Engaging community health workers, technology, and youth in the COVID-19 response with concurrent critical care capacity building: A protocol for an integrated community and health system intervention to reduce mortality related to COVID-19 infection in Western Kenya

Globally, the number of COVID-19 infections is approaching 63 million; more than 1 million individuals have lost their lives. In Kenya, the number of infections has surpassed 80,000 and 1469 people have lost their lives. In Kenya, the community health strategy has been used to deliver essential health services since 2007. Furthermore, the population in Kenya is young (the median age is 21 years old) and Kenya is recognized as a technology hub in the East African region. Community-based health care, youth, and technology, are assets within the Kenyan context that can be leveraged to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic with concurrent strengthening of the critical care capacity at the health system level. This is a quasi-experimental study with quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection to complete a baseline assessment of community health unit and health facility service readiness in the study site of Siaya County in western Kenya. Following the baseline assessment, service ready community health units and health facilities with oxygen capacity will form intervention groups. At the community level, the intervention will consist of training youth, community health assistants and community health workers in screening, case detection, prevention, management and referral of COVID-19 cases with maintenance of essential health services. The community intervention will be enhanced by youth and use of digital tools. At the health facility level, the intervention will consist of training health care workers in basic critical care and caring for severe COVID-19 patients with maintenance of essential health services. The primary outcome measure will be mortality related to COVID-19 infection both at community and health facility levels. This study would be the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated approach in preparing for and implementing a robust pandemic response. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04501458; registered on 6 August 2020.</ns3:p

The effectiveness of community health worker training, equipping, and deployment in reducing COVID-19 infections and deaths in rural Western Kenya: A comparison of two counties.

COVID-19 and other pandemics remain significant threats to population health, particularly in rural settings where health systems are disproportionately weak. There is a lack of evidence on whether trained, equipped, and deployed community health workers (CHWs) can lead to significant reductions in COVID-19 infections and deaths. Our objective was to measure the effectiveness of deploying trained and equipped CHWs in reducing COVID-19 infections and deaths by comparing outcomes in two counties in rural Western Kenya, a setting with limited critical care capacity and limited access to COVID-19 vaccines and oral COVID-19 antivirals. In Siaya, trained CHWs equipped with thermometers, pulse oximeters, and KN95 masks, visited households to convey health information about COVID-19 prevention. They screened, isolated, and referred COVID-19 cases to facilities with oxygen capacity. They measured and digitally recorded vital signs at the household level. In Kisii county, the standard Kenya national COVID-19 protocol was implemented. We performed a comparative analysis of differences in CHW skills, activity, and COVID-19 infections and deaths using district health information system (DHIS2) data. Trained Siaya CHWs were more skilled in using pulse oximeters and digitally reporting vital signs at the household level. The mean number of oxygen saturation measurements conducted in Siaya was 24.19 per COVID-19 infection; and the mean number of temperature measurements per COVID-19 infection was 17.08. Siaya CHWs conducted significantly more household visits than Kisii CHWs (the mean monthly CHW household visits in Siaya was 146,648.5, standard deviation 11,066.5 versus 42,644.5 in Kisii, standard deviation 899.5, p value = 0.01). Deploying trained and equipped CHWs in rural Western Kenya was associated with lower risk ratios for COVID-19 infections and deaths: 0.54, 95% CI [0.48-0.61] and 0.29, CI [0.13-0.65], respectively, consistent with a beneficial effect

Determinants of health facility utilization for childbirth in rural western Kenya: cross-sectional study

Background: Skilled attendance at delivery is recognized as one of the most important factors in preventing maternal death. However, more than 50% of births in Kenya still occur in non-institutional locations supported by family members and/or traditional birth attendants (TBAs). To improve this situation, a study of the determinants of facility delivery, including individual, family and community factors, was necessary to consider effective intervention in Kenya.Methods: This study was conducted to identify the factors which influence the place of delivery in rural western Kenya, and to recommend ways to improve women\u27s access to skilled attendants at delivery. A community-based cross-sectional survey was carried out from August to September 2011 in all 64 sub-locations which were covered by community health workers (CHWs). An interviewer-administered questionnaire on seventeen comprehensive variables was administered to 2,560 women who had children aged 12-24 months.Results: The response rate was 79% (n = 2,026). Of the respondents, 48% of births occurred in a health facility and 52% in a non-institutional location. The significant determinants of facility delivery examined using multivariate analysis were: maternal education level, maternal health knowledge, ANC visits, birth interval, economic status of household, number of household members, household sanitation practices and traveling time to nearest health facility.Conclusions: The results suggest that the involvement of TBAs to promote facility delivery is still one of the most important strategies. Strengthening CHWs\u27 performance by focusing on a limited number of topics and clear management guidance might also be an effective intervention. Stressing the importance of regular attendance at ANC (at least four times) would be effective in enhancing motivation for a facility delivery. Based on our findings, those actions to improve the facility delivery rate should focus more on pregnant women who have a low education level, poor health knowledge and short pregnancy spacing. In addition, women with low economic status, a large number of family members and a long distance to travel to a health facility should also be targeted by further interventions

Effectiveness of four interventions in improving community health workers\u27 performance in western Kenya: a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study using a longitudinal data

BACKGROUND: Community health workers (CHWs) are up-front health workers delivering the most effective life-saving health services to communities. They are the key driver to achieve Universal Health Coverage. However, maintaining CHWs\u27 performance is one of the challenges in sustaining their effectiveness. This article assessed the effectiveness of the four interventions and their combinations on the CHWs\u27 performance in terms of health knowledge, job satisfaction, and household coverage. METHODS: We used the longitudinal survey data collected in western Kenya. Our study participants were the representative of all CHWs working in the four districts, Kenya. The four types of interventions were composed of a basic core intervention (i.e., refresher training with/without defaulter tracing) and three supplementary interventions (i.e., provision of a bicycle, frequent supportive supervision, and financial incentives). We performed the three fixed-effect models to assess the effectiveness of the four interventions and their combinations on the three performance indicators. RESULTS: Three single and combination interventions significantly increased CHWs\u27 health knowledge: refresher training only [Coef.: 48.43, 95% CI: 42.09-54.76, P \u3c 0.001]; refresher training plus defaulter-tracing [Coef.: 38.80, 95% CI: 32.71-44.90, P \u3c 0.001]; combination of refresher training plus defaulter-tracing and frequent supervision [Coef.: 17.02, 95% CI: 7.90-26.15, P \u3c 0.001]. Financial support was the only intervention that significantly increased job satisfaction among CHWs [Coef.: 4.97, 95% CI: 0.20-9.75, P = 0.041]. There was no single intervention that significantly increased household coverage. Yet, the combinations of the interventions significantly increased household coverage. CONCLUSIONS: There was no single intervention to improve all the aspects of CHWs\u27 performance. The refresher training significantly improved their health knowledge, while financial incentive enhanced the level of their job satisfaction. The combinations of regular refresher training and other intervention(s) are the recommended as the effective interventions in improving and further sustaining CHWs\u27 performance