Influence of soil texture and compost on the early growth and nutrient uptake of Moringa oleifera Lam

Article Details: Received: 2019-01-15 | Accepted: 2019-06-03 | Available online: 2019-06-30https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2019.22.02.26-33Soil is the main reservoir of water and nutrients, and thus controls the availability of most essential plant nutrients for crop growth and establishment. Therefore, a study was conducted at Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria to investigate the effects of soil texture and compost on early growth of Moringa oleifera (M. oleifera). The experiment was a split plot laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The main treatment comprises of  three soil texture; sand, loamy sand, and clay while the sub-plot treatment was compost at four rates of 0, 2.5, 5 and 10 tha-1 per 10 kg of soil and NPK 15:15:15 at the rate of 90 kg Nha-1. Data on plant height, number of leaves, stem diameter were measured at 2 week interval for 10 weeks. Results showed that Moringa plant produced in loamy sand was superior in plant height, number of leaves and stem girth irrespective of compost applied. At 10 weeks after sowing, fresh shoot weights/pot was 73.3, 31.7, 30.3 g respectively for loamy sand, clay and sand.  M. oleifera N uptake in loamy sand was significantly (p<0.05) greater by 57 and 50%, respectively, than sand and clay. P uptake was significantly higher at 5 ton ha-1 than the control and other treatments. The study concluded that, combination of loamy sand and 5 ton ha-1 of compost was suitable for the early growth of M. oleifera.ReferencesADEBAYO, A.G. et al. (2011) Assessment of organic amendments on vegetative development and nutrient uptake of Moringa oleifera Lam in the nursery. Asian J. Plant Sci., vol. 10, pp. 74–79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2011.74ADUAYI, E.A. et al. (2002) Fertilizer use and management practices for crops in Nigeria. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.AGYENIM-BAOTENG, S. et al. (2006) Poultry manure Effect on growth and yield of maize. W. Afri. J. Appli. Ecol., no. 9, pp. 61–70.AKANBI, W.B. et al. (2005) Suitability of composted maize straw and mineral nitrogen fertilizer for tomato production. J. Veg. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 57–65.AMANUALLAH, M.M et al. (2010) Prospects and potential of poultry manure. Asian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 9, pp. 172–182.ASANTE, W. J. et al. (2012) Initial growth response of Moringa oleifera seedlings to different soil amendments. African Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 7, no. 45, pp. 6082–6086.BECKER, K. and SIDDHURAJU, P. (2003) Antioxidant properties of various solvent extracts of Total Phenolic Constituents from Three Different Agro Climatic Origins of Drumstick Tree (Moringa oleifera). Agric. Food Chem., vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 2144–2155.BENNETT, R. N. et al. (2003) Profiling glucosinolates and phenolics in vegetative and reproductive tissues of the multi-purpose trees Moringa oleifera L. (horseradish tree) and Moringa stenopetala L. J. Agric. Food Chem., no. 51, pp. 3546–3553.BRAY, R. H. and KURTZ, I. T. (1945) Determination of total and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science, no. 59, pp. 45–49.BREMNER, J. N. and MULVARY, C.S. (1965) Total nitrogen. In: SPARKS (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis. Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 599–622.CHUKWUKA, K.S. and OMOTAYO, O.E. (2009) Soil fertility restoration potentials of tithonia green manure and water hyacinth compost on a nutrient depleted soil in Southwestern Nigeria. Res. J. Soil Biol., no. 1, pp. 20–30.DOERR, B. and CAMERON, L. (2005) Moringa Leaf Powder. Echo Technical Note.ERIN H. (2007) “Organic Farming“ Microsoft Student 200 (DVD). WA: Microsoft Corporation.ESU, Z.E. (1991) Detailed Soil Survey of NIHORT Farm at Bunkure, Kano State, Nigeria. Zaria: Institute for Agricultural Research, Ahmadu Bello University.FOIDL, N. et al. (2001) The Potential of Moringa oleifera for Agricultural and Industrial uses. In: FUGLIE (Ed.). The Miracle Tree/The Multiple Attributes of Moringa CTA, pp. 45–76.FRANZLUEBBERS, A.J. (2002) Water infiltration and soil structure related to organic matter and its stratification with depth. Soil Till. Res., vol. 66, pp. 197–205.FUGLIE, L.J. (2001) The Miracle Tree, Moringa oleifera: Natural Nutrition for the Tropics. Training Manual. Dakar: Church World Service.GEE, G.W. and OR, D. (2002) Particle size analysis. In: DANE AND TOPP (Eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Methods of Soil Analysis. Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 255–293.IMORO, A.W.M. et al. (2012) Preliminary study on effects of two different sources of organic manure on the growth performance of Moringa oleifera seedlings. J. Bio. Agric. Health Care, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 147–158.MURWIRA, H.K. and MUGWIRA, L.M. (1997) Use of cattle manure to improve soil fertility in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe: Department of Research and Specialist Services, Chemistry and Soil Research Institute.NELSON, D.W. and SOMMERS, L.E. (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: SPARKS (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis. Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 961–1010.OSHUNSANYA, S.O. et al. (2015) Growth and mineral composition of Moringa oleifera as affected by soil texture under water stress conditions. Journal of Applied research, vol. 7, pp. 151–160.OYEDEJI, S. et al. (2014) Effects of NPK and poultry manure on growth, yield, and proximate composition of three Amaranths. J. Bot., Article ID 828750.PAHLA, I. et al. (2013) Effects of soil type and manure level on the establishment and growth of Moringa oleifera. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 226–230.PALADA, M.C. and CHANG, L.C. (2003) Suggested Cultural practices For Moringa AVRDC international cooperators. Guid Online]. Retrieved 2018-11-28 from http://www.avrdc.org/Lc/indigenous/moringa.pdfPALM, A.C. et al. (2001) Organic input for soil fertility management in tropical agroecosystems: Application of organic resource database. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol. 83, pp. 27–42.PARR, J. F. and COLACICCO, D. (1987) Energy in Plant Nutrition and Pest Control In: Energy in World Agriculture. London: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 81–129.SAS institute, 2002. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. In: Version 8.2. SAS Institute Cary, NC.SWAIDER, M.J. et al. (1992) Producing Vegetables. 4th ed., Vero Media Platform.TEL, D. and RAO, F. (1982) Automated and semi-automated methods for soil and plant analysis. Ibadan: IITA, pp. 201– 270.ZEBARTH, B. J. et al. (1999) Influence of organic waste amendments on selected soil physical and chemical properties. Can. J. Soil Sci., vol. 79, pp. 501–504

Willing to be the change: Perceived drivers and barriers to participation in urban smart farming projects

Psychological research on perceptions on urban smart farming is scarce, especially in a Global South context. To reach wide acceptance of urban smart farming and create effective strategies for the implementation of this innovative technology, we need insights into people’s perceptions. In this article, we investigate the factors that motivate or hinder people to engage in community-led urban smart farming projects. We present a systematic assessment of perceived drivers and barriers for urban smart farming, based on a survey study in three African countries, Nigeria, South Africa and Zambia. Using multiple regression analysis, we could identify country-specific drivers and barriers. People’s demographics have been found to play less of a role in predicting intentions to be involved in urban smart farming projects. We recommend considering the human dimension when promoting innovative technologies such as urban smart farming and encourage practitioners to assess each region individually when promoting innovative farming techniques

Effects of Urban Smart Farming on Local Economy and Food Production in Urban Areas in African Cities

African cities are growing rapidly into inefficient, unsustainable, resource-starved ecosystems that negatively affect the local economy and food production. Food as a critical resource needs to be produced and managed more efficiently by local communities in the urban area. Urban smart farming (USF) has emerged as an important mechanism to address these challenges to achieve sustainable, resilient, and inclusive cities. USF has the potential to be the industry 4.0 green revolution in agriculture, which embodies innovative digital technologies. However, it is unclear how local African communities and key stakeholders perceive this novel solution and if they are willing to engage in its uptake. This study examines the relationship between the perceived benefits and challenges of USF and the willingness of local African communities to actively participate in USF projects as a potential mechanism to improve local economy and food production. To assess this relationship, a causal model was developed. In this causal model, the local economy and food production were defined as dependent variables. The conceptualized model and the inherent causality between the constructs were validated through a survey administered among African cities’ residents. The results of structural equation modelling indicate a significant positive impact of perceived benefits of USF as well as the willingness of African communities to engage in this technology on local economy and food production. Only minimal adverse effects of the perceived challenges of USF on the local economy and food production have been found. The study concludes that the benefits and willingness of local communities are the key drivers for implementing urban smart farms in African metropolitans. Therefore, it is recommended to focus on the benefits and the motivation of local communities in African cities where USF shall be further developed, rather than on the barriers. The validated causal model can be used as a framework to facilitate the adoption of USF in Africa and consequently enhance the local economy and food production in African cities