Rehabilitering og sekundærforebygging etter hjerteinfarkt ved sykehus

BAKGRUNN I norske studier er det dokumentert dårlig kardiovaskulær risikofaktorkontroll og høy forekomst av nye hjerte- og karhendelser hos hjerteinfarktpasienter. Det foreligger lite kunnskap om omfang av sekundærforebyggende behandling og hjerterehabilitering ved norske sykehus. Vi ønsket derfor å gjennomføre en kartlegging av rutiner ved utskrivning og poliklinisk oppfølging etter hjerteinfarkt. MATERIALE OG METODE I oktober 2018 ble avdelingsoverleger på hjerteavdelinger og avdelingssykepleier/fysioterapeut på hjertepoliklinikker ved alle norske sykehus (N = 51) kontaktet med forespørsel om å delta i et telefonintervju. RESULTATER Til sammen 40 (78 %) leger og 51 (100 %) sykepleiere/fysioterapeuter gjennomførte telefonintervjuet. Elleve sykehus brukte standardiserte epikrisemaler med behandlingsmål og forventet oppfølging. Ti sykehus tilbød rutinemessig poliklinisk kontroll. 47 sykehus (92 %) tilbød tverrfaglig hjerterehabilitering, hjerteskole eller hjertetrening, og av disse tilbød ni (18 %) tverrfaglig, sammensatt hjerterehabilitering i henhold til internasjonale anbefalinger. FORTOLKNING Kartleggingen avdekket betydelige forskjeller i rapporterte rutiner ved utskrivning og tilbud om hjerterehabilitering og poliklinisk oppfølging ved norske sykehus. HOVEDFUNN Vi fant betydelig variasjon i rapporterte rutiner for utskrivning og omfang av hjerterehabilitering for pasienter etter akutt koronarsykdom. Under 20 % av norske sykehus tilbød tverrfaglig, sammensatt hjerterehabilitering

The limited usefulness of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography in obtaining normal reference ranges for right ventricular volumes

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>To obtain normal reference ranges and intraobserver variability for right ventricular (RV) volume indexes (VI) and ejection fraction (EF) from apical recordings with real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE), and similarly for RV area indexes (AI) and area fraction (AF) with 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>166 participants; 79 males and 87 females aged between 29–79 years and considered free from clinical and subclinical cardiovascular disease. Normal ranges are defined as 95% reference values and reproducibility as coefficients of variation (CV) for repeated measurements.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>None of the apical recordings with RT3DE and 2DE included the RV outflow tract. Upper reference values were 62 ml/m²for RV end-diastolic (ED) VI and 24 ml/m²for RV end-systolic (ES) VI. Lower normal reference value for RVEF was 41%. The respective reference ranges were 17 cm²/m²for RVEDAI, 11 cm²/m²for RVESAI and 27% for RVAF. Males had higher upper normal values for RVEDVI, RVESVI and RVEDAI, and a lower limit than females for RVEF and RVAF. Weak but significant negative correlations between age and RV dimensions were found with RT3DE, but not with 2DE. CVs for repeated measurements ranged between 10% and 14% with RT3DE and from 5% to 14% with 2DE.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Although the normal ranges for RVVIs and RVAIs presented in this study reflect RV inflow tract dimensions only, the data presented may still be regarded as a useful tool in clinical practice, especially for RVEF and RVAF.</p

The effect of tobacco smoking and treatment strategy on the one-year mortality of patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a previously shown survival benefit resulting from routine early invasive management of unselected patients with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) may differ according to smoking status and age.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive patients admitted for NSTEMI in 2003 (conservative strategy cohort [CS]; n = 185) and 2006 (invasive strategy cohort [IS]; n = 200). A strategy for transfer to a high-volume invasive center and routine early invasive management was implemented in 2005. Patients were subdivided into current smokers and non-smokers (including ex-smokers) on admission.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The one-year mortality rate of smokers was reduced from 37% in the CS to 6% in the IS (p < 0.001), and from 30% to 23% for non-smokers (p = 0.18). Non-smokers were considerably older than smokers (median age 80 vs. 63 years, p < 0.001). The percentage of smokers who underwent revascularization (angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting) within 7 days increased from 9% in the CS to 53% in the IS (p < 0.001). The corresponding numbers for non-smokers were 5% and 27% (p < 0.001). There was no interaction between strategy and age (p = 0.25), as opposed to a significant interaction between strategy and smoking status (p = 0.024). Current smoking was an independent predictor of one-year mortality (hazard ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval 1.43-4.79, p = 0.002).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The treatment effect of an early invasive strategy in unselected patients with NSTEMI was more pronounced among smokers than non-smokers. The benefit for smokers was not entirely explained by differences in baseline confounders, such as their younger age.</p

The "smoker's paradox" in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Smokers have been shown to have lower mortality after acute coronary syndrome than non-smokers. This has been attributed to the younger age, lower co-morbidity, more aggressive treatment and lower risk profile of the smoker. Some studies, however, have used multivariate analyses to show a residual survival benefit for smokers; that is, the "smoker's paradox". The aim of this study was, therefore, to perform a systematic review of the literature and evidence surrounding the existence of the "smoker's paradox".</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Relevant studies published by September 2010 were identified through literature searches using EMBASE (from 1980), MEDLINE (from 1963) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with a combination of text words and subject headings used. English-language original articles were included if they presented data on hospitalised patients with defined acute coronary syndrome, reported at least in-hospital mortality, had a clear definition of smoking status (including ex-smokers), presented crude and adjusted mortality data with effect estimates, and had a study sample of > 100 smokers and > 100 non-smokers. Two investigators independently reviewed all titles and abstracts in order to identify potentially relevant articles, with any discrepancies resolved by repeated review and discussion.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 978 citations were identified, with 18 citations from 17 studies included thereafter. Six studies (one observational study, three registries and two randomised controlled trials on thrombolytic treatment) observed a "smoker's paradox". Between the 1980s and 1990s these studies enrolled patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) according to criteria similar to the World Health Organisation criteria from 1979. Among the remaining 11 studies not supporting the existence of the paradox, five studies represented patients undergoing contemporary management.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The "smoker's paradox" was observed in some studies of AMI patients in the pre-thrombolytic and thrombolytic era, whereas no studies of a contemporary population with acute coronary syndrome have found evidence for such a paradox.</p

Prevalence and prognosis of non-specific chest pain among patients hospitalized for suspected acute coronary syndrome - a systematic literature search

BACKGROUND: The term non-specific chest pain (NSCP) is applied to hospitalized patients in order to designate that they neither have an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) nor display evidence of a coronary ischemia. The number of NSCP patients is increasing and comprehensive guidelines specifying their optimal management have not yet been introduced. The objective of this review was to explore the prevalence and prognosis of NSCP versus ACS among patients recruited in consecutive series hospitalized for chest pain suspected to be ACS. METHODS: This is a systematic literature search where three databases were searched from 1990 to 14 November 2011. In addition, one database was searched for Epub ahead of print per 24 March 2012. Three inclusion criteria were applied: 1. documentation of an unselected consecutive series of patients admitted for chest pain, where this review is based upon two groups of patients defined as follows: a) 'ACS/high-risk' and b) NSCP; 2. at least 100 cases with NSCP; and 3. follow-up of hospital readmissions and mortality for at least six months. RESULTS: A total of 2,204 citations were screened after removal of duplicates. Out of 80 full text articles assessed for eligibility 12 studies were included, comprising 24,829 patients (inter-study range 250 to 13,762), with 11,008 (44%) categorized as NSCP and 13,821 (56%) as 'ACS/high-risk'. The mean one-year total mortality rate among patients with NSCP in nine studies was 3.2% (inter-study range 1.4% to 8.1%), with the highest mortality among patients with pre-existing coronary heart disease (CHD). The mean one-year mortality rate among 'ACS/high-risk' patients was 18.0% (inter-study range 14.0% to 19.9%) in four studies with available data. In six studies the mean one-year readmission rate for patients with NSCP was 17.5% (inter-study range 2.5% to 40%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSCP represent a large, heterogeneous and important group. Due to co-existing CHD in nearly 40% of these patients, their prognosis is not necessarily benign. Although their average one-year mortality rate was almost six times lower than those with 'ACS/high-risk', the subset with concomitant CHD had a relatively poor prognosis when compared with NSCP patients without evidence of CHD

Biochemical diagnosis of myocardial infarction evolves towards ESC/ACC consensus: experiences from the Nordic countries

To access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links fieldOBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic approach in Nordic hospitals receiving patients suspected of acute myocardial infarction (MI), especially focusing on implementation of the recently proposed criteria by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) for the definition of MI. DESIGN: A survey with questionnaires of the diagnostic approach was conducted among all relevant departments (220) in the Nordic countries. RESULTS: Seventy-six percent (167) of hospitals responded. Troponins I and T (TnI and TnT) and creatinine kinase monobasic fraction (mass concentration) (CKMB(mass)) covered 93 and 65% of hospitals, respectively. Of troponin users, 34% indicated use of TnI vs 66% using TnT. Sporadic use of AST, CK, LD and myoglobin was reported. There was a tendency to lower cut-off levels in Sweden and Finland. Among troponin assays, there was considerable heterogeneity regarding cut-off levels. CONCLUSIONS: The Nordic countries are approaching ESC/ACC consensus on cardiac markers. Compared with previous national surveys (1995-1999), there is a shift towards the use of troponins. However, differences in cut-off levels of troponin emphasize the need for harmonization of assays