iDAH Research Software Engineering (RSE) Steering Group working paper

This is the final version. Available from the iDAH Research Software Engineering (RSE) Steering Group via the DOI in this record. Our purpose was to convene a broad and representative group from the UK Research Software Engineering (RSE) community to discuss opportunities for and barriers to the development of Arts & Humanities (AH) RSE capability, with a specific focus on contributing to the AHRC Infrastructure for Digital Innovation and Curation in Arts and Humanities (iDAH) project and a wider remit to consider longer term strategic priorities and opportunities for alignment with UKRI and EU initiatives. The discussion was intended to be foundational, inclusive, and broad-ranging, involving a wide stakeholder group encouraged to engage in ‘blue-sky’ thinking over short, medium, and long-term time horizons. The analysis contained in this working paper should be read in that context, as a reflection of early stage discussions intended to provide a platform for future more focused activity. Additional discussion and analysis is needed to produce substantive actionable conclusions

The recasting of insolvency law

Over the last decade corporate insolvency laws and processes have changed in two important ways. There has been a philosophical shift away from ex post responses to corporate crises and towards influencing the way that corporate actors manage the risks of insolvency ex ante. In addition, there has been a revision of insolvency roles so that participants in corporate and insolvency processes are increasingly encouraged to see corporate decline as a matter to be anticipated and prevented rather than responded to after the event. In this development turnaround specialists have gained a new prominence. These are changes that reflect broader social and governmental trends to audit performance more actively and to see issues in terms of needs to manage risks. Such developments are important for corporate and insolvency lawyers – they recast a host of issues within new framing assumptions and they force a re-thinking of corporate insolvency law's challenges and agendas

Reports of cases determined in the Appeal and Chancery divisions and selected cases in the King's Bench and at Chambers of the Supreme Court of New Brunswick,

Vol. 1, p. 1-158, was first published from Chipman's manuscript by John C. Allen in 1849. Vol. 2 issued originally in parts.Reporters: v. [1] Ward Chipman, J.C. Allen, A.O. Earle, T.C. Allen.--v. [2] G.F.S. Berton.--v. 3-5, D.S. Kerr.--v. [6]-[11] J.C. Allen (with T.C. Allen, G.B. Seely, v. [10]-[11])--v. [12]-[13] J. Hannay.--v. [14]-22, W. Pugsley (with G.W. Burbidge, v. [17]-21; A.I. Trueman, v. 22.--v. 23-32, A.I. Trueman)--v. 33-35, J.L. Carlton.--v. 36-37, G.W. Allen.--v. 38, T.C. Allen.--v. 39-46, W.H. Harrison (with D.K. Hazen, v. 42-46)--v. 47-54, Ernest Doiron, D.K. Hazen (with W.H. Harrison, v. 47)Title varies.Binder's title: New Brunswick reports.[v. 1] by Ward Chipman ... commencing Michaelmas term 1825. Ed. by J.C. Allen ... continued to Hilary term, 1835, by A.O. Earle and T.C. Allen. 1905.-[v. 2] 1835-39, by G.F.S. Berton and ed. by A.A. Stocton. 2. ed. 1882.-[v. 3-5] 1839-48, by D.S. Kerr. 3 v. 1843-48.-[v. 6-11] 1848-66, by J.C. Allen. 6 v. 1850-79.-[v. 12-13] 1867-71, by James Hanney. 2 v. 1870-75.- [v. 14-16] 1872-76, by William Pugsley. 3 v. 1875-77.- [v. 17]-21, 1877-82, by William Pugsley and G.W. Burbridge. 5 v. 1879-82.- v. 22. 1882-83, by William Pugsley and A.I. Trueman. 1883.- v. 23-32. 1883-94, by A.I. Trueman. 1885-97.-v. 33-35. 1895-1902, by J.L. Carleton. 1897-1902.- v. 36-37. 1902-06, by G.W. Allen. 1904-06.-v. 38. 1906-08, by T.C. Allen. 1908.- v. 39-41. 1908-13, by W.H. Harrison. 1910-[1914].- v. 42-46. 1913-19, by W.H. Harrison and D.K. Hazen [1915-20].- v. 47. 1919-20, by Ernest Doiron, D.K. Hazen and W.H. Harrison [1921].- v. 48-54. 1920-29, by Ernest Doiron and D.K. Hazen [1922-30]Mode of access: Internet