4 research outputs found

    The Effect of Anesthesia Type During Delivery on Neonatal Otoacoustic Emission Hearing Test Results: A Tertiary Center Experience

    No full text
    Background Hearing is essential for the healthy development of an infant as language is one of the main stimulants of intellectual capacity. We investigate the effect of anesthesia type during delivery on neonatal otoacoustic emission (OAE) hearing test results

    Impact of timing on wound dressing removal after caesarean delivery: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

    No full text
    We compared wound dressing removal at 24 hours versus 48 hours following low-risk caesarean deliveries. This multicentre, randomised, controlled study included patients 18−44 years of age with low-risk term, singleton pregnancies. The randomisation was done weekly. Scheduled caesarean deliveries without labour were included. For comparison, the Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of deep tissues, Isolation of bacteria, Stay in hospital > 14 days (ASEPSIS) score for wound healing assessment was modified. The absolute scores were obtained based on a one-day reading rather than the five-day reading used in ASEPSIS. Zero (“0”) was assigned as a complete healing. Higher scores were associated with more severe disruption of healing. The patients were enrolled between March 2015 and February 2017. The demographics were not statistically different. The wound scoring was similar in the groups at discharge and first-week evaluation. At the six weeks post-surgery, the wound scoring was significantly less in the 48-hour (3.9%) versus the 24-hour group (9%; p = .002). Dressing removal at 48 hours had a lower scoring in the low-risk population with scheduled caesarean deliveries.IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? Surgical dressings are used to provide suitable conditions to heal caesarean incisions. There has been a limited number of studies on the evaluation of ideal timing on wound dressing removal after a caesarean delivery. These studies concluded there are no increased wound complications with removal at six hours versus 24 hours or within or beyond 48 hours after surgery. What do the results of this study add? The postoperative removal of the wound dressing at 48 hours had a lower wound score at six weeks than the removal at 24 hours for women with uncomplicated scheduled caesarean deliveries. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Early discharge after caesarean delivery is becoming more common. Dressing removal at 24 hours versus 48 hours becomes more crucial and needs to be clarified. Besides, high-risk populations, different skin closure techniques, and patients in labour should be addressed separately

    Experience of a tertiary pandemic centre on the labour and delivery of 337 pregnant women with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study from Turkey

    No full text
    The aim of the present study is to share the experience of a tertiary reference pandemic centre on the labour and delivery of pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This prospective cohort study was conducted on pregnant women with COVID-19 (n = 337). Patients were divided into two groups based on their severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity (n = 103 positive and n = 234 negative) during the delivery. Thereafter, clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Moreover, delivery characteristics and clinical features were compared between primary caesarean section (n = 117) and normal spontaneous vaginal delivery cases (n = 100). Labour induction was performed in 16% of cases with a failure rate of 35%. Caesarean rate was 70% and the most common indication was worsening in maternal condition. Significant, positive and moderate correlations were observed between COVID-19 severity at admission (r = 0.422, p<.001), radiologic findings consistent with COVID-19 (r = 0.400, p<.001), the necessity for oxygen support during the delivery (r = 0.406, p<.001) and postpartum worsening in maternal condition. A significant, positive weak correlation was found between caesarean delivery and postpartum worsening in maternal condition (r = 0.176, p<.001). COVID-19 seems to be associated with increased rates of obstetric complications and caesarean delivery.Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Increased rates of foetal distress and caesarean section were reported in pregnant women with COVID-19. Appropriate management of labour and delivery in infected pregnant women is crucial to obtain favourable perinatal outcomes. What do the results of this study add? COVID-19 seems to be associated with increased rates of obstetric complications and caesarean delivery. PCR positive group had significantly higher primary and prelabor caesarean delivery rates. Severe/critic COVID-19 infection rate was significantly higher in the primary caesarean group. Significant, positive and moderate correlations were observed between COVID-19 severity at admission, radiologic findings consistent with COVID-19, the necessity for oxygen support during the delivery and postpartum worsening in maternal condition. A significant, positive weak correlation was found between caesarean delivery and postpartum worsening in maternal condition. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Management and delivery of pregnant women with COVID-19 should be individualised. The findings of the present study may lead to the establishment of future obstetric protocols in this special population
    corecore