stroke mimic, were older and had a previous worse functional situation. Among ischemic stroke patients, women had higher stroke severity and more frequently presented proximal large vessel occlusion. Women received more frequently reperfusion therapy (48.2% vs 43.1%, p < 0.001). Women tended to present a worse outcome at 90 days, especially for the group receiving only IVT (good outcome 56.7% vs 63.8%; p < 0.001), but not for the group of patients treated with IVT + MT or MT alone, although sex was not independently associated with clinical outcome in logistic regression analysis (OR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.94–1.23; p = 0.27) nor in the analysis after matching using the propensity score (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.97–1.22). Discussion and conclusion: We found some differences by sex in that acute stroke was more frequent in older women and the stroke severity was higher. We found no differences in medical assistance times, access to reperfusion treatment and early complications. Worse clinical outcome at 90 days in women was conditioned by stroke severity and older age, but not by sex itself

Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system's bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. Methods: Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15-May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26-March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. Results: Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = -0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05-2.4], p 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4-0.9], p 0.015) during the pandemic period. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia's stroke system's weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system's analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately

Immunoglobulin, glucocorticoid, or combination therapy for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: a propensity-weighted cohort study

Background Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), a hyperinflammatory condition associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, has emerged as a serious illness in children worldwide. Immunoglobulin or glucocorticoids, or both, are currently recommended treatments. Methods The Best Available Treatment Study evaluated immunomodulatory treatments for MIS-C in an international observational cohort. Analysis of the first 614 patients was previously reported. In this propensity-weighted cohort study, clinical and outcome data from children with suspected or proven MIS-C were collected onto a web-based Research Electronic Data Capture database. After excluding neonates and incomplete or duplicate records, inverse probability weighting was used to compare primary treatments with intravenous immunoglobulin, intravenous immunoglobulin plus glucocorticoids, or glucocorticoids alone, using intravenous immunoglobulin as the reference treatment. Primary outcomes were a composite of inotropic or ventilator support from the second day after treatment initiation, or death, and time to improvement on an ordinal clinical severity scale. Secondary outcomes included treatment escalation, clinical deterioration, fever, and coronary artery aneurysm occurrence and resolution. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN69546370. Findings We enrolled 2101 children (aged 0 months to 19 years) with clinically diagnosed MIS-C from 39 countries between June 14, 2020, and April 25, 2022, and, following exclusions, 2009 patients were included for analysis (median age 8·0 years [IQR 4·2–11·4], 1191 [59·3%] male and 818 [40·7%] female, and 825 [41·1%] White). 680 (33·8%) patients received primary treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin, 698 (34·7%) with intravenous immunoglobulin plus glucocorticoids, 487 (24·2%) with glucocorticoids alone; 59 (2·9%) patients received other combinations, including biologicals, and 85 (4·2%) patients received no immunomodulators. There were no significant differences between treatments for primary outcomes for the 1586 patients with complete baseline and outcome data that were considered for primary analysis. Adjusted odds ratios for ventilation, inotropic support, or death were 1·09 (95% CI 0·75–1·58; corrected p value=1·00) for intravenous immunoglobulin plus glucocorticoids and 0·93 (0·58–1·47; corrected p value=1·00) for glucocorticoids alone, versus intravenous immunoglobulin alone. Adjusted average hazard ratios for time to improvement were 1·04 (95% CI 0·91–1·20; corrected p value=1·00) for intravenous immunoglobulin plus glucocorticoids, and 0·84 (0·70–1·00; corrected p value=0·22) for glucocorticoids alone, versus intravenous immunoglobulin alone. Treatment escalation was less frequent for intravenous immunoglobulin plus glucocorticoids (OR 0·15 [95% CI 0·11–0·20]; p<0·0001) and glucocorticoids alone (0·68 [0·50–0·93]; p=0·014) versus intravenous immunoglobulin alone. Persistent fever (from day 2 onward) was less common with intravenous immunoglobulin plus glucocorticoids compared with either intravenous immunoglobulin alone (OR 0·50 [95% CI 0·38–0·67]; p<0·0001) or glucocorticoids alone (0·63 [0·45–0·88]; p=0·0058). Coronary artery aneurysm occurrence and resolution did not differ significantly between treatment groups. Interpretation Recovery rates, including occurrence and resolution of coronary artery aneurysms, were similar for primary treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin when compared to glucocorticoids or intravenous immunoglobulin plus glucocorticoids. Initial treatment with glucocorticoids appears to be a safe alternative to immunoglobulin or combined therapy, and might be advantageous in view of the cost and limited availability of intravenous immunoglobulin in many countries. Funding Imperial College London, the European Union's Horizon 2020, Wellcome Trust, the Medical Research Foundation, UK National Institute for Health and Care Research, and National Institutes of Health

Impact of a comprehensive stroke centre on the care of patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to cervical artery dissection

Introduction: Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is the cause of 2% to 3% of ischaemic strokes and 10% to 25% of the ischaemic strokes in young people. Our objective is to evaluate whether the implementation of a comprehensive stroke centre (CSC) improves the diagnosis and modifies the prognosis of patients with acute stroke due to CAD. Patients and methods: Retrospective study of a registry of consecutive patients with acute stroke due to CAD. They were classified according to the period of care at our centre: pre-CSC (October 2004 to March 2008, 42 months) or post-CSC (April 2008 to June 2012, 51 months). We compared baseline characteristics, methods of diagnosis, treatment and outcome of these patients in both periods. Results: Nine patients were diagnosed with CAD in the pre-CSC and 26 in the post-CSC, representing 0.8% and 2.1% of all ischaemic strokes treated in each period, respectively. The diagnosis of CAD was made within the first 24 hours in 42.3% of the patients in the post-CSC versus 0% in the pre-CSC, through the use of urgent cerebral angiography as a diagnostic test in 46.2% of cases in the second period compared to 0% in the first. The severity of stroke (median NIHSS score 11 vs. 3, P = .014) and time to neurological care (265 min vs. 148, P = .056) were higher in the post-CSC period. Endovascular treatment was performed in 34.3%, all in the post-CSC. The functional outcome was comparable in both periods. Conclusions: The implementation of a CSC increases the frequency of the diagnosis of CAD, as well as the treatment options for these patients in the acute phase of stroke. Resumen: Introducción: La disección de arterias cervicales (DAC) es la causa del 2-3% de ictus isquémicos y del 10-25% en pacientes jóvenes. Nuestro objetivo es evaluar si la implementación de un centro terciario de ictus (CTI) facilita el diagnóstico y modifica el pronóstico de los pacientes con ictus agudo por DAC. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de un registro de pacientes consecutivos con ictus agudo por DAC. Se clasificaron según el periodo de atención: pre-CTI (octubre 2004-marzo 2008, 42 meses) o post-CTI (abril 2008-junio 2012, 51 meses). Se compararon las características basales, el método diagnóstico, el tratamiento y la evolución de estos pacientes entre ambos periodos. Resultados: Se diagnosticó a 9 pacientes con DAC en el periodo pre-CTI y 26 en el post-CTI, representando el 0,8 y el 2,1% de los ictus isquémicos atendidos en cada periodo. El diagnóstico de DAC se realizó en las primeras 24 h en el 42,3% de pacientes en el periodo post-CTI frente al 0% en el pre-CTI, gracias al uso de la arteriografía cerebral urgente como prueba diagnóstica en el 46,2% de los casos en el segundo periodo frente al 0% en el primero. La gravedad del ictus (mediana puntuación escala NIHSS 11 vs. 3, p = 0,014) y el tiempo hasta la atención neurológica (265 minutos vs. 148, p = 0,056) fueron mayores en la fase post-CTI. Se realizó tratamiento endovascular en el 34,3%, todos en el periodo post-CTI. El pronóstico funcional fue comparable en ambos periodos. Conclusiones: La implementación de un CTI incrementa la frecuencia en el diagnóstico de DAC y aumenta las opciones terapéuticas en la fase aguda del ictus en estos pacientes. Keywords: Cervical artery dissection, Stroke, Comprehensive stroke centre, Angiography, Systemic thrombolysis, Endovascular treatment, Palabras clave: Disección de arterias cervicales, Ictus, Centro terciario de ictus, Arteriografía, Trombólisis sistémica, Tratamiento endovascula

Supplementary Material for: Prestroke Physical Activity Is Associated with Good Functional Outcome and Arterial Recanalization after Stroke due to a Large Vessel Occlusion

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Although multiple studies and meta-analyses have consistently suggested that regular physical activity (PhA) is associated with a decreased stroke risk and recurrence, there is limited data on the possible preconditioning effect of prestroke PhA on stroke severity and prognosis. We aimed to study the association of prestroke PhA with different outcome variables in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to an anterior large vessel occlusion. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The Prestroke Physical Activity and Functional Recovery in Patients with Ischemic Stroke and Arterial Occlusion trial is an observational and longitudinal study that included consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke admitted to a single tertiary stroke center. Main inclusion criteria were: anterior circulation ischemic stroke within 12 h from symptom onset; presence of a confirmed anterior large vessel occlusion, and functional independence previous to stroke. Prestroke PhA was evaluated with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and categorized into mild, moderate and high levels by means of metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes per week thresholds. The primary outcome measure was good functional outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin scale ≤2). Secondary outcomes were severity of stroke at admission, complete early recanalization, early dramatic neurological improvement and final infarct volume. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the study period, 159 patients fulfilled the above criteria. The mean age was 68 years, 62% were men and the baseline NIHSS score was 17. Patients with high levels of prestroke PhA were younger, had more frequently distal occlusions and had lower levels of blood glucose and fibrinogen at admission. After multivariate analysis, a high level of prestroke PhA was associated with a good functional outcome at 3 months. Regarding secondary outcome variables and after adjustment for relevant factors, a high level of prestroke PhA was independently associated with milder stroke severity at admission, early dramatic improvement, early arterial recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis and lower final infarct volume. The beneficial association of prestroke PhA with stroke outcomes was already present with a cutoff point of 1,000 MET min/week, a level of PhA easily achieved by walking 1 h/day during 5 days or by doing a vigorous aerobic activity 1 h/day twice a week. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Prestroke PhA is independently associated with favorable stroke outcomes after a large vessel occlusion. Future research on the underlying mechanisms is needed to understand this neuroprotective effect of PhA

Thrombectomy vs Medical Management in Mild Strokes due to Large Vessel Occlusion: Exploratory Analysis from the EXTEND-IA Trials and a Pooled International Cohort

First published: 22 May 2022Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate functional and safety outcomes for endovascular thrombectomy(EVT) versus medical management (MM) in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and mild neurological deficits,stratified by perfusion imaging mismatch. Methods: The pooled cohort consisted of patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) 6 seconds) volumes (median [IQR]: 64 [26–96] ml vs MMpri: 40 [14–76] ml,p< 0.001) and higher presentation NIHSS(median [IQR]: 4 [2–5] vs MMpri:3[2–4],p< 0.001). Functional independence was similar (EVTpri: 77.4% vs MMpri:75.6%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.82–2.03,p=0.27). EVT had worse safety regarding sICH (EVTpri: 16.3% vs MMpri: 1.3%,p< 0.001) and neurological worsening (EVTpri: 19.6% vs MMpri: 6.7%,p< 0.001). In 414 subjects (76.7%) with target mismatch, EVT was associated with improved functional independence(EVTpri: 77.4% vs MMpri: 72.7%, aOR=1.68, 95% CI=1.01–2.81,p=0.048), whereas there was a trend toward less favorable outcomes with primary EVT (EVTpri: 77.4% vs MMpri: 83.3%, aOR=0.39, 95% CI=0.12–1.34,p=0.13) with-out target mismatch (pinteraction=0.06). Similar findings were observed in a propensity score-matched subpopulation. Interpretation: Overall, EVT was not associated with improved clinical outcomes in mild strokes due to LVO, and sICH was increased. However, in patients with target mismatch profile, EVT was associated with increased functional independence. Perfusion imaging may be helpful to select mild stroke patients for EVT.Amrou Sarraj, MD, Gregory W. Albers, MD, Jordi Blasco, MD, Juan F. Arenillas, MD, Marc Ribo, MD, Ameer E. Hassan, DO, Natalia Pérez de la Ossa, MD, Teddy Yuan, Hao Wu, MBChB, PhD, Pere Cardona Portela, MD, Michael G. Abraham, MD, Michael Chen, MD, Laith Maali, MD, Timothy J. Kleinig, MBBS, Dennis Cordato, MBBS, Adam Nathan Wallace, MD, Joanna D. Schaafsma, MD, Navdeep Sangha, MD, Daniel P. Gibson, MD, Spiros L. Blackburn, MD, Mercedes De Lera Alfonso, MD, DeepPujara, MBBS, MPH, MS, Faris Shaker, MBChB, Margy E. McCullough, Hicks, MD, Javier Luis Moreno Negrete, MD, Arturo Renu, MD, PhD, James Beharry, MBChB, Cecilia Cappelen, Smith, MBBS, Luis Rodríguez, Esparragoza, MD, Marta Olivé, Gadea, MD, Manuel Requena, MD, Tareq Almaghrabi, MD, Vitor Mendes Pereira, MD, Clark Sitton, MD, Sheryl Martin, Schild, MD, Sarah Song, MD, Henry Ma, MBBS, Leonid Churilov, PhD, Peter J. Mitchell, MBBS, Mark W. Parsons, MD, Anthony Furlan, MD, James C. Grotta, MD, Geoffrey A. Donnan, MD, Stephen M. Davis, MD, andBruce C. V. Campbell, PhD, for the PERFECT-MILD Collaborator