The prognostic effect of KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung carcinoma revisited: A norwegian multicentre study

Background: due to emerging therapeutics targeting KRAS G12C and previous reports with conflicting results regarding the prognostic impact of KRAS and KRAS G12C in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we aimed to investigate the frequency of KRAS mutations and their associations with clinical characteristics and outcome. Since mutation subtypes have different preferences for downstream pathways, we also aimed to investigate whether there were differences in outcome according to mutation preference for the Raf, PI3K/Akt, or RalGDS/Ral pathways. Methods: retrospectively, clinicopathological data from 1233 stage I–IV non-squamous NSCLC patients with known KRAS status were reviewed. KRAS’ associations with clinical characteristics were analysed. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed for the following groups: KRAS wild type (wt) versus mutated, KRAS wt versus KRAS G12C versus KRAS non-G12C, among KRAS mutation subtypes and among mutation subtypes grouped according to preference for downstream pathways. Results: a total of 1117 patients were included; 38% had KRAS mutated tumours, 17% had G12C. Among KRAS mutated, G12C was the most frequent mutation in former/current smokers (45%) and G12D in never smokers (46%). There were no significant differences in survival according to KRAS status, G12C status, among KRAS mutation subtypes or mutation preference for downstream pathways. Conclusion: KRAS status or KRAS mutation subtype did not have any significant influence on PFS or OS

Assessment of Two Commercial Comprehensive Gene Panels for Personalized Cancer Treatment

(1) Background: Analysis of tumor DNA by next-generation sequencing (NGS) plays various roles in the classification and management of cancer. This study aimed to assess the performance of two similar and large, comprehensive gene panels with a focus on clinically relevant variant detection and tumor mutation burden (TMB) assessment; (2) Methods: DNA from 19 diagnostic small cell lung cancer biopsies and an AcroMetrix™ assessment sample with >500 mutations were sequenced using Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCAP) on the Ion Torrent platform and TruSight Oncology 500 Assay (TSO500) on the Illumina platform; (3) Results: OCAP and TSO500 achieved comparable NGS quality, such as mean read coverage and mean coverage uniformity. A total of 100% of the variants in the diagnostic samples and 80% of the variants in the AcroMetrix™ assessment sample were detected by both panels, and the panels reported highly similar variant allele frequency. A proportion of 14/19 (74%) samples were classified in the same TMB category; (4) Conclusions: Comparable results were obtained using OCAP and TSO500, suggesting that both panels could be applied to screen patients for enrolment in personalized cancer treatment trials

Associations between tumor mutations in cfDNA and survival in non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: Studies have indicated that detection of mutated KRAS or EGFR in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from pre-treatment plasma samples is a negative prognostic factor for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pa-tients. This study aims to investigate whether this is the case also for NSCLC patients with other tumor mutations. Methods: Tumor tissue DNA from 107 NSCLC patients was sequenced and corresponding pre-treatment plasma samples were analyzed using a limited target next-generation sequencing approach validated in this study. Pa-tients without detected mutations in tumor samples were excluded from further analyses. Results: Mutations were detected in tumor samples from 71 patients. Median age was 68 years, 51% were female, and 88% were current/former smokers, 91% had adenocarcinoma, 4% had squamous cell carcinoma and 6% had other NSCLC. The distribution between stage I, II, III and IV was 33%, 8%, 30%, and 29%, respectively. Between one and three tumor mutation(s) were detected in ctDNA from corresponding plasma samples. Patients with detected ctDNA had shorter PFS (9.6 vs. 41.3 months, HR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.6–5.2, p =0.0003) and OS (13.6 vs. 115.0 months, HR: 4.0, 95% CI: 2.1–7.6, p =0.00002) than patients without detected ctDNA. ctDNA remained a significant negative prognostic factor for OS (HR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.1-5.7, p=0.0327), but not PFS, in the multi-variable analyses adjusting for baseline patient and disease characteristics including stage of disease. Conclusions: This study adds further evidence supporting that detectable tumor mutations in cfDNA is associated with a worse prognosis in NSCLC harboring a variety of tumor mutations

Prognostic value of absolute quantification of mutated KRAS in circulating tumour DNA in lung adenocarcinoma patients prior to therapy

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is a highly sensitive and accurate method for quantification of nucleic acid sequences. We used absolute quantification of mutated v‐Ki‐ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homology gene (KRAS) by ddPCR to investigate the prognostic role of mutated KRAS in patients with KRAS‐mutated lung adenocarcinomas. Pre‐treatment plasma samples from 60 patients with stages I–IV KRAS‐mutated lung adenocarcinomas were analysed for KRAS mutations. The associations between survival, detectable KRAS mutations in plasma, and the plasma concentration of mutated KRAS were assessed. Overall, 23 of 60 (38%) patients had detectable KRAS mutation in plasma. The percentage of patients with detectable mutation was 8% in stage I, 30% in stage II, 71% in stage III, and 73% in stage IV. Estimated overall median progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 26.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.5–39.9] and 50.8 months (95% CI 0–107.3), respectively. Patients with detectable mutations in plasma had significantly worse median PFS compared to patients with undetectable mutation (13.1 versus 70.1 months) and shorter median OS (20.7 versus not reached). High circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) concentrations of mutated KRAS were significantly associated with shorter PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.008, 95% CI 1.004–1.012] and OS (HR 1.007, 95% CI 1.003–1.011). All associations remained statistically significant in multivariable analyses. In conclusion, ddPCR is an accurate and easily feasible technique for quantification of KRAS mutations in ctDNA. The presence of detectable KRAS mutation in plasma at baseline was associated with worse PFS and OS. High concentration of mutated KRAS in ctDNA was an independent negative prognostic factor for both PFS and OS

Adaptor Template Oligo-Mediated Sequencing (ATOM-Seq) is a new ultra-sensitive UMI-based NGS library preparation technology for use with cfDNA and cfRNA

Liquid biopsy testing utilising Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is rapidly moving towards clinical adoption for personalised oncology. However, before NGS can fulfil its potential any novel testing approach must identify ways of reducing errors, allowing separation of true low-frequency mutations from procedural artefacts, and be designed to improve upon current technologies. Popular NGS technologies typically utilise two DNA capture approaches; PCR and ligation, which have known limitations and seem to have reached a development plateau with only small, stepwise improvements being made. To maximise the ultimate utility of liquid biopsy testing we have developed a highly versatile approach to NGS: Adaptor Template Oligo Mediated Sequencing (ATOM-Seq). ATOM-Seq's strengths and versatility avoid the major limitations of both PCR- and ligation-based approaches. This technology is ligation free, simple, efficient, flexible, and streamlined, and it offers novel advantages that make it perfectly suited for use on highly challenging clinical material. Using reference and clinical materials, we demonstrate detection of known SNVs down to allele frequencies of 0.1% using as little as 20–25 ng of cfDNA, as well as the ability to detect fusions from RNA. We illustrate ATOM-Seq’s suitability for clinical testing by showing high concordance rates between paired cfDNA and FFPE clinical samples