Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by post-operative trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (NCT) increases the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) alone in women with HER2 positive breast cancer (BC). pCR in this setting is associated with improved EFS. Whether NCT preferentially improves EFS in comparison to NC followed by adjuvant trastuzumab initiated postoperatively (NCAT) has not been addressed. Using clinical data from women with HER2 positive BC treated at 7 European institutions between 2007 and 2010 we sought to investigate the impact on breast cancer outcomes of concomitant (NCT) versus sequential (NCAT) treatment in HER2 positive early BC. The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for event free survival with NCT compared with NCAT was 0.63 (95% CI 0.37–1.08; p = 0.091). Multivariable analysis revealed that treatment group, tumour size and ER status were significantly associated with EFS from diagnosis. In the whole group NCT was associated with a reduced risk of an event relative to NCAT, an effect that was confined to ER negative (HR: 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10–0.62; p = 0.003) as opposed to ER positive tumours (HR: 1.07; 95% CI, 0.46–2.52; p = 0.869). HER2 positive/ER negative BC treated with NC gain greatest survival benefit when trastuzumab is administered in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant period rather than in the adjuvant period alone. These data support the early introduction of targeted combination therapy in HER2 positive/ER negative BC

Biomarkers in anal cancer: from biological understanding to stratified treatment

Squamous cell carcinomas of the anus and anal canal represent a model of a cancer and perhaps the first where level 1 evidence supported primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in treating locoregional disease with curative intent. The majority of tumours are associated with infection with oncogenic subtypes of human papilloma virus and this plays a significant role in their sensitivity to treatment. However, not all tumours are cured with CRT and there remain opportunities to improve outcomes in terms of oncological control and also reducing late toxicities. Understanding the biology of ASCC promises to allow a more personalised approach to treatment, with the development and validation of a range of biomarkers and associated techniques that are the focus of this review

Evaluation of p16INK4a expression as a single marker to select patients with HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancers for treatment de-escalation

Background A remarkably better prognosis is associated with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) driven by human papillomaviruses (HPV) compared with HPV-negative OPSCC. Consequently, de-escalation of standard treatment has been suggested. Due to modest specificity rates, debates are ongoing, whether p16(INK4a), a surrogate marker for HPV-driven OPSCC, is sufficient to correctly identify those tumours and avoid substantial HPV misattribution and thus undertreatment of patients by de-escalation. Robust data estimating the proportion of potentially undertreated patients are missing. Methods We assessed a large-scale cohort of consecutively included OPSCC diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 for HPV-DNA, HPV genotypes, p16(INK4a)expression and multiple tumour- and patient-related risk factors, and investigated their impact on patients' survival in comprehensive uni- and multivariate analyses. Results Aetiological relevance of HPV (p16(INK4a)- and high-risk HPV-DNA-positivity) was detected in 27.1% (n = 192) of OPSCC, with HPV(16)being the most abundant HPV type (94.6%). In 5.5% patients (n = 39), p16(INK4a)overexpression but no HPV-DNA was detected. Principal component and survival analyses revealed that 60.6% of these p16(INK4a)-positive OPSCC lacking HPV-DNA did not resemble HPV16-driven but HPV-negative OPSCC regarding risk-factor profile and overall survival. Notably, this group represented 10.6% of all p16(INK4a)-overexpressing OPSCC. Conclusions p16(INK4a)as a single marker appears insufficient to indicate OPSCC patients suitable for treatment de-escalation