Life on a scale:Deep brain stimulation in anorexia nervosa

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe psychiatric disorder marked by low body weight, body image abnormalities, and anxiety and shows elevated rates of morbidity, comorbidity and mortality. Given the limited availability of evidence-based treatments, there is an urgent need to investigate new therapeutic options that are informed by the disorder’s underlying neurobiological mechanisms. This thesis represents the first study in the Netherlands and one of a limited number globally to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of AN. DBS has the advantage of being both reversible and adjustable. Beyond assessing the primary impact of DBS on body weight, psychological parameters, and quality of life, this research is novel in its comprehensive approach. We integrated evaluations of efficacy with critical examinations of the functional impact of DBS in AN, including fMRI, electroencephalography EEG, as well as endocrinological and metabolic assessments. Furthermore, this work situates AN within a broader theoretical framework, specifically focusing on its manifestation as a form of self-destructive behavior. Finally, we reflect on the practical, ethical and philosophical aspects of conducting an experimental, invasive procedure in a vulnerable patient group. This thesis deepens our understanding of the neurobiological underpinnings of AN and paves the way for future research and potential clinical applications of DBS in the management of severe and enduring AN

Psychopathological and Neurobiological Overlap Between Anorexia Nervosa and Self-Injurious Behavior: A Narrative Review and Conceptual Hypotheses

Empirical evidence and clinical observations suggest a strong -yet under acknowledged-link between anorexia nervosa (AN) and non-suicidal self-injurious behavior (NSSI). By reviewing the literature on the psychopathology and neurobiology of AN and NSSI, we shed light on their relationship. Both AN and NSSI are characterized by disturbances in affect regulation, dysregulation of the reward circuitry and the opioid system. By formulating a reward-centered hypothesis, we explain the overlap between AN and NSSI. We propose three approaches understanding the relationship between AN and NSSI, which integrate psychopathology and neurobiology from the perspective of self-destructiveness: (1) a nosographical approach, (2) a research domain (RDoC) approach and (3) a network analysis approach. These approaches will enhance our knowledge of the underlying neurobiological substrates and may provide groundwork for the development of new treatment options for disorders of self-destructiveness, like AN and NSSI. In conclusion, we hypothesize that self-destructiveness is a new, DSM-5-transcending concept or psychopathological entity that is reward-driven, and that both AN and NSSI could be conceptualized as disorders of self-destructiveness

Efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Several pioneering studies investigated deep brain stimulation (DBS) in treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa (AN) patients, but overall effects remain yet unclear. Aim of this study was to obtain estimates of efficacy of DBS in AN-patients using meta-analysis. Methods: We searched three electronic databases until 1st of November 2021, using terms related to DBS and AN. We included trials that investigated the clinical effects of DBS in AN-patients. We obtained data including psychiatric comorbidities, medication use, DBS target, and study duration. Primary outcome was Body Mass Index (BMI), secondary outcome was quality of life, and the severity of psychiatric symptoms, including eating disorder, obsessive-compulsive, depressive, and anxiety symptoms. We assessed the risk of bias using the ROBINS-I tool. Results: Four studies were included for meta-analysis, with a total of 56 patients with treatment-refractory AN. Follow-up ranged from 6–24 months. Random effects meta-analysis showed a significant increase in BMI following DBS, with a large effect size (Hedges’s g = 1 ∙ 13; 95% CI = 0 ∙ 80 to 1 ∙ 46; Z-value = 6 ∙ 75; P < 0 ∙ 001), without heterogeneity (I2= 0 ∙ 00, P = 0 ∙ 901). Random effects meta-analysis also showed a significant increase in quality of life (Hedges’s g = 0 ∙ 86; 95% CI = 0 ∙ 44 to 1 ∙ 28; Z-value = 4 ∙ 01, P < 0 ∙ 001). Furthermore, DBS decreased the severity of psychiatric symptoms (Hedges’s g = 0 ∙ 89; 95% CI = 0 ∙ 57 to 1 ∙ 21; Z-value = 5 ∙ 47; P < 0 ∙ 001, I2= 4 ∙ 29, P = 0 ∙ 371). Discussion: In this first meta-analysis, DBS showed statistically large beneficial effects on weight restoration, quality of life, and reduction of psychiatric symptoms in patients with treatment-refractory AN. These outcomes call for more extensive naturalistic studies to determine the clinical relevance for functional recovery. This study is preregistered in PROSPERO,CRD42022295712

Neural effects of deep brain stimulation on reward and loss anticipation and food viewing in anorexia nervosa: a pilot study

Background: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe and life-threatening psychiatric disorder. Initial studies on deep brain stimulation (DBS) in severe, treatment-refractory AN have shown clinical effects. However, the working mechanisms of DBS in AN remain largely unknown. Here, we used a task-based functional MRI approach to understand the pathophysiology of AN.  Methods: We performed functional MRI on four AN patients that participated in a pilot study on the efficacy, safety, and functional effects of DBS targeted at the ventral limb of the capsula interna (vALIC). The patients and six gender-matched healthy controls (HC) were investigated at three different time points. We used an adapted version of the monetary incentive delay task to probe generic reward processing in patients and controls, and a food-specific task in patients only.  Results: At baseline, no significant differences for reward anticipation were found between AN and HC. Significant group (AN and HC) by time (pre- and post-DBS) interactions were found in the right precuneus, right putamen, right ventral and medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC). No significant interactions were found in the food viewing task, neither between the conditions high-calorie and low-calorie food images nor between the different time points. This could possibly be due to the small sample size and the lack of a control group.  Conclusion: The results showed a difference in the response of reward-related brain areas post-DBS. This supports the hypotheses that the reward circuitry is involved in the pathogenesis of AN and that DBS affects responsivity of reward-related brain areas. Trial registration Registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/3322 ): NL3322 (NTR3469)

Deep Brain Stimulation in Anorexia Nervosa: Hope for the Hopeless or Exploitation of the Vulnerable? The Oxford Neuroethics Gold Standard Framework

Neurosurgical interventions for psychiatric disorders have a long and troubled history (1, 2) but have become much more refined in the last few decades due to the rapid development of neuroimaging and robotic technologies (2). These advances have enabled the design of less invasive techniques, which are more focused, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) (3). DBS involves electrode insertion into specific neural targets implicated in pathological behavior, which are then repeatedly stimulated at adjustable frequencies. DBS has been used for Parkinson's disease and movement disorders since the 1960s (4-6) and over the last decade has been applied to treatment-refractory psychiatric disorders, with some evidence of benefit in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), major depressive disorder, and addictions (7). Recent consensus guidelines on best practice in psychiatric neurosurgery (8) stress, however, that DBS for psychiatric disorders remains at an experimental and exploratory stage. The ethics of DBS-in particular for psychiatric conditions-is debated (1, 8-10). Much of this discourse surrounds the philosophical implications of competence, authenticity, personality, or identity change following neurosurgical interventions, but there is a paucity of applied guidance on neuroethical best practice in psychiatric DBS, and health-care professionals have expressed that they require more (11). This paper aims to redress this balance by providing a practical, applied neuroethical gold standard framework to guide research ethics committees, researchers, and institutional sponsors. We will describe this as applied to our protocol for a particular research trial of DBS in severe and enduring anorexia nervosa (SE-AN) (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01924598, unique identifier NCT01924598), but believe it may have wider application to DBS in other psychiatric disorders

Life on a scale:Deep brain stimulation in anorexia nervosa

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe psychiatric disorder marked by low body weight, body image abnormalities, and anxiety and shows elevated rates of morbidity, comorbidity and mortality. Given the limited availability of evidence-based treatments, there is an urgent need to investigate new therapeutic options that are informed by the disorder’s underlying neurobiological mechanisms. This thesis represents the first study in the Netherlands and one of a limited number globally to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of AN. DBS has the advantage of being both reversible and adjustable. Beyond assessing the primary impact of DBS on body weight, psychological parameters, and quality of life, this research is novel in its comprehensive approach. We integrated evaluations of efficacy with critical examinations of the functional impact of DBS in AN, including fMRI, electroencephalography EEG, as well as endocrinological and metabolic assessments. Furthermore, this work situates AN within a broader theoretical framework, specifically focusing on its manifestation as a form of self-destructive behavior. Finally, we reflect on the practical, ethical and philosophical aspects of conducting an experimental, invasive procedure in a vulnerable patient group. This thesis deepens our understanding of the neurobiological underpinnings of AN and paves the way for future research and potential clinical applications of DBS in the management of severe and enduring AN

Life on a scale:Deep brain stimulation in anorexia nervosa

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe psychiatric disorder marked by low body weight, body image abnormalities, and anxiety and shows elevated rates of morbidity, comorbidity and mortality. Given the limited availability of evidence-based treatments, there is an urgent need to investigate new therapeutic options that are informed by the disorder’s underlying neurobiological mechanisms. This thesis represents the first study in the Netherlands and one of a limited number globally to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of AN. DBS has the advantage of being both reversible and adjustable. Beyond assessing the primary impact of DBS on body weight, psychological parameters, and quality of life, this research is novel in its comprehensive approach. We integrated evaluations of efficacy with critical examinations of the functional impact of DBS in AN, including fMRI, electroencephalography EEG, as well as endocrinological and metabolic assessments. Furthermore, this work situates AN within a broader theoretical framework, specifically focusing on its manifestation as a form of self-destructive behavior. Finally, we reflect on the practical, ethical and philosophical aspects of conducting an experimental, invasive procedure in a vulnerable patient group. This thesis deepens our understanding of the neurobiological underpinnings of AN and paves the way for future research and potential clinical applications of DBS in the management of severe and enduring AN

Is deep brain stimulation a treatment option for anorexia nervosa?

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe psychiatric disorder with high rates of morbidity, comorbidity and mortality, which in a subset of patients (21%) takes on a chronic course. Since an evidence based treatment for AN is scarce, it is crucial to investigate new treatment options, preferably focused on influencing the underlying neurobiological mechanisms of AN. The objective of the present paper was to review the evidence for possible neurobiological correlates of AN, and to hypothesize about potential targets for Deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a treatment for chronic, therapy-refractory AN. One avenue for exploring new treatment options based on the neurobiological correlates of AN, is the search for symptomatologic and neurobiologic parallels between AN and other compulsivity- or reward-related disorders. As in other compulsive disorders, the fronto-striatal circuitry, in particular the insula, the ventral striatum (VS) and the prefrontal, orbitofrontal, temporal, parietal and anterior cingulate cortices, are likely to be implicated in the neuropathogenesis of AN. In this paper we will review the few available cases in which DBS has been performed in patients with AN (either as primary diagnosis or as comorbid condition). Given the overlap in symptomatology and neurocircuitry between reward-related disorders such as obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and AN, and the established efficacy of accumbal DBS in OCD, we hypothesize that DBS of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and other areas associated with reward, e.g. the anterior cingulated cortex (ACC), might be an effective treatment for patients with chronic, treatment refractory AN, providing not only weight restoration, but also significant and sustained improvement in AN core symptoms and associated comorbidities and complications. Possible targets for DBS in AN are the ACC, the ventral anterior limb of the capsula interna (vALIC) and the VS. We suggest conducting larger efficacy studies that also explore the functional effects of DBS in A

Psychopathological and Neurobiological Overlap Between Anorexia Nervosa and Self-Injurious Behavior: A Narrative Review and Conceptual Hypotheses

Empirical evidence and clinical observations suggest a strong -yet under acknowledged-link between anorexia nervosa (AN) and non-suicidal self-injurious behavior (NSSI). By reviewing the literature on the psychopathology and neurobiology of AN and NSSI, we shed light on their relationship. Both AN and NSSI are characterized by disturbances in affect regulation, dysregulation of the reward circuitry and the opioid system. By formulating a reward-centered hypothesis, we explain the overlap between AN and NSSI. We propose three approaches understanding the relationship between AN and NSSI, which integrate psychopathology and neurobiology from the perspective of self-destructiveness: (1) a nosographical approach, (2) a research domain (RDoC) approach and (3) a network analysis approach. These approaches will enhance our knowledge of the underlying neurobiological substrates and may provide groundwork for the development of new treatment options for disorders of self-destructiveness, like AN and NSSI. In conclusion, we hypothesize that self-destructiveness is a new, DSM-5-transcending concept or psychopathological entity that is reward-driven, and that both AN and NSSI could be conceptualized as disorders of self-destructiveness